The Kinematics of 3D Arm Movements in Sub-Acute Stroke: Impaired Inter-Joint Coordination is Attributable to Both Weakness and Flexor Synergy Intrusion.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1177/15459683241268535
Inbar Avni, Ahmet Arac, Reut Binyamin-Netser, Shilo Kramer, John W Krakauer, Lior Shmuelof
{"title":"The Kinematics of 3D Arm Movements in Sub-Acute Stroke: Impaired Inter-Joint Coordination is Attributable to Both Weakness and Flexor Synergy Intrusion.","authors":"Inbar Avni, Ahmet Arac, Reut Binyamin-Netser, Shilo Kramer, John W Krakauer, Lior Shmuelof","doi":"10.1177/15459683241268535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It has long been of interest to characterize the components of the motor abnormality in the arm after stroke. One approach has been to decompose the hemiparesis phenotype into negative signs, such as weakness, and positive signs, such as intrusion of synergies. We sought to identify the contributions of weakness and flexor synergy to motor deficits in sub-acute stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-three sub-acute post-stroke participants and 16 healthy controls performed two functional arm movements; one within flexor synergy (shoulder and elbow flexion), and the other outside flexor synergy (shoulder flexion and elbow extension). We analyzed upper limb 3D kinematics to assess both overall task performance and intrusion of pathological synergies. Weakness and spasticity were also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both tasks produced similar impairments compared to controls. Analysis of elbow and shoulder multi-joint coordination patterns revealed intrusion of synergies in the out-of-synergy reaching task based on the time spent within a flexion-flexion pattern and the correlation between shoulder and elbow angles. Regression analysis indicated that both weakness and synergy intrusion contributed to motor impairment in the out-of-synergy reaching task. Notably, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) was abnormal even when only weakness caused the impairment, cautioning that it is not a pure synergy scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Weakness and synergy intrusion contribute to motor deficits in the sub-acute post-stroke period. An abnormal FMA score cannot be assumed to be due to synergy intrusion. Careful kinematic analysis of naturalistic movements is required to better characterize the contribution of negative and positive signs to upper limb impairment after stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"646-658"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11403926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683241268535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It has long been of interest to characterize the components of the motor abnormality in the arm after stroke. One approach has been to decompose the hemiparesis phenotype into negative signs, such as weakness, and positive signs, such as intrusion of synergies. We sought to identify the contributions of weakness and flexor synergy to motor deficits in sub-acute stroke.

Methods: Thirty-three sub-acute post-stroke participants and 16 healthy controls performed two functional arm movements; one within flexor synergy (shoulder and elbow flexion), and the other outside flexor synergy (shoulder flexion and elbow extension). We analyzed upper limb 3D kinematics to assess both overall task performance and intrusion of pathological synergies. Weakness and spasticity were also measured.

Results: Both tasks produced similar impairments compared to controls. Analysis of elbow and shoulder multi-joint coordination patterns revealed intrusion of synergies in the out-of-synergy reaching task based on the time spent within a flexion-flexion pattern and the correlation between shoulder and elbow angles. Regression analysis indicated that both weakness and synergy intrusion contributed to motor impairment in the out-of-synergy reaching task. Notably, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) was abnormal even when only weakness caused the impairment, cautioning that it is not a pure synergy scale.

Conclusions: Weakness and synergy intrusion contribute to motor deficits in the sub-acute post-stroke period. An abnormal FMA score cannot be assumed to be due to synergy intrusion. Careful kinematic analysis of naturalistic movements is required to better characterize the contribution of negative and positive signs to upper limb impairment after stroke.

亚急性中风患者手臂三维运动的运动学:关节间协调性受损可归因于肢体无力和屈肌协同功能受损。
背景:长期以来,人们一直关注中风后手臂运动异常的特征。一种方法是将偏瘫表型分解为消极体征(如无力)和积极体征(如协同作用的侵入)。我们试图确定在亚急性中风中,无力和屈肌协同作用对运动障碍的贡献:方法:33 名亚急性中风后参与者和 16 名健康对照者进行了两种手臂功能运动:一种是屈肌协同运动(肩关节和肘关节屈曲),另一种是屈肌协同运动之外的运动(肩关节屈曲和肘关节伸展)。我们对上肢三维运动学进行了分析,以评估整体任务表现和病理协同作用的侵入情况。我们还测量了乏力和痉挛情况:结果:与对照组相比,这两项任务都产生了类似的障碍。对肘部和肩部多关节协调模式的分析表明,根据屈伸模式所花费的时间以及肩部和肘部角度之间的相关性,在失去协同作用的伸手任务中存在协同作用的侵入。回归分析表明,在协同作用外伸手任务中,无力和协同作用侵入都是造成运动障碍的原因。值得注意的是,即使只有乏力才会导致运动障碍,Fugl-Meyer 评估(FMA)也会出现异常,这说明它并不是一个纯粹的协同量表:结论:在脑卒中后的亚急性期,乏力和协同作用侵入会导致运动障碍。结论:在中风后的亚急性期,乏力和协同侵入是造成运动障碍的原因,不能认为 FMA 评分异常是由于协同侵入造成的。需要对自然运动进行仔细的运动学分析,以更好地确定负性和阳性体征对卒中后上肢功能障碍的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信