EXPRESS: Within-Category Satiation and Cross-Category Spillover in Multi-Product Advertising

IF 11.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Shijie Lu, Sha Yang, Yao (Alex) Yao
{"title":"EXPRESS: Within-Category Satiation and Cross-Category Spillover in Multi-Product Advertising","authors":"Shijie Lu, Sha Yang, Yao (Alex) Yao","doi":"10.1177/00222429241274727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-product ads (MPAs) allow an ad platform to display multiple products within a single ad unit. Unlike a single-product display ad, similar ads from the same product category may appear in MPAs and induce consumer satiation. Further, the simultaneous display of ads from multiple product categories can result in cross-category complementarity or substitution in consumers’ utility from ad-clicking. This study examines ad platforms’ potential benefit from incorporating consumer within-category satiation and cross-category spillover into ad-serving policies. To achieve this goal, the authors propose a full-equilibrium modeling framework to capture both the demand (i.e., consumers’ clicks) and supply sides (i.e., advertisers’ bids) of MPAs. The results from a dataset from a large display ad network reveal heterogeneity in within-category satiation across consumers and categories, and provide evidence of cross-category complementarity. The authors then demonstrate how the platform can indirectly influence the ad variety and category composition of MPAs through three counterfactuals of ad-serving policy changes. The results show that the implementation of a more privacy-preserving policy may hurt both consumer welfare and the platform’s revenue because of the reduced ad variety, which makes consumers more prone to within-category satiation and less prone to cross-category complementarity.","PeriodicalId":16152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429241274727","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multi-product ads (MPAs) allow an ad platform to display multiple products within a single ad unit. Unlike a single-product display ad, similar ads from the same product category may appear in MPAs and induce consumer satiation. Further, the simultaneous display of ads from multiple product categories can result in cross-category complementarity or substitution in consumers’ utility from ad-clicking. This study examines ad platforms’ potential benefit from incorporating consumer within-category satiation and cross-category spillover into ad-serving policies. To achieve this goal, the authors propose a full-equilibrium modeling framework to capture both the demand (i.e., consumers’ clicks) and supply sides (i.e., advertisers’ bids) of MPAs. The results from a dataset from a large display ad network reveal heterogeneity in within-category satiation across consumers and categories, and provide evidence of cross-category complementarity. The authors then demonstrate how the platform can indirectly influence the ad variety and category composition of MPAs through three counterfactuals of ad-serving policy changes. The results show that the implementation of a more privacy-preserving policy may hurt both consumer welfare and the platform’s revenue because of the reduced ad variety, which makes consumers more prone to within-category satiation and less prone to cross-category complementarity.
快讯:多产品广告中的品类内饱和与跨品类溢出
多产品广告(MPA)允许广告平台在一个广告单元内展示多种产品。与单一产品展示广告不同,同一产品类别的类似广告可能会出现在 MPA 中,从而引起消费者的饱和。此外,同时展示多个产品类别的广告会使消费者在点击广告时产生跨类别互补或替代效用。本研究探讨了广告平台将消费者的品类内饱和度和跨品类溢出效应纳入广告服务政策的潜在好处。为实现这一目标,作者提出了一个全均衡建模框架,以捕捉 MPA 的需求方(即消费者的点击)和供应方(即广告商的出价)。来自一个大型展示广告网络数据集的研究结果揭示了不同消费者和类别之间类别内饱和度的异质性,并提供了跨类别互补性的证据。然后,作者通过三种广告服务政策变化的反事实,展示了平台如何间接影响 MPA 的广告种类和类别构成。结果表明,由于广告种类的减少,消费者更容易产生类别内饱和,而不容易产生跨类别互补,因此实施更加保护隐私的政策可能会损害消费者福利和平台收入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
5.40%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Founded in 1936,the Journal of Marketing (JM) serves as a premier outlet for substantive research in marketing. JM is dedicated to developing and disseminating knowledge about real-world marketing questions, catering to scholars, educators, managers, policy makers, consumers, and other global societal stakeholders. Over the years,JM has played a crucial role in shaping the content and boundaries of the marketing discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信