Disorders of compulsivity: Deficits in arbitrating learning strategies

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Zhongqiang Ruan, Shilin Liu, Yu an Liu, Qiong Yang, Ziwen Peng
{"title":"Disorders of compulsivity: Deficits in arbitrating learning strategies","authors":"Zhongqiang Ruan,&nbsp;Shilin Liu,&nbsp;Yu an Liu,&nbsp;Qiong Yang,&nbsp;Ziwen Peng","doi":"10.1111/adb.13433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While previous research has shown that compulsivity is related to an imbalance between goal-directed and habitual learning systems, very little is known about whether this effect is due to the impairment of a single system or the impairment of the arbitration mechanism that determines which system controls behaviour at any given moment; the current study aims to address this disagreement. Nineteen alcohol use disorder, 30 obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and 20 major depressive disorder patients and corresponding sex- and age-matched controls performed two-choice, three-stage Markov decision-making paradigm. Model-based and mode-free reinforcement learning models were used to independently fitted their behavioural data. Alcohol use disorder and OCD patients showed less model-based strategy choice than healthy controls in task conditions where the model-based strategy was optimal. Only OCD patients showed higher behavioural control system switching in task conditions where model-free use was optimal. Major depressive disorder patients did not differ from the matched control in both. These findings suggest that dysfunction in arbitration control between dual systems may be the basis for diverse disorders involving compulsivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7289,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Biology","volume":"29 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315606/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adb.13433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While previous research has shown that compulsivity is related to an imbalance between goal-directed and habitual learning systems, very little is known about whether this effect is due to the impairment of a single system or the impairment of the arbitration mechanism that determines which system controls behaviour at any given moment; the current study aims to address this disagreement. Nineteen alcohol use disorder, 30 obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and 20 major depressive disorder patients and corresponding sex- and age-matched controls performed two-choice, three-stage Markov decision-making paradigm. Model-based and mode-free reinforcement learning models were used to independently fitted their behavioural data. Alcohol use disorder and OCD patients showed less model-based strategy choice than healthy controls in task conditions where the model-based strategy was optimal. Only OCD patients showed higher behavioural control system switching in task conditions where model-free use was optimal. Major depressive disorder patients did not differ from the matched control in both. These findings suggest that dysfunction in arbitration control between dual systems may be the basis for diverse disorders involving compulsivity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

强迫症:仲裁学习策略的缺陷。
以往的研究表明,强迫症与目标导向学习系统和习惯性学习系统之间的不平衡有关,但对于这种影响是由于单一系统受损还是由于决定在任何特定时刻由哪个系统控制行为的仲裁机制受损,目前所知甚少;本研究旨在解决这一分歧。19名酒精使用障碍患者、30名强迫症患者和20名重度抑郁症患者以及相应的性别和年龄匹配的对照组进行了二选一的三阶段马尔可夫决策范式。基于模型的强化学习模型和无模式强化学习模型分别用于拟合他们的行为数据。与健康对照组相比,酒精使用障碍和强迫症患者在基于模型的策略为最优的任务条件下,表现出较少的基于模型的策略选择。只有强迫症患者在无模型使用为最优的任务条件下表现出较高的行为控制系统转换能力。重度抑郁症患者在这两方面与匹配的对照组没有差异。这些研究结果表明,双系统之间的仲裁控制功能障碍可能是各种强迫症的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addiction Biology
Addiction Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
118
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Biology is focused on neuroscience contributions and it aims to advance our understanding of the action of drugs of abuse and addictive processes. Papers are accepted in both animal experimentation or clinical research. The content is geared towards behavioral, molecular, genetic, biochemical, neuro-biological and pharmacology aspects of these fields. Addiction Biology includes peer-reviewed original research reports and reviews. Addiction Biology is published on behalf of the Society for the Study of Addiction to Alcohol and other Drugs (SSA). Members of the Society for the Study of Addiction receive the Journal as part of their annual membership subscription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信