The effect of a combined cooling intervention on cognitive function in the heat during an intermittent running protocol

Stacey Cowe, Simon Cooper, Rachel Malcolm, Louis Hall, David Donkin, Caroline Sunderland
{"title":"The effect of a combined cooling intervention on cognitive function in the heat during an intermittent running protocol","authors":"Stacey Cowe,&nbsp;Simon Cooper,&nbsp;Rachel Malcolm,&nbsp;Louis Hall,&nbsp;David Donkin,&nbsp;Caroline Sunderland","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite optimal cognitive function being essential for performance, there is a lack of research on the effectiveness of combined cooling interventions on team sport athlete's cognitive function when exercising in the heat. In a randomised, crossover design, 12 unacclimatised men (age: 22.3 ± 3.0 years, body mass: 73.4 ± 5.1 kg, height: 181.0 ± 5.3 cm and <span></span><math></math> max: 51.2 ± 9.5 mL/kg/min) participated in a control (CON) and combined cooling trial (ice slurry and ice collar; COOL). A battery of cognitive tests were completed prior to, during (at half-time) and following a 90-min intermittent running protocol in the heat (33°C, 50% relative humidity (RH)). Perceptual and physiological measures were taken throughout the protocol. In CON, response times were quicker on the Stroop task complex level (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and the visual search test complex level at full-time (<i>p</i> = 0.014) compared to COOL. During COOL, response times were quicker at half-time on the Stroop task complex level (<i>p</i> = 0.024) compared to CON. Lower rectal temperatures were seen during COOL (CON: 37.44 ± 0.65°C and COOL: 37.28 ± 0.68°C) as well as lower skin, neck and forehead temperatures (main effect of trial, all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Lower ratings of thermal sensation and perceived exertion and enhanced thermal comfort were recorded during COOL (main effect of trial, all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Whilst minimal differences in cognitive function were found when using the combined cooling intervention, the findings highlight a practical and effective strategy to improving many physiological and perceptual responses to intermittent exercise in the heat.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12178","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite optimal cognitive function being essential for performance, there is a lack of research on the effectiveness of combined cooling interventions on team sport athlete's cognitive function when exercising in the heat. In a randomised, crossover design, 12 unacclimatised men (age: 22.3 ± 3.0 years, body mass: 73.4 ± 5.1 kg, height: 181.0 ± 5.3 cm and max: 51.2 ± 9.5 mL/kg/min) participated in a control (CON) and combined cooling trial (ice slurry and ice collar; COOL). A battery of cognitive tests were completed prior to, during (at half-time) and following a 90-min intermittent running protocol in the heat (33°C, 50% relative humidity (RH)). Perceptual and physiological measures were taken throughout the protocol. In CON, response times were quicker on the Stroop task complex level (p = 0.002) and the visual search test complex level at full-time (p = 0.014) compared to COOL. During COOL, response times were quicker at half-time on the Stroop task complex level (p = 0.024) compared to CON. Lower rectal temperatures were seen during COOL (CON: 37.44 ± 0.65°C and COOL: 37.28 ± 0.68°C) as well as lower skin, neck and forehead temperatures (main effect of trial, all p < 0.05). Lower ratings of thermal sensation and perceived exertion and enhanced thermal comfort were recorded during COOL (main effect of trial, all p < 0.05). Whilst minimal differences in cognitive function were found when using the combined cooling intervention, the findings highlight a practical and effective strategy to improving many physiological and perceptual responses to intermittent exercise in the heat.

Abstract Image

在间歇性跑步方案中,联合降温干预对高温下认知功能的影响。
尽管最佳的认知功能对运动成绩至关重要,但目前还缺乏有关联合降温干预措施对团队运动运动员在高温下运动时认知功能的有效性的研究。在一项随机交叉设计中,12 名不适应高温的男性(年龄:22.3 ± 3.0 岁,体重:73.4 ± 5.1 千克,身高:181.0 ± 5.3 厘米,最大 V ˙ O 2 $\dot{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{O}}_{2}$ :51.2±9.5毫升/千克/分钟)参加了对照组(CON)和联合冷却试验(冰浆和冰圈;COOL)。在高温(33°C,50% 相对湿度(RH))条件下进行 90 分钟间歇性跑步之前、期间(半程)和之后,完成了一系列认知测试。在整个测试过程中都进行了感知和生理测量。与 COOL 相比,在 CON 中,全时的 Stroop 任务复合水平(p = 0.002)和视觉搜索测试复合水平(p = 0.014)的反应时间更快。在 COOL 期间,与 CON 相比,半时的 Stroop 任务综合水平反应时间更快(p = 0.024)。在 COOL 期间,直肠温度较低(CON:37.44 ± 0.65°C 和 COOL:37.28 ± 0.68°C),皮肤、颈部和前额温度也较低(试验的主效应,均 p = 0.014)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信