Parent-Reported Ease of Listening in Preschool-Aged Children With Bilateral and Unilateral Hearing Loss.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Ear and Hearing Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1097/AUD.0000000000001553
Vijayalakshmi Easwar, Sanna Hou, Vicky W Zhang
{"title":"Parent-Reported Ease of Listening in Preschool-Aged Children With Bilateral and Unilateral Hearing Loss.","authors":"Vijayalakshmi Easwar, Sanna Hou, Vicky W Zhang","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evidence from school-aged children suggests that the ease with which children listen varies with the presence of hearing loss and the acoustic environment despite the use of devices like hearing aids. However, little is known about the ease of listening in preschool-aged children with hearing loss-an age at which rapid learning occurs and increased listening difficulty or effort may diminish the required capacity to learn new skills. To this end, the objectives of the present study were to (i) assess parent-reported aided ease of listening as a function of hearing loss configuration (hearing loss in one versus both ears) and device configuration among children with hearing loss in one ear (unilateral hearing loss), and (ii) investigate factors that influence children's ease of listening.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Parents of 83 children with normal hearing, 54 aided children with bilateral hearing loss (hearing loss in both ears), and 139 children with unilateral hearing loss participated in the study. Of the 139 children with unilateral loss, 72 were unaided, 54 were aided with a device on the ear with hearing loss (direct aiding) and 13 were aided with a device that routed signals to the contralateral normal hearing ear (indirect aiding). Mean age of children was 40.2 months (1 SD = 2.5; range: 36 to 51). Parents completed the two subscales of the Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children+ (PEACH+) questionnaire, namely functional listening and ease of listening. Individual percent scores were computed for quiet and noisy situations. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess the effect of hearing loss configuration and device configuration in children with unilateral hearing loss. Multiple regression was used to assess factors that influenced ease of listening. Factors included hearing thresholds, age at first device fit, consistency in device use, condition (quiet/noise), presence of developmental disabilities, and functional listening abilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children with direct aiding for their hearing loss, either unilateral or bilateral, had similarly lower functional listening skills and ease of listening than their normal hearing peers. Unaided children with unilateral hearing loss had lower functional listening skills and ease of listening than their normal hearing peers in noise but not in quiet. All aided children with unilateral hearing loss, irrespective of direct or indirect aiding had lower functional listening skills and ease of listening relative to normal hearing children in both quiet and noise. Furthermore, relative to unaided children with unilateral hearing loss, those with indirect aiding had lower functional listening and ease of listening. Regression analyses revealed functional listening as a significant predictor of ease of listening in all children with hearing loss. In addition, worse degrees of hearing loss and presence of noise reduced ease of listening in unaided children with unilateral hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bilateral hearing loss is associated with poorer-than-typical ease of listening in preschoolers even when aided. The impact of unilateral hearing loss on ease of listening is similar to that observed in children with bilateral hearing loss, despite good hearing in one ear and aiding. Given increased difficulties experienced by children with unilateral loss, with or without a device, additional strategies to facilitate communication abilities in noise should be a priority.</p>","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001553","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Evidence from school-aged children suggests that the ease with which children listen varies with the presence of hearing loss and the acoustic environment despite the use of devices like hearing aids. However, little is known about the ease of listening in preschool-aged children with hearing loss-an age at which rapid learning occurs and increased listening difficulty or effort may diminish the required capacity to learn new skills. To this end, the objectives of the present study were to (i) assess parent-reported aided ease of listening as a function of hearing loss configuration (hearing loss in one versus both ears) and device configuration among children with hearing loss in one ear (unilateral hearing loss), and (ii) investigate factors that influence children's ease of listening.

Design: Parents of 83 children with normal hearing, 54 aided children with bilateral hearing loss (hearing loss in both ears), and 139 children with unilateral hearing loss participated in the study. Of the 139 children with unilateral loss, 72 were unaided, 54 were aided with a device on the ear with hearing loss (direct aiding) and 13 were aided with a device that routed signals to the contralateral normal hearing ear (indirect aiding). Mean age of children was 40.2 months (1 SD = 2.5; range: 36 to 51). Parents completed the two subscales of the Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children+ (PEACH+) questionnaire, namely functional listening and ease of listening. Individual percent scores were computed for quiet and noisy situations. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess the effect of hearing loss configuration and device configuration in children with unilateral hearing loss. Multiple regression was used to assess factors that influenced ease of listening. Factors included hearing thresholds, age at first device fit, consistency in device use, condition (quiet/noise), presence of developmental disabilities, and functional listening abilities.

