Pollinator response to livestock grazing: implications for rangeland conservation in sagebrush ecosystems.

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Hayes B Goosey, Gabrielle E Blanchette, David E Naugle
{"title":"Pollinator response to livestock grazing: implications for rangeland conservation in sagebrush ecosystems.","authors":"Hayes B Goosey, Gabrielle E Blanchette, David E Naugle","doi":"10.1093/jisesa/ieae069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>World food supplies rely on pollination, making this plant-animal relationship a highly valued ecosystem service. Bees pollinate flowering plants in rangelands that constitute up to half of global terrestrial vegetation. Livestock grazing is the most widespread rangeland use and can affect insect pollinators through herbivory. We examined management effects on bee abundance and other insect pollinators on grazed and idle sagebrush rangelands in central Montana, USA. From 2016 to 2018, we sampled pollinators on lands enrolled in rest-rotation grazing, unenrolled grazing lands, and geographically separate idle lands without grazing for over a decade. Bare ground covered twice as much area (15% vs. 7) with half the litter (12% vs. 24) on grazed than idle regardless of enrollment. Bee pollinators were 2-3 times more prevalent in grazed than idle in 2016-2017. In 2018, bees were similar among grazed and idled during an unseasonably wet and cool summer that depressed pollinator catches; captures of secondary pollinators was similar among treatments 2 of 3 study years. Ground-nesting bees (94.6% of total bee abundance) were driven by periodic grazing that maintained bare ground and kept litter accumulations in check. In contrast, idle provided fewer nesting opportunities for bees that were mostly solitary, ground-nesting genera requiring unvegetated spaces for reproduction. Managed lands supported higher bee abundance that evolved with bison grazing on the eastern edge of the sagebrush ecosystem. Our findings suggest that periodic disturbance may enhance pollinator habitat, and that rangelands may benefit from periodic grazing by livestock.</p>","PeriodicalId":16156,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Insect Science","volume":"24 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Insect Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieae069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

World food supplies rely on pollination, making this plant-animal relationship a highly valued ecosystem service. Bees pollinate flowering plants in rangelands that constitute up to half of global terrestrial vegetation. Livestock grazing is the most widespread rangeland use and can affect insect pollinators through herbivory. We examined management effects on bee abundance and other insect pollinators on grazed and idle sagebrush rangelands in central Montana, USA. From 2016 to 2018, we sampled pollinators on lands enrolled in rest-rotation grazing, unenrolled grazing lands, and geographically separate idle lands without grazing for over a decade. Bare ground covered twice as much area (15% vs. 7) with half the litter (12% vs. 24) on grazed than idle regardless of enrollment. Bee pollinators were 2-3 times more prevalent in grazed than idle in 2016-2017. In 2018, bees were similar among grazed and idled during an unseasonably wet and cool summer that depressed pollinator catches; captures of secondary pollinators was similar among treatments 2 of 3 study years. Ground-nesting bees (94.6% of total bee abundance) were driven by periodic grazing that maintained bare ground and kept litter accumulations in check. In contrast, idle provided fewer nesting opportunities for bees that were mostly solitary, ground-nesting genera requiring unvegetated spaces for reproduction. Managed lands supported higher bee abundance that evolved with bison grazing on the eastern edge of the sagebrush ecosystem. Our findings suggest that periodic disturbance may enhance pollinator habitat, and that rangelands may benefit from periodic grazing by livestock.

传粉昆虫对牲畜放牧的反应:对鼠尾草生态系统牧场保护的影响。
世界粮食供应依赖于授粉,因此这种植物与动物之间的关系是一种非常有价值的生态系统服务。蜜蜂为占全球陆地植被一半的牧场中的开花植物授粉。牲畜放牧是最普遍的牧场使用方式,会通过食草影响昆虫授粉者。我们考察了美国蒙大拿州中部放牧和闲置的鼠尾草牧场对蜜蜂数量和其他昆虫授粉者的管理影响。从 2016 年到 2018 年,我们对参加休牧轮牧的土地、未参加轮牧的土地以及地理上独立的十多年未放牧的闲置土地上的传粉昆虫进行了采样。无论登记与否,放牧地的裸地覆盖面积是闲置地的两倍(15% 对 7),垃圾量是闲置地的一半(12% 对 24)。2016-2017 年,蜜蜂授粉者在放牧地的数量是闲置地的 2-3 倍。2018 年,在一个反常的潮湿凉爽的夏季,蜜蜂在放牧地和闲置地的数量相近,这使得授粉昆虫的捕获量下降;在 3 个研究年中的 2 个年头,各处理对次生授粉昆虫的捕获量相近。地面筑巢的蜜蜂(占蜜蜂总数量的 94.6%)受到定期放牧的驱动,放牧可保持裸露的地面并控制垃圾的堆积。与此相反,闲置土地为蜜蜂提供的筑巢机会较少,而蜜蜂大多是独居的地巢蜂属,需要无植被的空间进行繁殖。随着野牛在鼠尾草生态系统东部边缘放牧,人工管理的土地支持了更高的蜜蜂丰度。我们的研究结果表明,周期性干扰可能会改善授粉者的栖息地,牧场可能会从牲畜的周期性放牧中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Insect Science
Journal of Insect Science 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Insect Science was founded with support from the University of Arizona library in 2001 by Dr. Henry Hagedorn, who served as editor-in-chief until his death in January 2014. The Entomological Society of America was very pleased to add the Journal of Insect Science to its publishing portfolio in 2014. The fully open access journal publishes papers in all aspects of the biology of insects and other arthropods from the molecular to the ecological, and their agricultural and medical impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信