Disparities in hepatitis B virus healthcare service access among marginalised poor populations: a mixed-method systematic review.

IF 8.1 1区 医学
Caixia Li, Dejina Thapa, Qian Mi, Yuanxiu Gao, Xia Fu
{"title":"Disparities in hepatitis B virus healthcare service access among marginalised poor populations: a mixed-method systematic review.","authors":"Caixia Li, Dejina Thapa, Qian Mi, Yuanxiu Gao, Xia Fu","doi":"10.1186/s40249-024-01225-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Marginalised poor populations, characterised by poverty and social exclusion, suffer disproportionately from hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections and encounter substantial disparities in access to healthcare. This has further exacerbated the global HBV burden and precluded progress towards HBV elimination. This mixed-method systematic review aimed to synthesise their utilisation and influencing factors in HBV healthcare services, including screening, vaccination, treatment, and linkage-to-care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven databases were searched from their inception to May 4, 2023. Quantitative and qualitative studies examining the factors influencing HBV healthcare access among marginalised poor populations were included. A meta-analysis was conducted to synthesise the pooled rates of HBV healthcare utilisation. The factors influencing utilisation were integrated and visualised using a health disparity research framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies were included involving 13,171 marginalised poor individuals: sex workers, rural migrant workers, irregular immigrants, homeless adults, and underprivileged individuals. Their utilisation of HBV healthcare ranged from 1.5% to 27.5%. Meta-analysis showed that the pooled rate of at least one dose of the HBV vaccine barely reached 37% (95% confidence interval: 0.26‒0.49). Fifty-one influencing factors were identified, with sociocultural factors (n = 19) being the most frequently reported, followed by behavioural (n = 14) and healthcare system factors (n = 11). Socio-cultural barriers included immigration status, prison history, illegal work, and HBV discrimination. Behavioural domain factors, including previous testing for sexually transmitted diseases, residential drug treatment, and problem-solving coping, facilitated HBV healthcare access, whereas hostility coping exerted negative influences. Healthcare system facilitators comprised HBV health literacy, beliefs, and physician recommendations, whereas barriers included service inaccessibility and insurance inadequacies. The biological and physical/built environments were the least studied domains, highlighting that geographical mobility, shelter capacity, and access to humanitarian health centres affect HBV healthcare for marginalised poor populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Marginalised poor populations encounter substantial disparities in accessing HBV healthcare, highlighting the need for a synergistic management approach, including deploying health education initiatives to debunk HBV misperceptions, developing integrated HBV management systems for continuous tracking, conducting tailored community outreach programmes, and establishing a human rights-based policy framework to guarantee the unfettered access of marginalised poor populations to essential HBV services.</p>","PeriodicalId":48820,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11312201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases of Poverty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-024-01225-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Marginalised poor populations, characterised by poverty and social exclusion, suffer disproportionately from hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections and encounter substantial disparities in access to healthcare. This has further exacerbated the global HBV burden and precluded progress towards HBV elimination. This mixed-method systematic review aimed to synthesise their utilisation and influencing factors in HBV healthcare services, including screening, vaccination, treatment, and linkage-to-care.

Methods: Eleven databases were searched from their inception to May 4, 2023. Quantitative and qualitative studies examining the factors influencing HBV healthcare access among marginalised poor populations were included. A meta-analysis was conducted to synthesise the pooled rates of HBV healthcare utilisation. The factors influencing utilisation were integrated and visualised using a health disparity research framework.

Results: Twenty-one studies were included involving 13,171 marginalised poor individuals: sex workers, rural migrant workers, irregular immigrants, homeless adults, and underprivileged individuals. Their utilisation of HBV healthcare ranged from 1.5% to 27.5%. Meta-analysis showed that the pooled rate of at least one dose of the HBV vaccine barely reached 37% (95% confidence interval: 0.26‒0.49). Fifty-one influencing factors were identified, with sociocultural factors (n = 19) being the most frequently reported, followed by behavioural (n = 14) and healthcare system factors (n = 11). Socio-cultural barriers included immigration status, prison history, illegal work, and HBV discrimination. Behavioural domain factors, including previous testing for sexually transmitted diseases, residential drug treatment, and problem-solving coping, facilitated HBV healthcare access, whereas hostility coping exerted negative influences. Healthcare system facilitators comprised HBV health literacy, beliefs, and physician recommendations, whereas barriers included service inaccessibility and insurance inadequacies. The biological and physical/built environments were the least studied domains, highlighting that geographical mobility, shelter capacity, and access to humanitarian health centres affect HBV healthcare for marginalised poor populations.