Results: Children with direct aiding for their hearing loss, either unilateral or bilateral, had similarly lower functional listening skills and ease of listening than their normal hearing peers. Unaided children with unilateral hearing loss had lower functional listening skills and ease of listening than their normal hearing peers in noise but not in quiet. All aided children with unilateral hearing loss, irrespective of direct or indirect aiding had lower functional listening skills and ease of listening relative to normal hearing children in both quiet and noise. Furthermore, relative to unaided children with unilateral hearing loss, those with indirect aiding had lower functional listening and ease of listening. Regression analyses revealed functional listening as a significant predictor of ease of listening in all children with hearing loss. In addition, worse degrees of hearing loss and presence of noise reduced ease of listening in unaided children with unilateral hearing loss.

Conclusions: Bilateral hearing loss is associated with poorer-than-typical ease of listening in preschoolers even when aided. The impact of unilateral hearing loss on ease of listening is similar to that observed in children with bilateral hearing loss, despite good hearing in one ear and aiding. Given increased difficulties experienced by children with unilateral loss, with or without a device, additional strategies to facilitate communication abilities in noise should be a priority.

双侧和单侧听力损失学龄前儿童的家长听力易感性。
目的:来自学龄儿童的证据表明,尽管使用了助听器等设备,但儿童聆听的难易程度会随着听力损失的存在和声学环境的变化而变化。然而,人们对学龄前听力损失儿童聆听的难易程度却知之甚少--这个年龄段的儿童正处于快速学习阶段,聆听难度或努力程度的增加可能会削弱学习新技能所需的能力。为此,本研究的目的是:(i) 评估单耳听力损失(单耳听力损失与双耳听力损失)儿童中家长报告的辅助听力难易程度与听力损失配置(单耳听力损失与双耳听力损失)和设备配置的关系;(ii) 调查影响儿童听力难易程度的因素:设计:83 名听力正常儿童、54 名双耳听力损失(双耳均有听力损失)的受助儿童和 139 名单侧听力损失儿童的家长参与了研究。在 139 名单侧听力损失的儿童中,72 名儿童未接受辅助,54 名儿童在有听力损失的耳朵上安装了辅助设备(直接辅助),13 名儿童在对侧听力正常的耳朵上安装了辅助设备(间接辅助)。儿童的平均年龄为 40.2 个月(1 SD = 2.5;范围:36 至 51)。家长填写了 "家长对儿童听力/口腔表现的评估+"(PEACH+)问卷的两个分量表,即功能性听力和易听度。计算了安静和嘈杂环境下的个人百分得分。线性混合效应模型用于评估单侧听力损失儿童的听力损失配置和设备配置的影响。多元回归法用于评估影响易听度的因素。这些因素包括听阈、首次配戴设备的年龄、设备使用的一致性、条件(安静/噪音)、是否存在发育障碍以及功能性聆听能力:结果:与听力正常的同龄人相比,直接佩戴助听器的听力损失儿童(无论是单侧还是双侧)的功能性聆听技能和聆听难易程度同样较低。未接受辅助治疗的单侧听力损失儿童在噪音环境下的功能性聆听能力和聆听难易程度均低于听力正常的同龄儿童,但在安静环境下则没有差异。所有单侧听力损失的受助儿童,不论是直接受助还是间接受助,在安静和噪音环境中的功能性聆听技能和聆听难易程度都低于正常听力儿童。此外,与未接受助听的单侧听力损失儿童相比,接受间接助听的儿童的功能性聆听能力和聆听难易程度都较低。回归分析表明,功能性听力是所有听力损失儿童听力易受影响程度的重要预测因素。此外,听力损失程度较重和存在噪音也会降低单侧听力损失儿童的易听度:结论:双侧听力损失会导致学龄前儿童的听力易受影响程度低于正常水平,即使在有辅助设备的情况下也是如此。单侧听力损失对听力容易程度的影响与双侧听力损失儿童的情况相似,尽管单耳听力良好且有助听器。鉴于单侧听力损失儿童在使用或不使用助听器时会遇到更多困难,因此应优先考虑采取更多策略来提高他们在噪音中的交流能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ear and Hearing
Ear and Hearing 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From the basic science of hearing and balance disorders to auditory electrophysiology to amplification and the psychological factors of hearing loss, Ear and Hearing covers all aspects of auditory and vestibular disorders. This multidisciplinary journal consolidates the various factors that contribute to identification, remediation, and audiologic and vestibular rehabilitation. It is the one journal that serves the diverse interest of all members of this professional community -- otologists, audiologists, educators, and to those involved in the design, manufacture, and distribution of amplification systems. The original articles published in the journal focus on assessment, diagnosis, and management of auditory and vestibular disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信