Which Gait Tasks Produce Reliable Outcome Measures of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease?

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Demi Zoetewei, Pieter Ginis, Maaike Goris, Moran Gilat, Talia Herman, Marina Brozgol, Pablo Cornejo Thumm, Jeffrey M Hausdorff, Alice Nieuwboer, Nicholas D'Cruz
{"title":"Which Gait Tasks Produce Reliable Outcome Measures of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease?","authors":"Demi Zoetewei, Pieter Ginis, Maaike Goris, Moran Gilat, Talia Herman, Marina Brozgol, Pablo Cornejo Thumm, Jeffrey M Hausdorff, Alice Nieuwboer, Nicholas D'Cruz","doi":"10.3233/JPD-240134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measurement of freezing of gait (FOG) relies on the sensitivity and reliability of tasks to provoke FOG. It is currently unclear which tasks provide the best outcomes and how medication state plays into this.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish the sensitivity and test-retest reliability of various FOG-provoking tasks for presence and severity of FOG, with (ON) and without (OFF) dopaminergic medication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FOG-presence and percentage time frozen (% TF) were derived from video annotations of a home-based FOG-provoking protocol performed in OFF and ON. This included: the four meter walk (4MW), Timed Up and Go (TUG) single (ST) and dual task (DT), 360° turns in ST and DT, a doorway condition, and a personalized condition. Sensitivity was tested at baseline in 63 definite freezers. Test-retest reliability was evaluated over 5 weeks in 26 freezers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sensitivity and test-retest reliability were highest for 360° turns and higher in OFF than ON. Test-retest intra-class correlation coefficients of % TF varied between 0.63-0.90 in OFF and 0.18-0.87 in ON, and minimal detectable changes (MDCs) were high. The optimal protocol included TUG ST, 360° turns ST, 360° turns DT and a doorway condition, provoking FOG in all freezers in OFF and 91.9% in ON and this could be done reliably in 95.8% (OFF) and 84.0% (ON) of the sample. Combining OFF and ON further improved outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The highest sensitivity and reliability was achieved with a multi-trigger protocol performed in OFF + ON. However, the high MDCs for % TF underscore the need for further optimization of FOG measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parkinson's disease","volume":" ","pages":"1163-1174"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parkinson's disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-240134","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Measurement of freezing of gait (FOG) relies on the sensitivity and reliability of tasks to provoke FOG. It is currently unclear which tasks provide the best outcomes and how medication state plays into this.

Objective: To establish the sensitivity and test-retest reliability of various FOG-provoking tasks for presence and severity of FOG, with (ON) and without (OFF) dopaminergic medication.

Methods: FOG-presence and percentage time frozen (% TF) were derived from video annotations of a home-based FOG-provoking protocol performed in OFF and ON. This included: the four meter walk (4MW), Timed Up and Go (TUG) single (ST) and dual task (DT), 360° turns in ST and DT, a doorway condition, and a personalized condition. Sensitivity was tested at baseline in 63 definite freezers. Test-retest reliability was evaluated over 5 weeks in 26 freezers.

Results: Sensitivity and test-retest reliability were highest for 360° turns and higher in OFF than ON. Test-retest intra-class correlation coefficients of % TF varied between 0.63-0.90 in OFF and 0.18-0.87 in ON, and minimal detectable changes (MDCs) were high. The optimal protocol included TUG ST, 360° turns ST, 360° turns DT and a doorway condition, provoking FOG in all freezers in OFF and 91.9% in ON and this could be done reliably in 95.8% (OFF) and 84.0% (ON) of the sample. Combining OFF and ON further improved outcomes.

Conclusions: The highest sensitivity and reliability was achieved with a multi-trigger protocol performed in OFF + ON. However, the high MDCs for % TF underscore the need for further optimization of FOG measurement.

哪些步态任务能对帕金森病患者的步态冻结进行可靠的结果测量?
背景:步态冻结(FOG)的测量依赖于刺激步态冻结任务的敏感性和可靠性。目前尚不清楚哪些任务能提供最佳结果,也不清楚药物状态在其中的作用:目的:确定在服用(开启)和未服用(关闭)多巴胺能药物的情况下,各种诱发 FOG 的任务对 FOG 存在和严重程度的敏感性和重复测试可靠性:方法:根据在 "关机 "和 "开机 "状态下进行的家庭FOG诱发方案的视频注释,得出FOG存在情况和冻结时间百分比(% TF)。其中包括:四米步行 (4MW)、定时起立行走 (TUG) 单项任务 (ST) 和双项任务 (DT)、ST 和 DT 中的 360° 转体、门道条件和个性化条件。灵敏度是在 63 名明确的冷冻者中进行基线测试的。对 26 名冷冻人进行了为期 5 周的重复测试可靠性评估:结果:360° 旋转的灵敏度和重复测试可靠性最高,关机状态下的灵敏度和重复测试可靠性高于开机状态。在关机状态下,TF%的测试-重测类内相关系数为0.63-0.90,在开机状态下为0.18-0.87,最小可检测变化(MDC)较高。最佳方案包括 TUG ST、360° 转体 ST、360° 转体 DT 和门道条件,在关机和开机状态下分别有 91.9% 和 95.8% (关机)和 84.0% (开机)的样本能可靠地进行 FOG 激发。将 "关闭 "和 "开启 "相结合可进一步提高结果:在 "关机 "和 "开机 "状态下执行多重触发方案可获得最高的灵敏度和可靠性。然而,TF% 的高 MDCs 强调了进一步优化 FOG 测量的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
5.80%
发文量
338
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Parkinson''s Disease (JPD) publishes original research in basic science, translational research and clinical medicine in Parkinson’s disease in cooperation with the Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease. It features a first class Editorial Board and provides rigorous peer review and rapid online publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信