High-frequency electrical stimulation increases cortical excitability and mechanical sensitivity in a chronic large animal model.

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
PAIN® Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003354
Suzan Meijs, Felipe Rettore Andreis, Taha Al Muhammadee Janjua, Thomas Graven-Nielsen, Winnie Jensen
{"title":"High-frequency electrical stimulation increases cortical excitability and mechanical sensitivity in a chronic large animal model.","authors":"Suzan Meijs, Felipe Rettore Andreis, Taha Al Muhammadee Janjua, Thomas Graven-Nielsen, Winnie Jensen","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Translational models of the sensitized pain system are needed to progress the understanding of involved mechanisms. In this study, long-term potentiation was used to develop a mechanism-based large-animal pain model. Event-related potentials to electrical stimulation of the ulnar nerve were recorded by intracranial recordings in pigs, 3 weeks before, immediately before and after, and 3 weeks after peripheral high-frequency stimulation (HFS) applied to the ulnar nerve in the right forelimb (7 pigs) or in control animals (5 pigs). Event-related potential recordings and peripheral HFS were done during anesthesia. Two weeks before and after the HFS, behavioral responses reflecting mechanical and thermal sensitivity were collected using brush, noxious limb-mounted pressure algometer, and noxious laser stimuli. The HFS intervention limb was progressively sensitized to noxious mechanical stimulation in week 1 and 2 compared with baseline ( P = 0.045) and the control group ( P < 0.034) but not significantly to laser or brush stimulation. The first negative (N1) peak of the event-related potential was increased 30 minutes after HFS compared with before ( P < 0.05). The N1 peak was also larger compared with control pigs 20 to 40 minutes after HFS ( P < 0.031) but not significantly increased 3 weeks after. The relative increase in N1 30 minutes after HFS and the degree of mechanical hyperalgesia 2 weeks post-HFS was correlated ( P < 0.033). These results show for the first time that the pig HFS model resembles the human HFS model closely where the profile of sensitization is comparable. Interestingly, the degree of sensitization was associated with the cortical signs of hyperexcitability at HFS induction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":"e18-e26"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003354","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Translational models of the sensitized pain system are needed to progress the understanding of involved mechanisms. In this study, long-term potentiation was used to develop a mechanism-based large-animal pain model. Event-related potentials to electrical stimulation of the ulnar nerve were recorded by intracranial recordings in pigs, 3 weeks before, immediately before and after, and 3 weeks after peripheral high-frequency stimulation (HFS) applied to the ulnar nerve in the right forelimb (7 pigs) or in control animals (5 pigs). Event-related potential recordings and peripheral HFS were done during anesthesia. Two weeks before and after the HFS, behavioral responses reflecting mechanical and thermal sensitivity were collected using brush, noxious limb-mounted pressure algometer, and noxious laser stimuli. The HFS intervention limb was progressively sensitized to noxious mechanical stimulation in week 1 and 2 compared with baseline ( P = 0.045) and the control group ( P < 0.034) but not significantly to laser or brush stimulation. The first negative (N1) peak of the event-related potential was increased 30 minutes after HFS compared with before ( P < 0.05). The N1 peak was also larger compared with control pigs 20 to 40 minutes after HFS ( P < 0.031) but not significantly increased 3 weeks after. The relative increase in N1 30 minutes after HFS and the degree of mechanical hyperalgesia 2 weeks post-HFS was correlated ( P < 0.033). These results show for the first time that the pig HFS model resembles the human HFS model closely where the profile of sensitization is comparable. Interestingly, the degree of sensitization was associated with the cortical signs of hyperexcitability at HFS induction.

在慢性大型动物模型中,高频电刺激可提高大脑皮层的兴奋性和机械敏感性。
摘要:需要建立敏感疼痛系统的转化模型,以加深对相关机制的理解。本研究利用长期电位来建立基于机制的大动物疼痛模型。在对猪右前肢尺神经(7 头猪)或对照组动物(5 头猪)进行外周高频刺激(HFS)3 周前、前后和 3 周后,通过颅内记录记录了尺神经电刺激的事件相关电位。事件相关电位记录和外周高频刺激是在麻醉状态下进行的。在进行 HFS 前后两周,使用刷子、肢端安装的有害压力计和有害激光刺激收集反映机械和热敏感性的行为反应。与基线(P = 0.045)和对照组(P < 0.034)相比,HFS干预肢体在第1周和第2周对有害机械刺激逐渐敏感,但对激光或毛刷刺激的敏感性不明显。HFS 30 分钟后,事件相关电位的第一个负(N1)峰值与之前相比有所增加(P < 0.05)。HFS 后 20 至 40 分钟,N1 峰值也比对照组猪大(P < 0.031),但 3 周后没有明显增加。HFS 30 分钟后 N1 的相对增加与 HFS 2 周后机械痛觉减退的程度相关(P < 0.033)。这些结果首次表明,猪 HFS 模型与人类 HFS 模型十分相似,两者的致敏程度相当。有趣的是,致敏程度与诱导 HFS 时大脑皮层过度兴奋的迹象有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信