Clinical and Micro-CT Analyses of Vertical Guided Bone Regeneration of the Mandible Using a d-PTFE Membrane, Autogenous Bone, and High-Temperature Processed Xenograft: A Case Series Study.

Ran Herzberg, Gil Slutzkey, Perry Raz, Fatma Rayyan, Ilan Beitlitum
{"title":"Clinical and Micro-CT Analyses of Vertical Guided Bone Regeneration of the Mandible Using a d-PTFE Membrane, Autogenous Bone, and High-Temperature Processed Xenograft: A Case Series Study.","authors":"Ran Herzberg, Gil Slutzkey, Perry Raz, Fatma Rayyan, Ilan Beitlitum","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of vertical guided bone regeneration (GBR) in the mandible using a nonresorbable membrane and a bone graft combination of autogenous bone chips and high-temperature processed (HTP) xenograft via CT scans and micro-CT analysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients underwent vertical ridge augmentation procedures prior to implant placement. The surgical procedure included flap elevation and placement of a bone graft comprising a 1:1 combination of autogenous posterior mandible-derived bone chips and HTP xenograft graft particles covered with a dense polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membrane trimmed to suit the 3D shape of the bone defect. This was fastened securely with titanium (Ti) screws and pins as well as a layer of native collagen membrane. Postoperative complications and ridge measurements were assessed. Before bone augmentation and implant placement, the bone parameters were obtained from CT scans. Biopsy samples were. harvested during implantation and were examined via micro-CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 13 study procedures were successful without any complications. The results revealed average vertical and horizontal bone gains of 3.35 mm and 5.15 mm, respectively. A total of 33 implants were successfully placed in the augmented areas, without the need for further bone augmentation. Micro-CT analysis revealed 48% bone, 15% filler material, and 37% noncalcified tissue in the augmented region compared to 65% bone, 3% filler material, and 32% noncalcified tissue in the pristine bone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A mixture of autogenous bone and HTP xenograft, covered with a d-PTFE membrane and a layer of native collagen membrane, was effective for vertical GBR.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":" ","pages":"299-306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of vertical guided bone regeneration (GBR) in the mandible using a nonresorbable membrane and a bone graft combination of autogenous bone chips and high-temperature processed (HTP) xenograft via CT scans and micro-CT analysis.

Materials and methods: Patients underwent vertical ridge augmentation procedures prior to implant placement. The surgical procedure included flap elevation and placement of a bone graft comprising a 1:1 combination of autogenous posterior mandible-derived bone chips and HTP xenograft graft particles covered with a dense polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membrane trimmed to suit the 3D shape of the bone defect. This was fastened securely with titanium (Ti) screws and pins as well as a layer of native collagen membrane. Postoperative complications and ridge measurements were assessed. Before bone augmentation and implant placement, the bone parameters were obtained from CT scans. Biopsy samples were. harvested during implantation and were examined via micro-CT.

Results: All 13 study procedures were successful without any complications. The results revealed average vertical and horizontal bone gains of 3.35 mm and 5.15 mm, respectively. A total of 33 implants were successfully placed in the augmented areas, without the need for further bone augmentation. Micro-CT analysis revealed 48% bone, 15% filler material, and 37% noncalcified tissue in the augmented region compared to 65% bone, 3% filler material, and 32% noncalcified tissue in the pristine bone.

Conclusions: A mixture of autogenous bone and HTP xenograft, covered with a d-PTFE membrane and a layer of native collagen membrane, was effective for vertical GBR.

使用 d-PTFE 膜、自体骨和高温处理异种移植物进行下颌骨垂直引导骨再生的临床和显微 CT 分析--一项病例系列研究。
目的:通过 CT 扫描和显微 CT 分析,评估利用不可吸收膜和自体骨片与高温处理(HTP)异种移植物组合进行下颌骨垂直引导骨再生(GBR)的疗效。材料和方法:患者在植入种植体前接受垂直脊增量手术。手术过程包括皮瓣抬高和放置骨移植,骨移植由自体下颌骨后方骨片和 HTP 异种移植颗粒按 1:1 的比例组合而成,其上覆盖着根据骨缺损的三维形状修剪的 d-PTFE 膜。然后用钛螺钉和销钉以及一层天然胶原膜将其牢牢固定。对术后并发症和牙脊测量进行了评估。通过 CT 扫描获得骨增量前和植入前的骨参数。在植入过程中收集的活检标本通过显微 CT 进行了检查。结果:所有 13 项研究手术都很成功,没有出现任何并发症。结果显示,垂直和水平方向的平均骨增量分别为 3.35 毫米和 5.15 毫米。共有 33 个种植体成功植入了增量区域,无需进一步的骨增量。显微 CT 分析显示,在增量区域,骨质占 48%,填充材料占 15%,非钙化组织占 37%;而在原始骨质中,骨质占 65%,填充材料占 3%,非钙化组织占 32%。结论自体骨和 HTP 异种移植的混合物,再覆盖一层 d-PTFE 膜和一层原生胶原膜,对垂直 GBR 很有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信