Conclusions: Marginalised poor populations encounter substantial disparities in accessing HBV healthcare, highlighting the need for a synergistic management approach, including deploying health education initiatives to debunk HBV misperceptions, developing integrated HBV management systems for continuous tracking, conducting tailored community outreach programmes, and establishing a human rights-based policy framework to guarantee the unfettered access of marginalised poor populations to essential HBV services.

边缘化贫困人口在获得乙型肝炎病毒医疗服务方面的差异:混合方法系统综述。
背景:以贫困和社会排斥为特征的边缘化贫困人口感染乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)的比例特别高,而且在获得医疗保健服务方面存在巨大差异。这进一步加剧了全球 HBV 负担,阻碍了消除 HBV 的进程。这篇混合方法的系统综述旨在综合HBV医疗保健服务中的利用率和影响因素,包括筛查、疫苗接种、治疗和护理链接:方法:检索了从开始到 2023 年 5 月 4 日的 11 个数据库。方法:从 2023 年 5 月 4 日开始,检索了 11 个数据库,其中包括对影响边缘化贫困人群获得 HBV 医疗服务的因素进行研究的定量和定性研究。进行了一项荟萃分析,以综合汇集的 HBV 医疗保健利用率。利用健康差异研究框架对影响利用率的因素进行了整合和可视化:共纳入 21 项研究,涉及 13171 名边缘化贫困人口:性工作者、农村移民工人、非法移民、无家可归的成年人和贫困人口。他们使用 HBV 医疗服务的比例从 1.5% 到 27.5% 不等。Meta 分析表明,至少接种过一剂 HBV 疫苗的总接种率仅为 37%(95% 置信区间:0.26-0.49)。研究发现了 51 个影响因素,其中社会文化因素(19 个)是最常见的因素,其次是行为因素(14 个)和医疗系统因素(11 个)。社会文化障碍包括移民身份、监狱历史、非法工作和 HBV 歧视。行为领域的因素包括既往的性传播疾病检测、住院戒毒治疗和解决问题的应对方法,这些因素为 HBV 患者获得医疗服务提供了便利,而敌意应对方法则产生了负面影响。医疗保健系统的促进因素包括 HBV 健康知识、信仰和医生建议,而障碍则包括服务不便和保险不足。生物环境和物理/建筑环境是研究最少的领域,这凸显出地理流动性、住房容量和人道主义医疗中心的可及性影响着边缘化贫困人口的乙肝病毒医疗保健:结论:边缘化贫困人口在获得乙型肝炎病毒医疗保健服务方面存在巨大差异,因此需要采取协同管理方法,包括开展健康教育活动以消除对乙型肝炎病毒的误解、开发用于持续跟踪的乙型肝炎病毒综合管理系统、开展有针对性的社区外联计划,以及建立以人权为基础的政策框架以保证边缘化贫困人口能够不受阻碍地获得基本的乙型肝炎病毒服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
Infectious Diseases of Poverty INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
自引率
1.20%
发文量
368
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases of Poverty is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on addressing essential public health questions related to infectious diseases of poverty. The journal covers a wide range of topics including the biology of pathogens and vectors, diagnosis and detection, treatment and case management, epidemiology and modeling, zoonotic hosts and animal reservoirs, control strategies and implementation, new technologies and application. It also considers the transdisciplinary or multisectoral effects on health systems, ecohealth, environmental management, and innovative technology. The journal aims to identify and assess research and information gaps that hinder progress towards new interventions for public health problems in the developing world. Additionally, it provides a platform for discussing these issues to advance research and evidence building for improved public health interventions in poor settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信