Dissemination and implementation science frameworks and strategies to increase breast cancer screening for at-risk women in the United States: A scoping review.

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Public Health Research Pub Date : 2024-08-05 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1177/22799036241268841
Meera Rao, Sebastian Densley, Adeife Marciniak, Sara Burgoa, Yasmine Zerrouki, Goodness Okwaraji, Diana Lobaina, Vama Jhumkhawala, Michelle Knecht, Panagiota Kitsantas, Lea Sacca
{"title":"Dissemination and implementation science frameworks and strategies to increase breast cancer screening for at-risk women in the United States: A scoping review.","authors":"Meera Rao, Sebastian Densley, Adeife Marciniak, Sara Burgoa, Yasmine Zerrouki, Goodness Okwaraji, Diana Lobaina, Vama Jhumkhawala, Michelle Knecht, Panagiota Kitsantas, Lea Sacca","doi":"10.1177/22799036241268841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dissemination and implementation science (D&I) can help bridge the gap between research and practice by addressing how to facilitate and maintain pre-existing evidence-based interventions (EBIs) in various contexts within different fields, including that of breast cancer screening and treatment. Yet, despite the availability of D&I frameworks and strategies, there is a lack of studies exploring knowledge transfer dissemination and implementation models, strategies, and frameworks in the setting of breast cancer care. There is a need for studies that create guidelines and roadmaps built on theoretical foundations of D&I research to scale up successful D&I of strategies, frameworks, and protocols proven to cater to the needs of all breast cancer patients when seeking screening and treatment services. The Arksey and O'Malley (2005) York methodology was used as guidance for this review: (1) identifying research questions; (2) searching for relevant studies; (3) selecting studies relevant to the research questions; (4) charting the data; (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting results. Most cited barriers (<i>n</i> = 46) sorted into the category of \"Recruitment, Measurement, and Delivery Challenges.\" The predominant ERIC strategy, featured in a noteworthy 84% of studies, was \"Tailor strategies\" (#16), which belongs to the \"Adapt and tailor to context: culture, language, data analysis, collection\" domain. This study can guide researchers, physicians, and community workers in improving accessibility, affordability, and quality of breast cancer screening and adequate follow-up opportunities through D&I strategies and models improving the reach and sustainability of evidence-based programs in at-risk female populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":45958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11304495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036241268841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dissemination and implementation science (D&I) can help bridge the gap between research and practice by addressing how to facilitate and maintain pre-existing evidence-based interventions (EBIs) in various contexts within different fields, including that of breast cancer screening and treatment. Yet, despite the availability of D&I frameworks and strategies, there is a lack of studies exploring knowledge transfer dissemination and implementation models, strategies, and frameworks in the setting of breast cancer care. There is a need for studies that create guidelines and roadmaps built on theoretical foundations of D&I research to scale up successful D&I of strategies, frameworks, and protocols proven to cater to the needs of all breast cancer patients when seeking screening and treatment services. The Arksey and O'Malley (2005) York methodology was used as guidance for this review: (1) identifying research questions; (2) searching for relevant studies; (3) selecting studies relevant to the research questions; (4) charting the data; (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting results. Most cited barriers (n = 46) sorted into the category of "Recruitment, Measurement, and Delivery Challenges." The predominant ERIC strategy, featured in a noteworthy 84% of studies, was "Tailor strategies" (#16), which belongs to the "Adapt and tailor to context: culture, language, data analysis, collection" domain. This study can guide researchers, physicians, and community workers in improving accessibility, affordability, and quality of breast cancer screening and adequate follow-up opportunities through D&I strategies and models improving the reach and sustainability of evidence-based programs in at-risk female populations.

传播与实施科学框架和战略,以增加美国高危妇女的乳腺癌筛查:范围审查。
传播与实施科学(D&I)可以帮助缩小研究与实践之间的差距,解决如何在不同领域(包括乳腺癌筛查和治疗领域)的各种情况下促进和维持已有的循证干预措施(EBIs)。然而,尽管有 D&I 框架和策略,却缺乏在乳腺癌护理环境中探索知识转移传播和实施模式、策略和框架的研究。有必要开展研究,在设计与创新研究的理论基础上制定指导方针和路线图,以推广成功的设计与创新战略、框架和方案,这些战略、框架和方案已被证明能够满足所有乳腺癌患者在寻求筛查和治疗服务时的需求。本综述以 Arksey 和 O'Malley(2005 年)的约克方法论为指导:(1)确定研究问题;(2)搜索相关研究;(3)选择与研究问题相关的研究;(4)绘制数据图表;(5)整理、总结和报告结果。引用最多的障碍(n = 46)归类为 "招募、测量和交付挑战"。值得注意的是,有 84% 的研究采用了 ERIC 的主要策略,即 "量身定制策略"(第 16 项),该策略属于 "根据具体情况进行调整和定制:文化、语言、数据分析和收集 "领域。这项研究可以指导研究人员、医生和社区工作者通过 D&I 策略和模式提高乳腺癌筛查的可及性、可负担性和质量,并提供充分的随访机会,从而改善循证项目在高危女性群体中的覆盖面和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Research
Journal of Public Health Research PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Research (JPHR) is an online Open Access, peer-reviewed journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the “traditional'' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, JPHR strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, JPHR publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信