Acute analgesic effect of nicotine vaping using three experimental pain induction tasks: a randomized, placebo-controlled laboratory study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Michael P Bremmer, Michael B Paladino, Alana M Campbell, Kai Xia, Robert Tarran, Christian S Hendershot, Susan S Girdler
{"title":"Acute analgesic effect of nicotine vaping using three experimental pain induction tasks: a randomized, placebo-controlled laboratory study.","authors":"Michael P Bremmer, Michael B Paladino, Alana M Campbell, Kai Xia, Robert Tarran, Christian S Hendershot, Susan S Girdler","doi":"10.1007/s00213-024-06669-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Pain and nicotine use are co-occurring conditions with a significant impact on health. Experimental evidence supports an acute analgesic effect of nicotine which may reinforce nicotine use among those with chronic pain. Evidence for nicotine analgesia have primarily been gathered in combustible cigarette users and have not been extended to electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS or vaping). Furthermore, the mechanisms of nicotine analgesia in humans are not well understood.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assess the effect of acute vaped nicotine on subjective and behavioral indices of pain sensitivity using three tasks designed to probe distinct mechanisms of analgesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study recruited ENDS users (N = 86) to undergo a paced vaping protocol followed by pain tasks in counterbalanced order. Across four sessions, participants vaped e-liquid containing nicotine or placebo, and flavor or no-flavor in a 2 × 2 within-subject design. Assessments included cold pressor, submaximal effort tourniquet to induce ischemic pain, and temporal summation of heat pain, an index of central sensitization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to placebo, nicotine increased cold pressor pain tolerance (η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.031), ischemic pain threshold (η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.073) and tolerance (η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.056) but had no effect on temporal summation of pain. Flavor did not affect pain sensitivity. Females reported greater ischemic pain sensitivity (η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.027) and greater reductions in craving (η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.086).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent with research from tobacco smoking, analgesia may be reinforcing and contribute to nicotine dependence among ENDS users. More research on sex differences is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":20783,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-024-06669-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Pain and nicotine use are co-occurring conditions with a significant impact on health. Experimental evidence supports an acute analgesic effect of nicotine which may reinforce nicotine use among those with chronic pain. Evidence for nicotine analgesia have primarily been gathered in combustible cigarette users and have not been extended to electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS or vaping). Furthermore, the mechanisms of nicotine analgesia in humans are not well understood.

Objectives: Assess the effect of acute vaped nicotine on subjective and behavioral indices of pain sensitivity using three tasks designed to probe distinct mechanisms of analgesia.

Methods: This study recruited ENDS users (N = 86) to undergo a paced vaping protocol followed by pain tasks in counterbalanced order. Across four sessions, participants vaped e-liquid containing nicotine or placebo, and flavor or no-flavor in a 2 × 2 within-subject design. Assessments included cold pressor, submaximal effort tourniquet to induce ischemic pain, and temporal summation of heat pain, an index of central sensitization.

Results: Compared to placebo, nicotine increased cold pressor pain tolerance (ηp2 = 0.031), ischemic pain threshold (ηp2 = 0.073) and tolerance (ηp2 = 0.056) but had no effect on temporal summation of pain. Flavor did not affect pain sensitivity. Females reported greater ischemic pain sensitivity (ηp2 = 0.027) and greater reductions in craving (ηp2 = 0.086).

Conclusions: Consistent with research from tobacco smoking, analgesia may be reinforcing and contribute to nicotine dependence among ENDS users. More research on sex differences is warranted.

Abstract Image

使用三种实验性疼痛诱导任务进行尼古丁吸入的急性镇痛效果:一项随机、安慰剂对照实验室研究。
理由疼痛和尼古丁的使用是对健康有重大影响的并发症。实验证据支持尼古丁具有急性镇痛作用,这可能会加强慢性疼痛患者对尼古丁的使用。尼古丁镇痛的证据主要收集于可燃香烟使用者,尚未扩展到电子尼古丁给药系统(ENDS 或 vaping)。此外,尼古丁在人体中的镇痛机制也不甚明了:评估急性吸入尼古丁对疼痛敏感性的主观和行为指数的影响,设计三个任务来探究不同的镇痛机制:本研究招募了ENDS使用者(N = 86),让他们按照平衡的顺序接受有节奏的吸食方案,然后进行疼痛任务。在四个环节中,参与者以 2 × 2 受试者内设计的方式吸食含有尼古丁或安慰剂、香精或无香精的电子液体。评估内容包括冷压、亚极限用力止血带诱发缺血性疼痛以及热痛的时间累加(一种中枢敏化指数):结果:与安慰剂相比,尼古丁提高了冷压痛耐受性(ηp2 = 0.031)、缺血性痛阈值(ηp2 = 0.073)和耐受性(ηp2 = 0.056),但对疼痛的时间累加没有影响。味道对疼痛敏感性没有影响。女性对缺血性疼痛的敏感度更高(ηp2 = 0.027),对渴求的降低幅度更大(ηp2 = 0.086):结论:与吸烟研究一致,镇痛可能会强化ENDS使用者对尼古丁的依赖。需要对性别差异进行更多研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychopharmacology
Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
257
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Behavioural Pharmacology Society (EBPS) Psychopharmacology is an international journal that covers the broad topic of elucidating mechanisms by which drugs affect behavior. The scope of the journal encompasses the following fields: Human Psychopharmacology: Experimental This section includes manuscripts describing the effects of drugs on mood, behavior, cognition and physiology in humans. The journal encourages submissions that involve brain imaging, genetics, neuroendocrinology, and developmental topics. Usually manuscripts in this section describe studies conducted under controlled conditions, but occasionally descriptive or observational studies are also considered. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Translational This section comprises studies addressing the broad intersection of drugs and psychiatric illness. This includes not only clinical trials and studies of drug usage and metabolism, drug surveillance, and pharmacoepidemiology, but also work utilizing the entire range of clinically relevant methodologies, including neuroimaging, pharmacogenetics, cognitive science, biomarkers, and others. Work directed toward the translation of preclinical to clinical knowledge is especially encouraged. The key feature of submissions to this section is that they involve a focus on clinical aspects. Preclinical psychopharmacology: Behavioral and Neural This section considers reports on the effects of compounds with defined chemical structures on any aspect of behavior, in particular when correlated with neurochemical effects, in species other than humans. Manuscripts containing neuroscientific techniques in combination with behavior are welcome. We encourage reports of studies that provide insight into the mechanisms of drug action, at the behavioral and molecular levels. Preclinical Psychopharmacology: Translational This section considers manuscripts that enhance the confidence in a central mechanism that could be of therapeutic value for psychiatric or neurological patients, using disease-relevant preclinical models and tests, or that report on preclinical manipulations and challenges that have the potential to be translated to the clinic. Studies aiming at the refinement of preclinical models based upon clinical findings (back-translation) will also be considered. The journal particularly encourages submissions that integrate measures of target tissue exposure, activity on the molecular target and/or modulation of the targeted biochemical pathways. Preclinical Psychopharmacology: Molecular, Genetic and Epigenetic This section focuses on the molecular and cellular actions of neuropharmacological agents / drugs, and the identification / validation of drug targets affecting the CNS in health and disease. We particularly encourage studies that provide insight into the mechanisms of drug action at the molecular level. Manuscripts containing evidence for genetic or epigenetic effects on neurochemistry or behavior are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信