Optimal Drop Heights for Determining Reactive Strength Performance in Youth-Is 1 Drop Height Sufficient to Generate Trustworthy Conclusions for Training Practice?

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Exercise Science Pub Date : 2024-08-07 Print Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1123/pes.2024-0006
Michael Keiner, Sebastian Möck, Hagen Hartmann, Klaus Wirth
{"title":"Optimal Drop Heights for Determining Reactive Strength Performance in Youth-Is 1 Drop Height Sufficient to Generate Trustworthy Conclusions for Training Practice?","authors":"Michael Keiner, Sebastian Möck, Hagen Hartmann, Klaus Wirth","doi":"10.1123/pes.2024-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study critically examines the suitability of using a single drop height to assess the reaction strength index in trained and active participants, a key component of athletic performance. Using a cross-sectional design, 377 trained (n = 163) and active (n = 214) participants aged 14-18 years performing drop jumps from 4 different heights (24, 32, 40, and 48 cm) were studied. The primary aim was to explore the individual differences in reaction strength index at these heights and to assess whether a single height can reliably represent stretch-shortening cycle capabilities. While the repeated measures analysis of variance did not reveal any significant differences, the Bland-Altmann analysis revealed significant individual discrepancies between the performance of the drop heights, resulting in a mean absolute error of 32.1 and a mean absolute percentage error of 20.6%. These results strongly suggest that a single drop height is not sufficient to determine performance in the stretch-shortening cycle. This has important practical implications as it can lead to underestimates of performance trends. The study advocates the inclusion of a range of drop heights in routine testing to accurately measure reactive power and thus improve the effectiveness of individualized training programs for young athletes/active youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":49712,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Exercise Science","volume":" ","pages":"233-239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Exercise Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2024-0006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study critically examines the suitability of using a single drop height to assess the reaction strength index in trained and active participants, a key component of athletic performance. Using a cross-sectional design, 377 trained (n = 163) and active (n = 214) participants aged 14-18 years performing drop jumps from 4 different heights (24, 32, 40, and 48 cm) were studied. The primary aim was to explore the individual differences in reaction strength index at these heights and to assess whether a single height can reliably represent stretch-shortening cycle capabilities. While the repeated measures analysis of variance did not reveal any significant differences, the Bland-Altmann analysis revealed significant individual discrepancies between the performance of the drop heights, resulting in a mean absolute error of 32.1 and a mean absolute percentage error of 20.6%. These results strongly suggest that a single drop height is not sufficient to determine performance in the stretch-shortening cycle. This has important practical implications as it can lead to underestimates of performance trends. The study advocates the inclusion of a range of drop heights in routine testing to accurately measure reactive power and thus improve the effectiveness of individualized training programs for young athletes/active youth.

确定青少年反应力量表现的最佳落点高度--1 个落点高度是否足以为训练实践提供可信的结论?
本研究对使用单一落点高度来评估训练有素和活跃的参与者的反应强度指数(运动成绩的关键组成部分)是否合适进行了批判性研究。研究采用横断面设计,对 377 名训练有素(n = 163)和活跃(n = 214)的 14-18 岁参与者从 4 个不同高度(24、32、40 和 48 厘米)进行落体跳跃进行了研究。主要目的是探索在这些高度上反应强度指数的个体差异,并评估单一高度是否能可靠地代表拉伸缩短周期能力。虽然重复测量方差分析未显示出任何显著差异,但布兰德-阿尔特曼分析显示,不同落体高度的个体差异很大,导致平均绝对误差为 32.1,平均绝对百分比误差为 20.6%。这些结果有力地表明,单一的下落高度不足以确定拉伸缩短周期的性能。这具有重要的实际意义,因为它可能导致对性能趋势的低估。这项研究提倡在常规测试中加入一定范围的下落高度,以准确测量反作用力,从而提高针对年轻运动员/好动青少年的个性化训练计划的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Exercise Science
Pediatric Exercise Science 医学-生理学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Exercise Science is a journal committed to enriching the scientific knowledge of exercise during childhood and adolescence. To this end it publishes information that contributes to an understanding of (a) the unique aspects of the physiologic, physical, biochemical, and psychologic responses of children to exercise, (b) the role of exercise in the treatment of pediatric chronic diseases, (c) the importance of physical activity in the prevention of illness and preservation of wellness, and (d) the means by which participation in sports may be made safer and more enjoyable for children and youth. Consideration will be given for publication of work by various methodologies consistent with the scientific approach. Besides original research, the journal includes review articles, abstracts from other journals, book reviews, and editorial comments. Pediatric Exercise Science encourages the expression of conflicting opinions regarding children and exercise by providing a forum for alternative viewpoints. At the same time it serves as a means of accumulating a base of research information that will allow application of experimental data to clinical practice. The scientific disciplines contributing to this body of knowledge are diverse. Therefore it is the purpose of this journal to provide a common focus for disseminating advances in the science of exercise during childhood. In doing so, the journal allows the opportunity for cross-fertilization of ideas between disciplines that will potentiate the growth of knowledge in this field. Pediatric Exercise Science seeks to stimulate new ideas regarding exercise in children and to increase the awareness of scientists, health care providers, and physical educators of the importance of exercise during childhood.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书