Cortical activation among young adults during mobility in an indoor real-world environment: A mobile EEG approach

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Samantha Marshall , Gianna Jeyarajan , Nicholas Hayhow , Raphael Gabiazon , Tia Seleem , Mathew R. Hammerstrom , Olav Krigolson , Lindsay S. Nagamatsu
{"title":"Cortical activation among young adults during mobility in an indoor real-world environment: A mobile EEG approach","authors":"Samantha Marshall ,&nbsp;Gianna Jeyarajan ,&nbsp;Nicholas Hayhow ,&nbsp;Raphael Gabiazon ,&nbsp;Tia Seleem ,&nbsp;Mathew R. Hammerstrom ,&nbsp;Olav Krigolson ,&nbsp;Lindsay S. Nagamatsu","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Human mobility requires neurocognitive inputs to safely navigate the environment. Previous research has examined neural processes that underly walking using mobile neuroimaging technologies, yet few studies have incorporated true real-world methods without a specific task imposed on participants (e.g., dual-task, motor demands). The present study included 40 young adults (M = 22.60, SD = 2.63, 24 female) and utilized mobile electroencephalography (EEG) to examine and compare theta, alpha, and beta frequency band power (μV<sup>2</sup>) during sitting and walking in laboratory and real-world environments. EEG data was recorded using the Muse S brain sensing headband, a portable system equipped with four electrodes (two frontal, two temporal) and one reference sensor. Qualitative data detailing the thoughts of each participant were collected after each condition. For the quantitative data, a 2 × 2 repeated measures ANOVA with within subject factors of environment and mobility was conducted with full participant datasets (n = 17, M = 22.59, SD = 2.97, 10 female). Thematic analysis was performed on the qualitative data (n = 40). Our findings support that mobility and environment may modulate neural activity, as we observed increased brain activation for walking compared to sitting, and for real-world walking compared to laboratory walking. We identified five qualitative themes across the four conditions 1) physical sensations and bodily awareness, 2) responsibilities and planning, 3) environmental awareness, 4) mobility, and 5) spotlight effect. Our study highlights the importance and potential for real-world methods to supplement standard research practices to increase the ecological validity of studies conducted in the fields of neuroscience and kinesiology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224001866/pdfft?md5=052c8c274ece1da0e2ed9f714016175e&pid=1-s2.0-S0028393224001866-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224001866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human mobility requires neurocognitive inputs to safely navigate the environment. Previous research has examined neural processes that underly walking using mobile neuroimaging technologies, yet few studies have incorporated true real-world methods without a specific task imposed on participants (e.g., dual-task, motor demands). The present study included 40 young adults (M = 22.60, SD = 2.63, 24 female) and utilized mobile electroencephalography (EEG) to examine and compare theta, alpha, and beta frequency band power (μV2) during sitting and walking in laboratory and real-world environments. EEG data was recorded using the Muse S brain sensing headband, a portable system equipped with four electrodes (two frontal, two temporal) and one reference sensor. Qualitative data detailing the thoughts of each participant were collected after each condition. For the quantitative data, a 2 × 2 repeated measures ANOVA with within subject factors of environment and mobility was conducted with full participant datasets (n = 17, M = 22.59, SD = 2.97, 10 female). Thematic analysis was performed on the qualitative data (n = 40). Our findings support that mobility and environment may modulate neural activity, as we observed increased brain activation for walking compared to sitting, and for real-world walking compared to laboratory walking. We identified five qualitative themes across the four conditions 1) physical sensations and bodily awareness, 2) responsibilities and planning, 3) environmental awareness, 4) mobility, and 5) spotlight effect. Our study highlights the importance and potential for real-world methods to supplement standard research practices to increase the ecological validity of studies conducted in the fields of neuroscience and kinesiology.

Abstract Image

年轻人在室内真实环境中移动时的皮层激活:移动脑电图方法。
人类移动需要神经认知输入才能安全地在环境中导航。以往的研究利用移动神经成像技术检查了支撑行走的神经过程,但很少有研究采用真正的真实世界方法,而不对参与者强加特定任务(如双重任务、运动需求)。本研究纳入了 40 名年轻成年人(中位数 = 22.60,标准差 = 2.63,女性 24 人),并利用移动脑电图(EEG)检查和比较了在实验室和真实世界环境中坐着和行走时的θ、α和β频段功率(μV2)。脑电图数据使用 Muse S 脑感应头带记录,该便携式系统配有四个电极(两个额部电极、两个颞部电极)和一个参考传感器。每个条件结束后都会收集定性数据,详细记录每位参与者的想法。在定量数据方面,对所有参与者数据集(n = 17,M = 22.59,SD = 2.97,10 名女性)进行了 2 x 2 重复测量方差分析,其中包含环境和移动性等主题内因素。对定性数据(n = 40)进行了主题分析。我们的研究结果表明,移动性和环境可能会调节神经活动,因为我们观察到,与坐着相比,行走时大脑的激活程度更高;与实验室行走相比,真实世界中行走时大脑的激活程度更高。我们在四种情况下确定了五个定性主题:1)身体感觉和身体意识;2)责任和计划;3)环境意识;4)移动性;5)聚光灯效应。我们的研究强调了真实世界方法的重要性和潜力,以补充标准研究实践,提高神经科学和运动学领域研究的生态有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信