Evaluation of deep learning for predicting rice traits using structural and single-nucleotide genomic variants.

IF 4.7 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Ioanna-Theoni Vourlaki, Sebastián E Ramos-Onsins, Miguel Pérez-Enciso, Raúl Castanera
{"title":"Evaluation of deep learning for predicting rice traits using structural and single-nucleotide genomic variants.","authors":"Ioanna-Theoni Vourlaki, Sebastián E Ramos-Onsins, Miguel Pérez-Enciso, Raúl Castanera","doi":"10.1186/s13007-024-01250-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Structural genomic variants (SVs) are prevalent in plant genomes and have played an important role in evolution and domestication, as they constitute a significant source of genomic and phenotypic variability. Nevertheless, most methods in quantitative genetics focusing on crop improvement, such as genomic prediction, consider only Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs). Deep Learning (DL) is a promising strategy for genomic prediction, but its performance using SVs and SNPs as genetic markers remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We used rice to investigate whether combining SVs and SNPs can result in better trait prediction over SNPs alone and examine the potential advantage of Deep Learning (DL) networks over Bayesian Linear models. Specifically, the performances of BayesC (considering additive effects) and a Bayesian Reproducible Kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) regression (considering both additive and non-additive effects) were compared to those of two different DL architectures, the Multilayer Perceptron, and the Convolution Neural Network, to explore their prediction ability by using various marker input strategies. We found that exploiting structural and nucleotide variation slightly improved prediction ability on complex traits in 87% of the cases. DL models outperformed Bayesian models in 75% of the studied cases, considering the four traits and the two validation strategies used. Finally, DL systematically improved prediction ability of binary traits against the Bayesian models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study reveals that the use of structural genomic variants can improve trait prediction in rice, independently of the methodology used. Also, our results suggest that Deep Learning (DL) networks can perform better than Bayesian models in the prediction of binary traits, and in quantitative traits when the training and target sets are not closely related. This highlights the potential of DL to enhance crop improvement in specific scenarios and the importance to consider SVs in addition to SNPs in genomic selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":20100,"journal":{"name":"Plant Methods","volume":"20 1","pages":"121"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-024-01250-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Structural genomic variants (SVs) are prevalent in plant genomes and have played an important role in evolution and domestication, as they constitute a significant source of genomic and phenotypic variability. Nevertheless, most methods in quantitative genetics focusing on crop improvement, such as genomic prediction, consider only Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs). Deep Learning (DL) is a promising strategy for genomic prediction, but its performance using SVs and SNPs as genetic markers remains unknown.

Results: We used rice to investigate whether combining SVs and SNPs can result in better trait prediction over SNPs alone and examine the potential advantage of Deep Learning (DL) networks over Bayesian Linear models. Specifically, the performances of BayesC (considering additive effects) and a Bayesian Reproducible Kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) regression (considering both additive and non-additive effects) were compared to those of two different DL architectures, the Multilayer Perceptron, and the Convolution Neural Network, to explore their prediction ability by using various marker input strategies. We found that exploiting structural and nucleotide variation slightly improved prediction ability on complex traits in 87% of the cases. DL models outperformed Bayesian models in 75% of the studied cases, considering the four traits and the two validation strategies used. Finally, DL systematically improved prediction ability of binary traits against the Bayesian models.

Conclusions: Our study reveals that the use of structural genomic variants can improve trait prediction in rice, independently of the methodology used. Also, our results suggest that Deep Learning (DL) networks can perform better than Bayesian models in the prediction of binary traits, and in quantitative traits when the training and target sets are not closely related. This highlights the potential of DL to enhance crop improvement in specific scenarios and the importance to consider SVs in addition to SNPs in genomic selection.

利用结构和单核苷酸基因组变异预测水稻性状的深度学习评估。
背景:结构基因组变异(SV)普遍存在于植物基因组中,在进化和驯化过程中发挥着重要作用,因为它们是基因组和表型变异的重要来源。然而,以作物改良为重点的定量遗传学中的大多数方法(如基因组预测)都只考虑单核苷酸多态性(SNP)。深度学习(DL)是一种很有前途的基因组预测策略,但它在使用 SV 和 SNP 作为遗传标记时的性能仍是未知数:我们利用水稻研究了结合 SVs 和 SNPs 是否能比单独使用 SNPs 更好地预测性状,并考察了深度学习(DL)网络相对于贝叶斯线性模型的潜在优势。具体来说,我们将 BayesC(考虑加性效应)和贝叶斯可重现核希尔伯特空间(RKHS)回归(考虑加性和非加性效应)的性能与两种不同的深度学习架构(多层感知器和卷积神经网络)的性能进行了比较,以探索它们在使用各种标记输入策略时的预测能力。我们发现,在 87% 的情况下,利用结构和核苷酸变异可略微提高对复杂性状的预测能力。考虑到所使用的四种性状和两种验证策略,DL 模型在 75% 的研究案例中优于贝叶斯模型。最后,与贝叶斯模型相比,DL 系统地提高了二元性状的预测能力:我们的研究表明,使用结构基因组变异可以改善水稻的性状预测,与使用的方法无关。此外,我们的研究结果表明,深度学习(DL)网络在预测二元性状和定量性状时,当训练集和目标集不是密切相关时,其表现优于贝叶斯模型。这凸显了深度学习网络在特定情况下提高作物改良能力的潜力,以及在基因组选择中除了考虑SNPs外还考虑SVs的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Methods
Plant Methods 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.90%
发文量
121
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Plant Methods is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal for the plant research community that encompasses all aspects of technological innovation in the plant sciences. There is no doubt that we have entered an exciting new era in plant biology. The completion of the Arabidopsis genome sequence, and the rapid progress being made in other plant genomics projects are providing unparalleled opportunities for progress in all areas of plant science. Nevertheless, enormous challenges lie ahead if we are to understand the function of every gene in the genome, and how the individual parts work together to make the whole organism. Achieving these goals will require an unprecedented collaborative effort, combining high-throughput, system-wide technologies with more focused approaches that integrate traditional disciplines such as cell biology, biochemistry and molecular genetics. Technological innovation is probably the most important catalyst for progress in any scientific discipline. Plant Methods’ goal is to stimulate the development and adoption of new and improved techniques and research tools and, where appropriate, to promote consistency of methodologies for better integration of data from different laboratories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信