Analyzing quality of life among people with opioid use disorder from the National Institute on Drug Abuse Data Share initiative: implications for decision making.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Thomas Patton, Jan R Boehnke, Ravi Goyal, Andrea Manca, Carla Marienfeld, Natasha K Martin, Bohdan Nosyk, Annick Borquez
{"title":"Analyzing quality of life among people with opioid use disorder from the National Institute on Drug Abuse Data Share initiative: implications for decision making.","authors":"Thomas Patton, Jan R Boehnke, Ravi Goyal, Andrea Manca, Carla Marienfeld, Natasha K Martin, Bohdan Nosyk, Annick Borquez","doi":"10.1007/s11136-024-03729-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to estimate health state utility values (HSUVs) for the key health states found in opioid use disorder (OUD) cost-effectiveness models in the published literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data obtained from six trials representing 1,777 individuals with OUD. We implemented mapping algorithms to harmonize data from different measures of quality of life (the SF-12 Versions 1 and 2 and the EQ-5D-3 L). We performed a regression analysis to quantify the relationship between HSUVs and the following variables: days of extra-medical opioid use in the past 30 days, injecting behaviors, treatment with medications for OUD, HIV status, and age. A secondary analysis explored the impact of opioid withdrawal symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were statistically significant reductions in HSUVs associated with extra-medical opioid use (-0.002 (95% CI [-0.003,-0.0001]) to -0.003 (95% CI [-0.005,-0.002]) per additional day of heroin or other opiate use, respectively), drug injecting compared to not injecting (-0.043 (95% CI [-0.079,-0.006])), HIV-positive diagnosis compared to no diagnosis (-0.074 (95% CI [-0.143,-0.005])), and age (-0.001 per year (95% CI [-0.003,-0.0002])). Parameters associated with medications for OUD treatment were not statistically significant after controlling for extra-medical opioid use (0.0131 (95% CI [-0.0479,0.0769])), in line with prior studies. The secondary analysis revealed that withdrawal symptoms are a fundamental driver of HSUVs, with predictions of 0.817 (95% CI [0.768, 0.858]), 0.705 (95% CI [0.607, 0.786]), and 0.367 (95% CI [0.180, 0.575]) for moderate, severe, and worst level of symptoms, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed HSUVs for OUD that were higher than those from previous studies that had been conducted without input from people living with the condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03729-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to estimate health state utility values (HSUVs) for the key health states found in opioid use disorder (OUD) cost-effectiveness models in the published literature.

Methods: Data obtained from six trials representing 1,777 individuals with OUD. We implemented mapping algorithms to harmonize data from different measures of quality of life (the SF-12 Versions 1 and 2 and the EQ-5D-3 L). We performed a regression analysis to quantify the relationship between HSUVs and the following variables: days of extra-medical opioid use in the past 30 days, injecting behaviors, treatment with medications for OUD, HIV status, and age. A secondary analysis explored the impact of opioid withdrawal symptoms.

Results: There were statistically significant reductions in HSUVs associated with extra-medical opioid use (-0.002 (95% CI [-0.003,-0.0001]) to -0.003 (95% CI [-0.005,-0.002]) per additional day of heroin or other opiate use, respectively), drug injecting compared to not injecting (-0.043 (95% CI [-0.079,-0.006])), HIV-positive diagnosis compared to no diagnosis (-0.074 (95% CI [-0.143,-0.005])), and age (-0.001 per year (95% CI [-0.003,-0.0002])). Parameters associated with medications for OUD treatment were not statistically significant after controlling for extra-medical opioid use (0.0131 (95% CI [-0.0479,0.0769])), in line with prior studies. The secondary analysis revealed that withdrawal symptoms are a fundamental driver of HSUVs, with predictions of 0.817 (95% CI [0.768, 0.858]), 0.705 (95% CI [0.607, 0.786]), and 0.367 (95% CI [0.180, 0.575]) for moderate, severe, and worst level of symptoms, respectively.

Conclusion: We observed HSUVs for OUD that were higher than those from previous studies that had been conducted without input from people living with the condition.

Abstract Image

分析国家药物滥用研究所数据共享计划中阿片类药物使用障碍患者的生活质量:对决策的影响。
目的:我们旨在估算已发表文献中阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)成本效益模型中发现的关键健康状态的健康状态效用值(HSUV):从代表 1,777 名 OUD 患者的六项试验中获取数据。我们采用了映射算法来协调不同生活质量测量数据(SF-12 第 1 版和第 2 版以及 EQ-5D-3 L)。我们进行了回归分析,以量化 HSUV 与以下变量之间的关系:过去 30 天内医外使用阿片类药物的天数、注射行为、接受治疗 OUD 的药物、HIV 感染状况和年龄。一项辅助分析探讨了阿片类药物戒断症状的影响:结果:与医疗外使用阿片类药物相关的 HSUVs 有统计学意义的明显降低(每多使用一天海洛因或其他阿片类药物分别为-0.002(95% CI [-0.003,-0.0001])到-0.003(95% CI [-0.005,-0.002])),注射毒品与不注射相比(-0.002(95% CI [-0.003,-0.0001])到-0.003(95% CI [-0.005,-0.002]))。043(95% CI [-0.079,-0.006]))、HIV 阳性诊断与无诊断相比(-0.074(95% CI [-0.143,-0.005]))和年龄(每年-0.001(95% CI [-0.003,-0.0002]))。与治疗 OUD 的药物相关的参数在控制了医疗外阿片类药物的使用(0.0131 (95% CI [-0.0479,0.0769]))后并无统计学意义,这与之前的研究结果一致。二次分析显示,戒断症状是导致 HSUV 的根本原因,中度、重度和最严重症状的预测值分别为 0.817(95% CI [0.768,0.858])、0.705(95% CI [0.607,0.786])和 0.367(95% CI [0.180,0.575]):我们发现,OUD 的 HSUV 值高于以往在没有患者参与的情况下进行的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信