Clinical Anatomy of the Sacral Nerve Roots and Its Relevance to Their Reconstruction After Sacrectomy.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Radek Kaiser, Anhelina Khadanovich, Michal Benes, Jeremy Reynolds, Gerard Mawhinney, Henk Giele, David Kachlik
{"title":"Clinical Anatomy of the Sacral Nerve Roots and Its Relevance to Their Reconstruction After Sacrectomy.","authors":"Radek Kaiser, Anhelina Khadanovich, Michal Benes, Jeremy Reynolds, Gerard Mawhinney, Henk Giele, David Kachlik","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>En bloc sacrectomy is associated with sacral root transection causing loss of urinary bladder, rectum, and sexual function. The aim of the study was to determine the position of the pudendal branches (sensorimotor) and pelvic splanchnic nerves (parasympathetic) on the sacral roots relative to the sacrum, and the minimal and maximal defects in the sacral roots that can be reconstructed by grafting after various types of sacrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five cadaveric pelves were dissected bilaterally. The lengths and widths of the S1-S4 roots and their branches were measured. Then, the minimal and maximal defects between the proximal and distal stumps of the sacrificed roots were measured following 3 models of sacrectomy (below S2, below S1, and total sacrectomy).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean distance of the splanchnic nerves from the S2 and S3 anterior sacral foramina was 17.7 ± 7.3 and 23.6 ± 11.1 mm, respectively, and the mean distance of the pudendal S2 and S3 branches was 36.8 ± 13.7 and 30.2 ± 10.8 mm, respectively. The mean widths of the S2 and S3 roots were 9.3 ± 1.9 and 5.4 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. The mean maximal defects in S2 and S3 roots after various types of sacrectomies were between 61.8 ± 16.3 and 100.7 ± 14.3 mm and between 62.7 ± 20.2 and 84.7 ± 25.1 mm, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between sides or sexes for all obtained measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reconstruction of the S2-S3 roots is anatomically feasible after partial or total sacrectomies in which the resection of the soft tissue does not extend further than approximately 1.5 to 2 cm ventrally from the sacrum.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: En bloc sacrectomy is associated with sacral root transection causing loss of urinary bladder, rectum, and sexual function. The aim of the study was to determine the position of the pudendal branches (sensorimotor) and pelvic splanchnic nerves (parasympathetic) on the sacral roots relative to the sacrum, and the minimal and maximal defects in the sacral roots that can be reconstructed by grafting after various types of sacrectomy.

Methods: Five cadaveric pelves were dissected bilaterally. The lengths and widths of the S1-S4 roots and their branches were measured. Then, the minimal and maximal defects between the proximal and distal stumps of the sacrificed roots were measured following 3 models of sacrectomy (below S2, below S1, and total sacrectomy).

Results: The mean distance of the splanchnic nerves from the S2 and S3 anterior sacral foramina was 17.7 ± 7.3 and 23.6 ± 11.1 mm, respectively, and the mean distance of the pudendal S2 and S3 branches was 36.8 ± 13.7 and 30.2 ± 10.8 mm, respectively. The mean widths of the S2 and S3 roots were 9.3 ± 1.9 and 5.4 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. The mean maximal defects in S2 and S3 roots after various types of sacrectomies were between 61.8 ± 16.3 and 100.7 ± 14.3 mm and between 62.7 ± 20.2 and 84.7 ± 25.1 mm, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between sides or sexes for all obtained measurements.

Conclusion: The reconstruction of the S2-S3 roots is anatomically feasible after partial or total sacrectomies in which the resection of the soft tissue does not extend further than approximately 1.5 to 2 cm ventrally from the sacrum.

骶神经根的临床解剖及其与骶骨切除术后重建的相关性。
背景和目的:整体骶骨切除术与骶骨根横断有关,会导致膀胱、直肠和性功能丧失。该研究旨在确定骶根上的阴茎支(感觉神经)和骨盆脾神经(副交感神经)相对于骶骨的位置,以及各种骶骨切除术后可通过移植重建的骶根最小和最大缺损:方法:解剖五具尸体的双侧骶骨。测量 S1-S4 骶根及其分支的长度和宽度。然后,测量 3 种骶骨切除术(S2 以下、S1 以下和全骶骨切除术)后牺牲的根部近端和远端残端之间的最小和最大缺损:结果:脾神经与 S2 和 S3 骶前孔的平均距离分别为 17.7 ± 7.3 毫米和 23.6 ± 11.1 毫米,S2 和 S3 阴支的平均距离分别为 36.8 ± 13.7 毫米和 30.2 ± 10.8 毫米。S2 和 S3 根部的平均宽度分别为 9.3 ± 1.9 毫米和 5.4 ± 1.2 毫米。各种骶骨切除术后,S2和S3根部的平均最大缺损分别为(61.8 ± 16.3)至(100.7 ± 14.3)毫米和(62.7 ± 20.2)至(84.7 ± 25.1)毫米。在所有测量结果中,两侧或男女之间的差异均无统计学意义:结论:在骶骨部分或全部切除术后,如果切除的软组织不超过骶骨腹侧约1.5至2厘米,从解剖学角度看,S2-S3根的重建是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信