A seed or soil problem in early endometriosis: stromal cell origin drives cellular invasion and coupling over mesothelial cell origin

Virginia-Arlene Go M.D. , Jeffery Chavez , Randal D. Robinson M.D. , Bruce J. Nicholson Ph.D.
{"title":"A seed or soil problem in early endometriosis: stromal cell origin drives cellular invasion and coupling over mesothelial cell origin","authors":"Virginia-Arlene Go M.D. ,&nbsp;Jeffery Chavez ,&nbsp;Randal D. Robinson M.D. ,&nbsp;Bruce J. Nicholson Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfss.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To study the role of the mesothelial cells in early endometriosis lesion formation by assessing in vitro cell-to-cell communication and invasion of endometrial cells across a mesothelial cell monolayer, with both cell types derived from both patients with endometriosis and control patients.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Laboratory-based experimental study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>University hospital and laboratory.</div></div><div><h3>Patient(s)</h3><div>Consenting reproductive-age women who underwent laparoscopy for gynecologic reasons and were confirmed to have either endometriosis with pathology tissue diagnosis (n = 8) or no endometriosis n = 8) at the time of surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Intervention(s)</h3><div>Primary stromal cells cultured from endometrial pipelle biopsies and primary mesothelial cells cultured from peritoneal explants were used in transmesothelial invasion assays and gap junction coupling assays.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure(s)</h3><div>Comparison of potential for lesion formation, using in vitro models, of both primary endometrial and mesothelial cells from patients with endometriosis and control patients, establishing the former as the primary disease driver.</div></div><div><h3>Result(s)</h3><div>When comparing mesothelial cells from control patients with those from patients with endometriosis, there was no significant difference in the amount of stromal cell invasion across either barrier. In contrast, when comparing stromal cell origin, the amount of invasion by endometriosis stromal cells was greater than control stromal cells regardless of whether the mesothelial cell monolayer was derived from patients with the disease or control patients. Additionally, primary mesothelial cells induced more gap junction coupling, a requirement for invasion, in stromal cells from patients with endometriosis than control patients, again independent of mesothelial origin. The notable exception was mesothelial cells derived from endometriotic lesion-affected areas that showed depressed ability to support invasion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><div>Although both endometrial and mesothelial cells need to function for establishment of endometriosis lesions, the endometrium seems to be the key player, serving as an ideal target for diagnostic strategies and therapeutic intervention. While this notion is consistent with previous studies, to our knowledge, we are the first to directly test both primary mesothelial and endometrial cells from patients with endometriosis and control patients to compare propensities for mesothelial invasion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73012,"journal":{"name":"F&S science","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 395-403"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F&S science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666335X24000533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To study the role of the mesothelial cells in early endometriosis lesion formation by assessing in vitro cell-to-cell communication and invasion of endometrial cells across a mesothelial cell monolayer, with both cell types derived from both patients with endometriosis and control patients.

Design

Laboratory-based experimental study.

Setting

University hospital and laboratory.

Patient(s)

Consenting reproductive-age women who underwent laparoscopy for gynecologic reasons and were confirmed to have either endometriosis with pathology tissue diagnosis (n = 8) or no endometriosis n = 8) at the time of surgery.

Intervention(s)

Primary stromal cells cultured from endometrial pipelle biopsies and primary mesothelial cells cultured from peritoneal explants were used in transmesothelial invasion assays and gap junction coupling assays.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Comparison of potential for lesion formation, using in vitro models, of both primary endometrial and mesothelial cells from patients with endometriosis and control patients, establishing the former as the primary disease driver.

Result(s)

When comparing mesothelial cells from control patients with those from patients with endometriosis, there was no significant difference in the amount of stromal cell invasion across either barrier. In contrast, when comparing stromal cell origin, the amount of invasion by endometriosis stromal cells was greater than control stromal cells regardless of whether the mesothelial cell monolayer was derived from patients with the disease or control patients. Additionally, primary mesothelial cells induced more gap junction coupling, a requirement for invasion, in stromal cells from patients with endometriosis than control patients, again independent of mesothelial origin. The notable exception was mesothelial cells derived from endometriotic lesion-affected areas that showed depressed ability to support invasion.

Conclusion(s)

Although both endometrial and mesothelial cells need to function for establishment of endometriosis lesions, the endometrium seems to be the key player, serving as an ideal target for diagnostic strategies and therapeutic intervention. While this notion is consistent with previous studies, to our knowledge, we are the first to directly test both primary mesothelial and endometrial cells from patients with endometriosis and control patients to compare propensities for mesothelial invasion.
早期子宫内膜异位症中的种子或土壤问题:基质细胞来源比间皮细胞来源更能驱动细胞入侵和耦合。
研究目的通过评估子宫内膜异位症患者和对照组患者的两种细胞类型的体外细胞间通讯和子宫内膜细胞侵入间皮细胞单层的情况,研究间皮细胞在早期子宫内膜异位症病变形成中的作用:设计:基于实验室的实验研究 设置:大学医院和实验室患者:同意接受腹腔镜妇科检查的育龄妇女,手术时经病理组织诊断确认患有子宫内膜异位症(8 人)或无子宫内膜异位症(8 人):利用子宫内膜管活检培养的原代基质细胞和腹膜外植体培养的原代间皮细胞进行跨间皮细胞侵袭试验和间隙连接试验。主要结果:利用体外模型比较子宫内膜异位症患者和对照组患者的原代子宫内膜细胞和间皮细胞形成病变的可能性,确定前者是主要的疾病驱动因素:结果:将对照组患者的间皮细胞与子宫内膜异位症患者的间皮细胞进行比较时,基质细胞跨屏障入侵的数量没有明显差异。相反,在比较基质细胞来源时,无论间皮细胞单层是来自疾病患者还是对照组患者,子宫内膜异位症基质细胞的侵袭量都大于对照组基质细胞。此外,原发性间皮细胞诱导子宫内膜异位症基质细胞的间隙连接(侵袭所需的条件)多于对照组患者,这同样与间皮细胞来源无关。值得注意的例外是,来自子宫内膜异位症病变影响区的间皮细胞支持侵袭的能力较低:结论:虽然子宫内膜和间皮细胞都需要发挥作用才能形成子宫内膜异位症病灶,但子宫内膜似乎是关键角色,是诊断策略和治疗干预的理想目标。这一观点与之前的研究一致,但我们是首次直接检测子宫内膜异位症患者和对照组患者的原始间皮细胞和子宫内膜细胞,以比较间皮细胞入侵的倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F&S science
F&S science Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Urology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信