Health insurance and transportation barriers impact access to epilepsy care in the United States

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brad K. Kamitaki , Shelly Maniar , Raaga Rambhatla , Kelly Gao , Joel C. Cantor , Hyunmi Choi , Michelle T. Bover Manderski
{"title":"Health insurance and transportation barriers impact access to epilepsy care in the United States","authors":"Brad K. Kamitaki ,&nbsp;Shelly Maniar ,&nbsp;Raaga Rambhatla ,&nbsp;Kelly Gao ,&nbsp;Joel C. Cantor ,&nbsp;Hyunmi Choi ,&nbsp;Michelle T. Bover Manderski","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Inconsistent access to healthcare for people with epilepsy results in reduced adherence to antiseizure medications, increased seizure frequency, and fewer appropriate referrals for epilepsy surgery. Identifying and addressing factors that impede access to care should consequently improve patient outcomes. We hypothesized that health insurance and transportation affect access to outpatient neurology care for adults living with epilepsy in the United States (US).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of US adults with active epilepsy surveyed via the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) in 2015 and 2017. We established whether patients reported seeing a neurologist in the past year and used multiple logistic regression to determine whether health insurance status and transportation access were associated with this outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 735 respondents from 2015 and 2017, representing an estimated 2.98 million US adults with active epilepsy. After adjusting for socioeconomic and seizure-related co-variates, we found that a lack of health insurance coverage was associated with no epilepsy care in the past year (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.22; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.09 – 0.54). Delayed care due to inadequate transportation (aOR 0.42; 95 % CI: 0.19 – 0.93) also resulted in reduced patient access to a neurologist.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Due to the inherent nature of their condition, people with epilepsy are less likely to have employer-sponsored health insurance or consistent driving privileges. Yet, these factors also impact patient access to neurological care. We must address transportation and insurance barriers through long-term investment and partnership between community, healthcare, and government stakeholders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 107424"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124001396/pdfft?md5=97c63540da7eb99ec79217663fd736be&pid=1-s2.0-S0920121124001396-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124001396","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Inconsistent access to healthcare for people with epilepsy results in reduced adherence to antiseizure medications, increased seizure frequency, and fewer appropriate referrals for epilepsy surgery. Identifying and addressing factors that impede access to care should consequently improve patient outcomes. We hypothesized that health insurance and transportation affect access to outpatient neurology care for adults living with epilepsy in the United States (US).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of US adults with active epilepsy surveyed via the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) in 2015 and 2017. We established whether patients reported seeing a neurologist in the past year and used multiple logistic regression to determine whether health insurance status and transportation access were associated with this outcome.

Results

We identified 735 respondents from 2015 and 2017, representing an estimated 2.98 million US adults with active epilepsy. After adjusting for socioeconomic and seizure-related co-variates, we found that a lack of health insurance coverage was associated with no epilepsy care in the past year (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.22; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.09 – 0.54). Delayed care due to inadequate transportation (aOR 0.42; 95 % CI: 0.19 – 0.93) also resulted in reduced patient access to a neurologist.

Conclusion

Due to the inherent nature of their condition, people with epilepsy are less likely to have employer-sponsored health insurance or consistent driving privileges. Yet, these factors also impact patient access to neurological care. We must address transportation and insurance barriers through long-term investment and partnership between community, healthcare, and government stakeholders.

在美国,医疗保险和交通障碍影响了癫痫护理的获得。
目的:癫痫患者获得医疗保健的途径不一致会导致对抗癫痫药物的依从性降低、癫痫发作频率增加以及癫痫手术的适当转诊减少。找出并解决阻碍患者获得医疗服务的因素应能改善患者的治疗效果。我们假设,医疗保险和交通会影响美国成年癫痫患者获得神经内科门诊治疗:我们对 2015 年和 2017 年通过全国健康访谈调查(NHIS)接受调查的美国成年活动性癫痫患者进行了一项回顾性横断面研究。我们确定了患者是否报告在过去一年中看过神经科医生,并使用多元逻辑回归法确定医疗保险状况和交通便利程度是否与这一结果相关:我们确定了 2015 年和 2017 年的 735 名受访者,他们代表了约 298 万名患有活动性癫痫的美国成年人。在调整了社会经济和癫痫发作相关的协变量后,我们发现,缺乏医疗保险与过去一年中未接受癫痫治疗有关(调整后的赔率比 [aOR] 0.22;95 % 置信区间 [CI]:0.09 - 0.54)。由于交通不便而延误治疗(aOR 0.42;95 % 置信区间 [CI]:0.19 - 0.93)也导致患者看神经科医生的机会减少:结论:由于癫痫病的固有性质,癫痫患者不太可能拥有雇主赞助的医疗保险或稳定的驾驶特权。然而,这些因素也会影响患者获得神经科护理。我们必须通过长期投资以及社区、医疗保健和政府利益相关者之间的合作来解决交通和保险方面的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsy Research
Epilepsy Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy Research provides for publication of high quality articles in both basic and clinical epilepsy research, with a special emphasis on translational research that ultimately relates to epilepsy as a human condition. The journal is intended to provide a forum for reporting the best and most rigorous epilepsy research from all disciplines ranging from biophysics and molecular biology to epidemiological and psychosocial research. As such the journal will publish original papers relevant to epilepsy from any scientific discipline and also studies of a multidisciplinary nature. Clinical and experimental research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches to the study of epilepsy and its treatment are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant clinical or experimental relevance, and interest to a multidisciplinary audience in the broad arena of epilepsy. Review articles focused on any topic of epilepsy research will also be considered, but only if they present an exceptionally clear synthesis of current knowledge and future directions of a research area, based on a critical assessment of the available data or on hypotheses that are likely to stimulate more critical thinking and further advances in an area of epilepsy research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信