Uptake of Breast Cancer Screening Practices in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Reza Ebrahimoghli, Mir Hossein Aghaei, Saber Azami-Aghdash, Nehmat Houssami
{"title":"Uptake of Breast Cancer Screening Practices in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Reza Ebrahimoghli, Mir Hossein Aghaei, Saber Azami-Aghdash, Nehmat Houssami","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer worldwide and the leading cause of cancer mortality in women. Uptake of breast cancer screening and early-detection practices in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has not been synthesized. We aimed to systematically quantify uptake of breast cancer screening in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational population-based studies that reported the uptake of screening or early-detection practices. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Knowledge databases to January 2024. We pooled data using random-effects meta-analysis, and explored heterogeneity using subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>174 population-based studies encompassing >78 million women were included. Pooled prevalence of self-reported uptake of screening mammography, self-reported having had clinical breast examination for screening, and self-reported regular breast self-examination (relevant for breast awareness in LMICs) were 22.7% (95% CI: 18.6-27.2), 23.1% (95% CI: 19.5-27.0), and 14.6% (95% CI: 11.6-17.9) respectively. Uptake of breast cancer screening practices was lowest in Africa and low and lower-middle income countries. Uptake of breast cancer screening practices remained stable over time or slightly decreased. Women who lived in rural area, were single, had lower income level, had low educational attainment, were unemployed, were uninsured and had no family history of breast cancer were generally least likely to self-report uptake of breast cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis identified concerningly low uptake of breast cancer screening practices in LMICs. Governments should prioritize developing context-appropriate strategies to address this low uptake to support population-level stage-shifting of breast cancer in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14809,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae187","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer worldwide and the leading cause of cancer mortality in women. Uptake of breast cancer screening and early-detection practices in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has not been synthesized. We aimed to systematically quantify uptake of breast cancer screening in LMICs.

Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational population-based studies that reported the uptake of screening or early-detection practices. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Knowledge databases to January 2024. We pooled data using random-effects meta-analysis, and explored heterogeneity using subgroup analyses.

Findings: 174 population-based studies encompassing >78 million women were included. Pooled prevalence of self-reported uptake of screening mammography, self-reported having had clinical breast examination for screening, and self-reported regular breast self-examination (relevant for breast awareness in LMICs) were 22.7% (95% CI: 18.6-27.2), 23.1% (95% CI: 19.5-27.0), and 14.6% (95% CI: 11.6-17.9) respectively. Uptake of breast cancer screening practices was lowest in Africa and low and lower-middle income countries. Uptake of breast cancer screening practices remained stable over time or slightly decreased. Women who lived in rural area, were single, had lower income level, had low educational attainment, were unemployed, were uninsured and had no family history of breast cancer were generally least likely to self-report uptake of breast cancer screening.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis identified concerningly low uptake of breast cancer screening practices in LMICs. Governments should prioritize developing context-appropriate strategies to address this low uptake to support population-level stage-shifting of breast cancer in LMICs.

中低收入国家对乳腺癌筛查做法的接受程度:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:乳腺癌是全球发病率最高的癌症,也是女性癌症死亡的主要原因。目前尚未对中低收入国家(LMICs)的乳腺癌筛查率和早期发现率进行综合分析。我们旨在系统地量化中低收入国家的乳腺癌筛查率:我们对报告了筛查或早期检测方法接受率的基于人群的观察性研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们检索了截至 2024 年 1 月的 PubMed、Scopus、Embase 和 Web of Knowledge 数据库。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析对数据进行了汇总,并使用亚组分析探讨了异质性:共纳入了 174 项基于人群的研究,涵盖了超过 7 800 万名女性。自我报告接受乳腺放射摄影筛查、自我报告接受过临床乳腺检查筛查以及自我报告定期进行乳腺自我检查(与低收入和中等收入国家的乳腺意识相关)的汇总患病率分别为 22.7%(95% CI:18.6-27.2)、23.1%(95% CI:19.5-27.0)和 14.6%(95% CI:11.6-17.9)。非洲和中低收入国家的乳腺癌筛查率最低。随着时间的推移,乳腺癌筛查率保持稳定或略有下降。居住在农村地区、单身、收入水平较低、受教育程度低、失业、无保险和无乳腺癌家族史的妇女一般最不可能自我报告接受了乳腺癌筛查:这项荟萃分析发现,在低收入和中等收入国家,乳腺癌筛查的接受率低得令人担忧。各国政府应优先制定适合具体情况的战略,解决接受率低的问题,以支持低收入和中等收入国家人群乳腺癌的分期治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
203
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the National Cancer Institute is a reputable publication that undergoes a peer-review process. It is available in both print (ISSN: 0027-8874) and online (ISSN: 1460-2105) formats, with 12 issues released annually. The journal's primary aim is to disseminate innovative and important discoveries in the field of cancer research, with specific emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, behavioral, and health outcomes studies. Authors are encouraged to submit reviews, minireviews, and commentaries. The journal ensures that submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous and expedited review to publish scientifically and medically significant findings in a timely manner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信