Predictors of celiac disease in patients with type 1 diabetes and positive tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jessica Rutsky, Andrew Krueger, Qin Sun, Lin Fei, Daniel Mallon
{"title":"Predictors of celiac disease in patients with type 1 diabetes and positive tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A.","authors":"Jessica Rutsky, Andrew Krueger, Qin Sun, Lin Fei, Daniel Mallon","doi":"10.1002/jpn3.12332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Identify clinical and serologic features that more accurately predict a diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), particularly focusing on the degree of elevation of tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A (TTG IgA) and dilution of positive endomysial antibody (EMA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-center retrospective review of patients with T1DM who underwent endoscopy from 2016 to 2022 for evaluation of CD. We compared demographic, anthropometric, and laboratory data as well as symptoms and endoscopy findings for subjects with and without CD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 123 subjects who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 74 (60%) were diagnosed with CD. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed the factors associated with CD were degree of TTG IgA elevation, EMA positivity, and degree of EMA dilution. For every 10-fold increase in TTG IgA, there was a 4.7× increased risk of CD. TTG IgA ≥10 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) provided a positive predictive value (PPV) of 85% (confidence interval [CI]: [0.76-92]) in all subjects and 91% in asymptomatic subjects (CI: [0.75-0.98]). Of 66 subjects with EMA data, 41 (62%) were positive and 32 had CD (PPV = 0.78). Of 12 asymptomatic subjects with positive EMA, eight had CD (PPV = 0.67). For subjects with EMA ≥ 1:80, all were diagnosed with CD, and all had TTG IgA ≥10 times the ULN.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with T1DM, symptoms, adjunct labs, and anthropometrics do not help predict CD, but the degree of elevation of TTG IgA and dilution of a positive EMA result do.</p>","PeriodicalId":16694,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"622-630"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.12332","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Identify clinical and serologic features that more accurately predict a diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), particularly focusing on the degree of elevation of tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A (TTG IgA) and dilution of positive endomysial antibody (EMA).

Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective review of patients with T1DM who underwent endoscopy from 2016 to 2022 for evaluation of CD. We compared demographic, anthropometric, and laboratory data as well as symptoms and endoscopy findings for subjects with and without CD.

Results: Of 123 subjects who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 74 (60%) were diagnosed with CD. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed the factors associated with CD were degree of TTG IgA elevation, EMA positivity, and degree of EMA dilution. For every 10-fold increase in TTG IgA, there was a 4.7× increased risk of CD. TTG IgA ≥10 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) provided a positive predictive value (PPV) of 85% (confidence interval [CI]: [0.76-92]) in all subjects and 91% in asymptomatic subjects (CI: [0.75-0.98]). Of 66 subjects with EMA data, 41 (62%) were positive and 32 had CD (PPV = 0.78). Of 12 asymptomatic subjects with positive EMA, eight had CD (PPV = 0.67). For subjects with EMA ≥ 1:80, all were diagnosed with CD, and all had TTG IgA ≥10 times the ULN.

Conclusions: Among patients with T1DM, symptoms, adjunct labs, and anthropometrics do not help predict CD, but the degree of elevation of TTG IgA and dilution of a positive EMA result do.

1 型糖尿病和组织转谷氨酰胺酶免疫球蛋白 A 阳性患者罹患乳糜泻的预测因素。
目标:确定更准确预测 1 型糖尿病(T1DM)患儿乳糜泻(CD)诊断的临床和血清学特征:确定能更准确预测1型糖尿病(T1DM)患儿乳糜泻(CD)诊断的临床和血清学特征,尤其关注组织转谷氨酰胺酶免疫球蛋白A(TTG IgA)的升高程度和内膜抗体(EMA)阳性的稀释程度:我们对2016年至2022年期间接受内镜检查以评估CD的T1DM患者进行了单中心回顾性研究。我们比较了有 CD 和无 CD 患者的人口统计学、人体测量学、实验室数据以及症状和内镜检查结果:在接受食管胃十二指肠镜检查的 123 名受试者中,74 人(60%)被确诊为 CD 患者。单变量逻辑回归分析显示,与 CD 相关的因素包括 TTG IgA 升高程度、EMA 阳性和 EMA 稀释程度。TTG IgA 每升高 10 倍,患 CD 的风险就增加 4.7 倍。TTG IgA ≥10倍正常值上限(ULN)对所有受试者的阳性预测值(PPV)为85%(置信区间[CI]:[0.76-92]),对无症状受试者的阳性预测值(PPV)为91%(置信区间[CI]:[0.75-0.98])。在 66 名有 EMA 数据的受试者中,41 人(62%)为阳性,32 人患有 CD(PPV = 0.78)。在 12 名 EMA 阳性的无症状受试者中,8 人患有 CD(PPV = 0.67)。在EMA≥1:80的受试者中,所有人都被诊断为CD,所有人的TTG IgA都≥ULN的10倍:结论:在 T1DM 患者中,症状、辅助实验室检查和人体测量指标无助于预测 CD,但 TTG IgA 的升高程度和 EMA 阳性结果的稀释程度有助于预测 CD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.80%
发文量
467
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (JPGN) provides a forum for original papers and reviews dealing with pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, including normal and abnormal functions of the alimentary tract and its associated organs, including the salivary glands, pancreas, gallbladder, and liver. Particular emphasis is on development and its relation to infant and childhood nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信