Perspectives on Online Resources for People Experiencing Pain: A Qualitative Study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Marian Wilson, Janet R Katz, Mafe D Chase, Ross J Bindler, Teresa L Rangel, Rebecca A Penders, Pamela S Kohlmeier, Jamie Lewis
{"title":"Perspectives on Online Resources for People Experiencing Pain: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Marian Wilson, Janet R Katz, Mafe D Chase, Ross J Bindler, Teresa L Rangel, Rebecca A Penders, Pamela S Kohlmeier, Jamie Lewis","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Innovations in technology offer potential solutions to address pain care inequities. To maximize impacts, greater understanding is needed regarding preferences and priorities of people experiencing or treating pain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study conducted focus groups to investigate the perspectives of people with pain and healthcare workers regarding online resources for pain management. Researchers asked about barriers to current pain management and what resources would be most desired in an online format to meet needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were a randomly selected sub-sample of adults from a northwestern region of the United States who participated in an online, survey-based study. Eligible participants identified as either a person who had received treatment for pain or a healthcare worker who cared for people with pain. Of the 199 survey respondents, 30 participated in one of three focus group sessions. Focus groups were conducted using videoconferencing technology, then recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Focus group participants included 22 adults who identified as a person treated for pain of any type and 8 healthcare workers. Themes relating to eHealth use reflected desires for (1) freely accessible and vetted pain management information in one place, (2) reliable information tailored to need and pain type, and (3) easy-to-use resources. Findings revealed that some effective pain management resources do exist, yet obstacles including inflexible and inequitable healthcare practices and lack of knowledge about options may limit access to these resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Including preferences of user groups can assist in creating resources that are likely to be useful for those with pain and their caregivers. Innovations are needed to address persisting gaps in care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.07.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Innovations in technology offer potential solutions to address pain care inequities. To maximize impacts, greater understanding is needed regarding preferences and priorities of people experiencing or treating pain.

Objectives: This study conducted focus groups to investigate the perspectives of people with pain and healthcare workers regarding online resources for pain management. Researchers asked about barriers to current pain management and what resources would be most desired in an online format to meet needs.

Methods: Participants were a randomly selected sub-sample of adults from a northwestern region of the United States who participated in an online, survey-based study. Eligible participants identified as either a person who had received treatment for pain or a healthcare worker who cared for people with pain. Of the 199 survey respondents, 30 participated in one of three focus group sessions. Focus groups were conducted using videoconferencing technology, then recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Focus group participants included 22 adults who identified as a person treated for pain of any type and 8 healthcare workers. Themes relating to eHealth use reflected desires for (1) freely accessible and vetted pain management information in one place, (2) reliable information tailored to need and pain type, and (3) easy-to-use resources. Findings revealed that some effective pain management resources do exist, yet obstacles including inflexible and inequitable healthcare practices and lack of knowledge about options may limit access to these resources.

Conclusion: Including preferences of user groups can assist in creating resources that are likely to be useful for those with pain and their caregivers. Innovations are needed to address persisting gaps in care.

疼痛体验者对在线资源的看法:一项定性研究。
背景:技术创新为解决疼痛护理不公平问题提供了潜在的解决方案。为了最大限度地扩大影响,需要进一步了解疼痛患者或疼痛治疗者的偏好和优先事项:本研究通过焦点小组调查了疼痛患者和医护人员对疼痛管理在线资源的看法。研究人员询问了当前疼痛管理的障碍,以及最希望以在线形式提供哪些资源以满足需求:研究人员从美国西北部地区的成年人中随机抽取了一些样本,参加了一项在线调查研究。符合条件的参与者要么是接受过疼痛治疗的人,要么是护理疼痛患者的医护人员。在 199 名调查对象中,有 30 人参加了三个焦点小组中的一个。焦点小组使用视频会议技术进行,然后进行录音、转录,并使用主题分析法进行分析:焦点小组参与者包括 22 名自称接受过任何类型疼痛治疗的成年人和 8 名医护人员。与电子保健使用相关的主题反映了以下愿望:(1) 在一个地方自由获取经过审核的疼痛管理信息;(2) 根据需要和疼痛类型提供可靠的信息;(3) 提供易于使用的资源。研究结果表明,确实存在一些有效的疼痛管理资源,但包括不灵活、不公平的医疗保健实践以及对各种选择缺乏了解在内的各种障碍可能会限制这些资源的使用:结论:纳入用户群体的偏好有助于创建可能对疼痛患者及其护理人员有用的资源。需要创新来解决护理方面长期存在的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信