{"title":"Unique enlargement of human soleus muscle for bipedalism at the expense of the ease of leg swing","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Humans exhibit unique skeletal muscle morphologies that are known to matter in upright bipedalism. However, their relevance to the ease of leg swing, which limits locomotion performance, remains unclear. Here, we aimed to examine muscle mass distribution within the human leg and the effect of each muscle on the ease of leg swing. We calculated the mass, center of mass position, and moment of inertia around the hip extension-flexion axis for all leg muscles by using a publicly available dataset of the 3D reconstruction of the musculoskeletal components in human male and female legs. The leg muscles showed a top-heavy-bottom-light tapering trend; muscles far from the hip joint tended to have smaller masses. Interestingly, however, the soleus exhibited sizable mass for its location. Consequently, the moment of inertia of the soleus was exceptionally greatest, accounting for approximately one-quarter of that of all muscles. These results indicate that compared to the other muscles the soleus muscle has a much larger effect on the leg moment of inertia and uniquely makes humans difficult to swing the leg, although the leg muscles basically show the top-heavy bottom-light tapering trend favoring the leg swing. Our findings highlight a novel functional consequence of human body evolution, suggesting that muscular enlargement for postural stability and endurance capacity has compromised the locomotion speed during the adaptation to bipedalism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024003415/pdfft?md5=ff0fc3ae32bb5b8901ef0cc99f6ed837&pid=1-s2.0-S0021929024003415-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024003415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Humans exhibit unique skeletal muscle morphologies that are known to matter in upright bipedalism. However, their relevance to the ease of leg swing, which limits locomotion performance, remains unclear. Here, we aimed to examine muscle mass distribution within the human leg and the effect of each muscle on the ease of leg swing. We calculated the mass, center of mass position, and moment of inertia around the hip extension-flexion axis for all leg muscles by using a publicly available dataset of the 3D reconstruction of the musculoskeletal components in human male and female legs. The leg muscles showed a top-heavy-bottom-light tapering trend; muscles far from the hip joint tended to have smaller masses. Interestingly, however, the soleus exhibited sizable mass for its location. Consequently, the moment of inertia of the soleus was exceptionally greatest, accounting for approximately one-quarter of that of all muscles. These results indicate that compared to the other muscles the soleus muscle has a much larger effect on the leg moment of inertia and uniquely makes humans difficult to swing the leg, although the leg muscles basically show the top-heavy bottom-light tapering trend favoring the leg swing. Our findings highlight a novel functional consequence of human body evolution, suggesting that muscular enlargement for postural stability and endurance capacity has compromised the locomotion speed during the adaptation to bipedalism.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.