Implementing a rapid cord compression Magnetic Resonance Imaging protocol in the emergency department: Lessons learned.

IF 1.3 Q4 NEUROIMAGING
Shruti Mishra, Ashok Srinivasan, Lauren Kelsey, Katherine Bojicic, Maria Masotti, Qiaochu Chen, Ellen Hoeffner, Steven Kronick, Diana Gomez-Hassan
{"title":"Implementing a rapid cord compression Magnetic Resonance Imaging protocol in the emergency department: Lessons learned.","authors":"Shruti Mishra, Ashok Srinivasan, Lauren Kelsey, Katherine Bojicic, Maria Masotti, Qiaochu Chen, Ellen Hoeffner, Steven Kronick, Diana Gomez-Hassan","doi":"10.1177/19714009241269540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & purpose: </strong>(1) Evaluate efficacy of an abbreviated total spine protocol in triaging emergency department (ED) patients through retrospective evaluation. (2) Describe patient outcomes following implementation of a rapid cord compression protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>(1) All contrast-enhanced total spine magnetic resonance imaging studies (MRIs) performed on ED patients (<i>n</i> = 75) between 10/1-12/31/2022 for evaluation of cord compression were included. Two readers with 6 and 5 years of experience blindly reviewed the abbreviated protocol (comprised of sagittal T2w and axial T2w sequences) assessing presence of cord compression or severe spinal canal stenosis. Ground truth was consensus by a neuroradiology fellow and 2 attendings. (2) The implemented rapid protocol included sagittal T1w, sagittal T2w Dixon and axial T2w images. All ED patients (<i>n</i> = 85) who were imaged using the rapid protocol from 5/1-8/31/2023 were included. Patient outcomes and call-back rates were determined through chart review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) Sensitivity and specificity for severe spinal canal stenosis and/or cord compression was 1.0 and 0.92, respectively, for reader 1 and 0.78 and 0.85, respectively, for reader 2. Negative predictive value was 1.0 and 0.97 for readers 1 and 2, respectively. (2) The implemented rapid cord compression protocol resulted in 60% reduction in imaging time at 1.5T. The call-back rate for additional sequences was 7%. In patients who underwent surgery, no additional MRI images were acquired in 82% of cases (9/11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing an abbreviated non-contrast total spine protocol in the ED results in a low call-back rate with acquired MRI images proving sufficient for both triage and treatment planning in most patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19714009241269540"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009241269540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & purpose: (1) Evaluate efficacy of an abbreviated total spine protocol in triaging emergency department (ED) patients through retrospective evaluation. (2) Describe patient outcomes following implementation of a rapid cord compression protocol.

Methods: (1) All contrast-enhanced total spine magnetic resonance imaging studies (MRIs) performed on ED patients (n = 75) between 10/1-12/31/2022 for evaluation of cord compression were included. Two readers with 6 and 5 years of experience blindly reviewed the abbreviated protocol (comprised of sagittal T2w and axial T2w sequences) assessing presence of cord compression or severe spinal canal stenosis. Ground truth was consensus by a neuroradiology fellow and 2 attendings. (2) The implemented rapid protocol included sagittal T1w, sagittal T2w Dixon and axial T2w images. All ED patients (n = 85) who were imaged using the rapid protocol from 5/1-8/31/2023 were included. Patient outcomes and call-back rates were determined through chart review.

Results: (1) Sensitivity and specificity for severe spinal canal stenosis and/or cord compression was 1.0 and 0.92, respectively, for reader 1 and 0.78 and 0.85, respectively, for reader 2. Negative predictive value was 1.0 and 0.97 for readers 1 and 2, respectively. (2) The implemented rapid cord compression protocol resulted in 60% reduction in imaging time at 1.5T. The call-back rate for additional sequences was 7%. In patients who underwent surgery, no additional MRI images were acquired in 82% of cases (9/11).

Conclusions: Implementing an abbreviated non-contrast total spine protocol in the ED results in a low call-back rate with acquired MRI images proving sufficient for both triage and treatment planning in most patients.

在急诊科实施快速脊髓压迫磁共振成像方案:经验教训。
背景和目的:(1)通过回顾性评估,评价简略全脊柱方案在急诊科(ED)患者分流中的疗效。(方法:(1)纳入 2022 年 10 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间为评估脊髓压迫而对急诊科患者(n = 75)进行的所有对比增强全脊柱磁共振成像(MRI)检查。两名分别有 6 年和 5 年经验的读片员对简略方案(包括矢状面 T2w 和轴向 T2w 序列)进行盲审,评估是否存在脊髓压迫或严重的椎管狭窄。一名神经放射学研究员和两名主治医师就基本事实达成共识。(2)实施的快速方案包括矢状位 T1w、矢状位 T2w Dixon 和轴位 T2w 图像。所有在 2023 年 5 月 1 日至 8 月 31 日期间使用快速方案成像的急诊室患者(n = 85)均被纳入其中。结果:(1) 对严重椎管狭窄和/或脊髓压迫的敏感性和特异性,阅读器 1 分别为 1.0 和 0.92,阅读器 2 分别为 0.78 和 0.85。读者 1 和读者 2 的阴性预测值分别为 1.0 和 0.97。(2)实施快速脐带压缩方案后,1.5T 的成像时间缩短了 60%。额外序列的回调率为 7%。在接受手术的患者中,82%的病例(9/11)无需获取额外的磁共振成像:结论:在急诊室实施简短的非对比全脊柱方案可降低回访率,所获得的 MRI 图像足以满足大多数患者的分诊和治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroradiology Journal
Neuroradiology Journal NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信