Knowledge of HPV vaccination and associated HNC and treatment decision-making among minority populations

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
{"title":"Knowledge of HPV vaccination and associated HNC and treatment decision-making among minority populations","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Understand vaccination knowledge and barriers to vaccination among minority adults.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Cross-sectional survey.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Otolaryngology clinics at a safety net hospital and a tertiary academic center and a head and neck cancer screening event.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Survey was administered to consenting patients. Descriptive statistics and significance testing were used to characterize the data, with non-minority respondents as controls. Multivariate logistic regression was used to understand factors associated with vaccination.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>HPV vaccination among our 241 respondents (n = 41, 17.67 %) and their qualifying children (n = 52, 33.55 %) was low. Non-vaccinated minorities were significantly more likely to express interest in HPV vaccination (28.66 % vs 8.66 %, p = 0.016). Minority patients were significantly less knowledgeable about HPV causing cervical (88.64 % vs 72.45 %, p = 0.024) and head and neck (68.18 % vs 44.90 %, p = 0.005) cancer and were also less aware of HPV infection (95.45 % vs 81.12 %, p = 0.020) among non-women. Lack of knowledge about the HPV vaccine was the most cited reason why minority patients did not or were uninterested in vaccination for themselves or their children. In a multivariable logistic regression of factors associated with HPV vaccination, only increased age demonstrated a significant association with vaccination likelihood (OR = 0.91, 95 % CI = [0.88–0.95], p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Reported HPV vaccination rates were low for both white and minority patients but did not significantly vary on univariate or multivariate analysis. However, minority respondents were significantly less knowledgeable about HPV and its manifestations; they most often cited inadequate knowledge as why did not receive or were uninterested in HPV vaccination. As such, HPV vaccination educational interventions may raise vaccination rates among minority populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924002448","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Understand vaccination knowledge and barriers to vaccination among minority adults.

Study design

Cross-sectional survey.

Setting

Otolaryngology clinics at a safety net hospital and a tertiary academic center and a head and neck cancer screening event.

Methods

Survey was administered to consenting patients. Descriptive statistics and significance testing were used to characterize the data, with non-minority respondents as controls. Multivariate logistic regression was used to understand factors associated with vaccination.

Results

HPV vaccination among our 241 respondents (n = 41, 17.67 %) and their qualifying children (n = 52, 33.55 %) was low. Non-vaccinated minorities were significantly more likely to express interest in HPV vaccination (28.66 % vs 8.66 %, p = 0.016). Minority patients were significantly less knowledgeable about HPV causing cervical (88.64 % vs 72.45 %, p = 0.024) and head and neck (68.18 % vs 44.90 %, p = 0.005) cancer and were also less aware of HPV infection (95.45 % vs 81.12 %, p = 0.020) among non-women. Lack of knowledge about the HPV vaccine was the most cited reason why minority patients did not or were uninterested in vaccination for themselves or their children. In a multivariable logistic regression of factors associated with HPV vaccination, only increased age demonstrated a significant association with vaccination likelihood (OR = 0.91, 95 % CI = [0.88–0.95], p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Reported HPV vaccination rates were low for both white and minority patients but did not significantly vary on univariate or multivariate analysis. However, minority respondents were significantly less knowledgeable about HPV and its manifestations; they most often cited inadequate knowledge as why did not receive or were uninterested in HPV vaccination. As such, HPV vaccination educational interventions may raise vaccination rates among minority populations.

少数民族人群对 HPV 疫苗接种及相关 HNC 和治疗决策的了解。
目的: 了解少数民族成年人的疫苗接种知识和障碍:研究设计:横断面调查:横断面调查:地点: 一家安全网医院和一家三级学术中心的耳鼻喉科诊所,以及一次头颈部癌症筛查活动:对同意的患者进行调查。以非少数群体受访者为对照,使用描述性统计和显著性检验来描述数据特征。采用多变量逻辑回归法了解与疫苗接种相关的因素:241 名受访者(n = 41,17.67%)及其符合条件的子女(n = 52,33.55%)中接种 HPV 疫苗的比例较低。未接种疫苗的少数群体对接种 HPV 疫苗表示兴趣的可能性明显更高(28.66% 对 8.66%,P = 0.016)。少数族裔患者对 HPV 导致宫颈癌(88.64 % vs 72.45 %,p = 0.024)和头颈癌(68.18 % vs 44.90 %,p = 0.005)的了解程度明显较低,对 HPV 感染的认识也低于非女性患者(95.45 % vs 81.12 %,p = 0.020)。对 HPV 疫苗缺乏了解是少数族裔患者不为自己或子女接种疫苗或对接种疫苗不感兴趣的最主要原因。在对与接种 HPV 疫苗相关的因素进行的多变量逻辑回归中,只有年龄的增加与接种疫苗的可能性有显著关系(OR = 0.91,95 % CI = [0.88-0.95],p 结论:在接种疫苗的人群中,女性和男性的比例分别为 1%和 1%:白人和少数民族患者报告的 HPV 疫苗接种率都很低,但在单变量或多变量分析中没有明显差异。然而,少数族裔受访者对 HPV 及其表现形式的了解明显较少;他们最常说的不接种或对 HPV 疫苗不感兴趣的原因是知识不足。因此,HPV 疫苗接种教育干预可能会提高少数群体的疫苗接种率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信