Assessment of Meat Content and Foreign Object Detection in Cattle Meatballs Using Ultrasonography, Radiography, and Electrical Impedance Tomography Imaging.

IF 2.7 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
International Journal of Food Science Pub Date : 2024-08-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/9526283
Mokhamad Fakhrul Ulum, Maryani, Min Rahminiwati, Lina Choridah, Nurhuda Hendra Setyawan, Khusnul Ain, Utriweni Mukhaiyar, Fitra Aji Pamungkas, Jakaria, Agah Drajat Garnadi
{"title":"Assessment of Meat Content and Foreign Object Detection in Cattle Meatballs Using Ultrasonography, Radiography, and Electrical Impedance Tomography Imaging.","authors":"Mokhamad Fakhrul Ulum, Maryani, Min Rahminiwati, Lina Choridah, Nurhuda Hendra Setyawan, Khusnul Ain, Utriweni Mukhaiyar, Fitra Aji Pamungkas, Jakaria, Agah Drajat Garnadi","doi":"10.1155/2024/9526283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Meat content and physically hazardous contaminants in the internal section of meatballs cannot be detected by the naked eye or surface detectors. This study is aimed at analyzing the meat content of cattle meatballs and detecting foreign objects using ultrasonography (USG), digital radiography (DR), and electrical impedance tomography (EIT). Meatballs were produced using four different meat formulations (0%, 25%, 50%, and 75% meat) and three treatments (no preservative (control), borax, and formalin preservatives). Cast iron and plastic beads were used as models of foreign objects embedded in the samples. The echogenicity, opacity, and resistivity values of each sample were evaluated and compared across groups. The results showed that the shelf life of the control meatballs was shorter than that of meatballs with preservatives. The echogenicity and opacity values for the different meat formulations were hypoechoic in USG and grey in DR. USG was able to distinguish between control and preservative-treated meatballs but could not differentiate meat content and detect foreign objects. Conversely, DR effectively assessed meat content and detected iron-based foreign objects, while EIT showed higher resistivity values for iron and plastic beads compared to the meatball bodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14125,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Food Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9526283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Meat content and physically hazardous contaminants in the internal section of meatballs cannot be detected by the naked eye or surface detectors. This study is aimed at analyzing the meat content of cattle meatballs and detecting foreign objects using ultrasonography (USG), digital radiography (DR), and electrical impedance tomography (EIT). Meatballs were produced using four different meat formulations (0%, 25%, 50%, and 75% meat) and three treatments (no preservative (control), borax, and formalin preservatives). Cast iron and plastic beads were used as models of foreign objects embedded in the samples. The echogenicity, opacity, and resistivity values of each sample were evaluated and compared across groups. The results showed that the shelf life of the control meatballs was shorter than that of meatballs with preservatives. The echogenicity and opacity values for the different meat formulations were hypoechoic in USG and grey in DR. USG was able to distinguish between control and preservative-treated meatballs but could not differentiate meat content and detect foreign objects. Conversely, DR effectively assessed meat content and detected iron-based foreign objects, while EIT showed higher resistivity values for iron and plastic beads compared to the meatball bodies.

利用超声波成像、射线成像和电阻抗断层扫描成像评估牛肉丸中的肉含量和异物检测。
肉丸内部的肉含量和对身体有害的污染物无法通过肉眼或表面探测器检测出来。本研究旨在使用超声波成像(USG)、数字射线成像(DR)和电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)分析牛肉丸的肉含量并检测异物。使用四种不同的肉类配方(0%、25%、50% 和 75%)和三种处理方法(无防腐剂(对照组)、硼砂和福尔马林防腐剂)生产肉丸。铸铁和塑料珠被用作嵌入样品的异物模型。对各组样品的回声、不透明度和电阻率值进行了评估和比较。结果表明,对照组肉丸的保质期比添加了防腐剂的肉丸短。不同肉类配方的回声和不透明度值在 USG 中为低回声,在 DR 中为灰色。USG 能够区分对照组和防腐剂处理过的肉丸,但不能区分肉的含量和检测异物。相反,DR 能有效评估肉的含量并检测到铁基异物,而 EIT 则显示铁和塑料珠的电阻率值高于肉丸体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Food Science
International Journal of Food Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
105
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Food Science is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes research and review articles in all areas of food science. As a multidisciplinary journal, articles discussing all aspects of food science will be considered, including, but not limited to: enhancing shelf life, food deterioration, food engineering, food handling, food processing, food quality, food safety, microbiology, and nutritional research. The journal aims to provide a valuable resource for food scientists, food producers, food retailers, nutritionists, the public health sector, and relevant governmental and non-governmental agencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信