Land use selectively impacts soil carbon storage in particulate, water-extractable, and mineral-associated forms across pedogenetic horizons

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
{"title":"Land use selectively impacts soil carbon storage in particulate, water-extractable, and mineral-associated forms across pedogenetic horizons","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Improved understanding of land use derived changes in soil organic matter (OM) compartments stabilized to different degrees against microbial decomposition is required for outlining efficient land use strategies aimed at improving soil ecosystem functions that are strongly coupled to gains and losses of soil organic carbon (OC). However, such data is scarce, particularly in subsoil environments. Consequently, in this study, we analyzed OC storage in topsoils and subsoils, as well as OM fractions with different OC turnover dynamics, including particulate (free and occluded), water-extractable, and mineral-associated OM. We sampled soils under native prairie (10 sites) and long-term arable use (&gt; 40 years, 10 sites) to a depth of 3 m in the central U.S. Our results showed that the arable bulk soils had significantly lower OC content in the A horizon and across all analyzed OM fractions compared to native prairie soils. This reduction was primarily derived from OC losses in the mineral-associated OM (arable: 7.2 ± 0.5 g kg<sup>−1</sup>; native prairie: 12 ± 0.7 g kg<sup>−1</sup>), which retained the most significant portion (50–56 %) of bulk soil OC among all fractions. No significant impact of land use on OC storage in the bulk soil and fractions was observed in the subsoil B and C horizons, except for water-extractable OM, which had lower amounts in arable soils in the C horizon than native prairie soils. This underscores the relevance of this fraction for the translocation of OC across the soil profile in undisturbed systems. Our results highlight the crucial role of mineral-associated OM for soil OC storage, but also its sensitivity to land use change, especially in the topsoil, suggesting this fraction is highly relevant for strategies aiming at restoring pre-disturbance soil OC levels.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706124002210/pdfft?md5=17d47de67d100823cd550be868cab6b2&pid=1-s2.0-S0016706124002210-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706124002210","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improved understanding of land use derived changes in soil organic matter (OM) compartments stabilized to different degrees against microbial decomposition is required for outlining efficient land use strategies aimed at improving soil ecosystem functions that are strongly coupled to gains and losses of soil organic carbon (OC). However, such data is scarce, particularly in subsoil environments. Consequently, in this study, we analyzed OC storage in topsoils and subsoils, as well as OM fractions with different OC turnover dynamics, including particulate (free and occluded), water-extractable, and mineral-associated OM. We sampled soils under native prairie (10 sites) and long-term arable use (> 40 years, 10 sites) to a depth of 3 m in the central U.S. Our results showed that the arable bulk soils had significantly lower OC content in the A horizon and across all analyzed OM fractions compared to native prairie soils. This reduction was primarily derived from OC losses in the mineral-associated OM (arable: 7.2 ± 0.5 g kg−1; native prairie: 12 ± 0.7 g kg−1), which retained the most significant portion (50–56 %) of bulk soil OC among all fractions. No significant impact of land use on OC storage in the bulk soil and fractions was observed in the subsoil B and C horizons, except for water-extractable OM, which had lower amounts in arable soils in the C horizon than native prairie soils. This underscores the relevance of this fraction for the translocation of OC across the soil profile in undisturbed systems. Our results highlight the crucial role of mineral-associated OM for soil OC storage, but also its sensitivity to land use change, especially in the topsoil, suggesting this fraction is highly relevant for strategies aiming at restoring pre-disturbance soil OC levels.

土地利用选择性地影响土壤中颗粒、水提取和矿物质相关形式的碳储存
为了制定高效的土地利用战略,改善与土壤有机碳(OC)的增减密切相关的土壤生态系统功能,我们需要更好地了解因土地利用而导致的土壤有机碳(OM)在不同程度上被微生物分解所稳定的变化。然而,此类数据很少,尤其是在底土环境中。因此,在本研究中,我们分析了表层土壤和底层土壤中的有机碳储量,以及具有不同有机碳周转动态的有机碳组分,包括颗粒有机碳(游离有机碳和闭锁有机碳)、水提取有机碳和矿物相关有机碳。我们对美国中部原生草原土壤(10 个地点)和长期耕地土壤(大于 40 年,10 个地点)深度为 3 米的土壤进行了采样。结果表明,与原生草原土壤相比,耕地大块土壤 A 层和所有分析 OM 部分的 OC 含量明显较低。这种降低主要源于矿物相关 OM 中的 OC 损失(可耕地:7.2 ± 0.5 g kg;原生草原:12 ± 0.7 g kg),在所有组分中,矿物相关 OM 保留了大体积土壤 OC 的最主要部分(50-56 %)。在底土 B 和 C 层中,未观察到土地利用对大块土壤和馏分中 OC 储量的明显影响,但可萃取水 OM 除外,C 层耕地土壤中的可萃取水 OM 含量低于原生草原土壤。这突出表明,在未受干扰的系统中,这部分物质对 OC 在土壤剖面上的转移具有重要意义。我们的研究结果凸显了矿质相关 OM 在土壤 OC 储存中的关键作用,以及它对土地利用变化的敏感性,尤其是在表层土壤中,这表明这部分 OM 与旨在恢复扰动前土壤 OC 水平的战略高度相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信