Prevalence of and risk factors for endometrial polyps among asymptomatic postmenopausal women with uterovaginal prolapse.

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gabriela M Weigel, George N Baison, Linda Mihalov, Tariro Mupombwa
{"title":"Prevalence of and risk factors for endometrial polyps among asymptomatic postmenopausal women with uterovaginal prolapse.","authors":"Gabriela M Weigel, George N Baison, Linda Mihalov, Tariro Mupombwa","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of endometrial polyps among asymptomatic, postmenopausal women is not well defined. There is no clear clinical consensus on how to manage endometrial polyps in this population and whether these polyps truly are a cause for clinical concern.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of endometrial polyps among asymptomatic (without bleeding), postmenopausal women and to evaluate risk factors associated with their presence.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This cross-sectional study assessed the prevalence of endometrial polyps among asymptomatic, postmenopausal women who underwent a hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse. Patients were excluded if they underwent a hysterectomy for other indications, including postmenopausal bleeding. Following chart review, eligible patients who received care at a single site in Washington state from 2009 to 2018 were included. The primary outcome was the presence of endometrial polyps on pathology. Risk factors associated with polyp prevalence were subsequently assessed using univariate analysis and multivariate regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 317 eligible women identified, endometrial polyps were identified in 106 women (33.4%). The average polyp size and endometrial thickness was 13±10 mm and 1.4±1.5 mm, respectively. Most cases (78%) had solitary polyps. Premalignant and malignant lesions were found in 2 cases (1.89%); 1 had endometrial carcinoma and 1 had endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics were similar between patients with and those without endometrial polyps, including the presence of fibroids, endometriosis, and adenomyosis. A multivariate logistic regression showed that the presence of polyps was independently associated with a high body mass index (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.12; P=.02) and use of menopausal hormone therapy (odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.72; P=.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Asymptomatic postmenopausal women who underwent hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse exhibited a high prevalence of endometrial polyps. Those who used menopausal hormone therapy and who had a high body mass index were at a higher risk for developing endometrial polyps. Although the risk for malignancy seems to be low, more investigation is warranted to truly quantify the lifetime risk. For now, expectant management may be a reasonable approach for incidentally found, asymptomatic polyps.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.08.001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of endometrial polyps among asymptomatic, postmenopausal women is not well defined. There is no clear clinical consensus on how to manage endometrial polyps in this population and whether these polyps truly are a cause for clinical concern.

Objective: This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of endometrial polyps among asymptomatic (without bleeding), postmenopausal women and to evaluate risk factors associated with their presence.

Study design: This cross-sectional study assessed the prevalence of endometrial polyps among asymptomatic, postmenopausal women who underwent a hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse. Patients were excluded if they underwent a hysterectomy for other indications, including postmenopausal bleeding. Following chart review, eligible patients who received care at a single site in Washington state from 2009 to 2018 were included. The primary outcome was the presence of endometrial polyps on pathology. Risk factors associated with polyp prevalence were subsequently assessed using univariate analysis and multivariate regression.

Results: Of the 317 eligible women identified, endometrial polyps were identified in 106 women (33.4%). The average polyp size and endometrial thickness was 13±10 mm and 1.4±1.5 mm, respectively. Most cases (78%) had solitary polyps. Premalignant and malignant lesions were found in 2 cases (1.89%); 1 had endometrial carcinoma and 1 had endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics were similar between patients with and those without endometrial polyps, including the presence of fibroids, endometriosis, and adenomyosis. A multivariate logistic regression showed that the presence of polyps was independently associated with a high body mass index (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.12; P=.02) and use of menopausal hormone therapy (odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.72; P=.04).

Conclusion: Asymptomatic postmenopausal women who underwent hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse exhibited a high prevalence of endometrial polyps. Those who used menopausal hormone therapy and who had a high body mass index were at a higher risk for developing endometrial polyps. Although the risk for malignancy seems to be low, more investigation is warranted to truly quantify the lifetime risk. For now, expectant management may be a reasonable approach for incidentally found, asymptomatic polyps.

子宫阴道脱垂的无症状绝经后妇女中子宫内膜息肉的患病率和风险因素。
背景:绝经后无症状妇女的子宫内膜息肉发病率尚不明确。对于如何处理这类人群中的子宫内膜息肉以及这些息肉是否真的需要引起临床关注,临床上还没有达成明确的共识:研究设计:这项横断面研究评估了因子宫阴道脱垂而接受子宫切除术的无症状绝经后妇女中子宫内膜息肉的患病率。因绝经后出血等其他适应症而接受子宫切除术的患者不包括在内。病历审查包括 2009 年至 2018 年期间在华盛顿州单个地点接受治疗的符合条件的患者。主要结果是病理检查发现子宫内膜息肉。随后使用单变量分析和多变量回归评估了与息肉患病率相关的风险因素:在 317 名符合条件的妇女中,有 106 名妇女(33.4%)被查出患有子宫内膜息肉。息肉的平均大小和内膜厚度分别为 13 +/- 10 毫米和 1.4 +/- 1.5 毫米。大多数病例(78%)为单发息肉。有 2 例(1.89%)发现了癌前病变和恶性病变;其中一例为子宫内膜癌,一例为子宫内膜上皮内瘤变。有子宫内膜息肉和无子宫内膜息肉患者的基线临床和人口统计学特征相似,包括是否存在子宫肌瘤、子宫内膜异位症和子宫腺肌症。多变量逻辑回归显示,息肉的存在与高体重指数(OR 1.06,95%-CI 1.01-1.12,P 值 0.02)和使用绝经激素治疗(OR 1.67,95%-CI 1.02-2.72,P 值 0.04)独立相关:结论:因子宫阴道脱垂而接受子宫切除术的绝经后无症状妇女的子宫内膜息肉发病率较高。使用绝经激素治疗和体重指数高的妇女患子宫内膜息肉的风险更高。虽然恶性风险似乎很低,但要真正量化终生风险,还需要进行更多的调查。目前,对于偶然发现的无症状息肉,预期治疗可能是一种合理的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2237
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare. Focus Areas: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders. Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases. Content Types: Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles. Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology. Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field. Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews. Peer Review Process: All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信