Metolazone Versus Chlorothiazide in Acute Heart Failure Patients With Diuretic Resistance and Renal Dysfunction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Caitlin M Gibson, Meghan M Beard, Alisa K Escano, Brittany L Good, Teresa G Potter, Albert M Truong, Benjamin Van Tassell
{"title":"Metolazone Versus Chlorothiazide in Acute Heart Failure Patients With Diuretic Resistance and Renal Dysfunction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Caitlin M Gibson, Meghan M Beard, Alisa K Escano, Brittany L Good, Teresa G Potter, Albert M Truong, Benjamin Van Tassell","doi":"10.1097/FJC.0000000000001623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Guidelines recommend intravenous loop diuretics as first-line therapy for patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF) and volume overload. Additional agents can be used for augmentation, but there is limited guidance on agent selection. The study objective was to determine if chlorothiazide or metolazone is associated with differences in diuretic efficacy or safety in loop diuretic-resistant patients with AHF and renal dysfunction (eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m²). We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with AHF and renal dysfunction who received metolazone or chlorothiazide in addition to intravenous loop diuretics. The primary end point was a comparison of 24-hour urine output (UOP) between the 24 hours before and after thiazide administration. Secondary and safety end points included weight change, requirement for vasopressors or inotropes, electrolyte abnormalities, and changes in renal function. A total of 221 patients were included. The mean daily diuretic doses were chlorothiazide 632 mg and metolazone 7 mg. The mean 24-hour UOP increased more among chlorothiazide-treated (from 1668 mL to 3826 mL) versus metolazone-treated patients (from 1672 mL to 2834 mL) ( P < 0.001) after the addition of the second diuretic. Statistically significant reductions in serum creatinine were observed in the chlorothiazide group following 72 hours of treatment ( P = 0.016). More hypomagnesemia was observed in the chlorothiazide group; no differences in other electrolytes or changes in weight were observed. Overall, chlorothiazide was associated with a greater increase in 24-hour UOP than metolazone without an excess of potassium or serum creatinine derangements. However, weight changes did not differ significantly between groups. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm potential differences in diuretic response and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":15212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"451-456"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FJC.0000000000001623","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Guidelines recommend intravenous loop diuretics as first-line therapy for patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF) and volume overload. Additional agents can be used for augmentation, but there is limited guidance on agent selection. The study objective was to determine if chlorothiazide or metolazone is associated with differences in diuretic efficacy or safety in loop diuretic-resistant patients with AHF and renal dysfunction (eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m²). We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with AHF and renal dysfunction who received metolazone or chlorothiazide in addition to intravenous loop diuretics. The primary end point was a comparison of 24-hour urine output (UOP) between the 24 hours before and after thiazide administration. Secondary and safety end points included weight change, requirement for vasopressors or inotropes, electrolyte abnormalities, and changes in renal function. A total of 221 patients were included. The mean daily diuretic doses were chlorothiazide 632 mg and metolazone 7 mg. The mean 24-hour UOP increased more among chlorothiazide-treated (from 1668 mL to 3826 mL) versus metolazone-treated patients (from 1672 mL to 2834 mL) ( P < 0.001) after the addition of the second diuretic. Statistically significant reductions in serum creatinine were observed in the chlorothiazide group following 72 hours of treatment ( P = 0.016). More hypomagnesemia was observed in the chlorothiazide group; no differences in other electrolytes or changes in weight were observed. Overall, chlorothiazide was associated with a greater increase in 24-hour UOP than metolazone without an excess of potassium or serum creatinine derangements. However, weight changes did not differ significantly between groups. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm potential differences in diuretic response and safety.

美托拉宗与氯噻嗪对利尿剂耐药性和肾功能不全的急性心力衰竭患者的对比:一项回顾性队列研究。
指南建议将静脉注射襻利尿剂作为急性心力衰竭(AHF)和容量超负荷住院患者的一线疗法。可使用其他药物进行增效,但在药物选择方面的指导有限。本研究旨在确定氯噻嗪或美托拉宗对襻利尿剂耐药的急性心力衰竭和肾功能不全患者的利尿疗效或安全性是否存在差异。我们对住院的 AHF 和肾功能不全患者进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究,这些患者在接受静脉注射襻利尿剂的同时还接受了美托拉宗或氯噻嗪治疗。主要终点是比较服用噻嗪类药物前后 24 小时的 24 小时尿量 (UOP)。次要和安全性终点包括体重变化、对血管加压药或肌力药的需求、电解质异常和肾功能变化。共纳入了 223 名患者。平均每日利尿剂剂量为氯噻嗪 632 毫克和美托拉宗 7 毫克。氯噻嗪治疗患者(1668 至 3826 毫升)与美托拉宗治疗患者(1672 至 2834 毫升)相比,24 小时平均尿量增加较多(P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
367
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal that publishes original articles and pertinent review articles on basic and clinical aspects of cardiovascular pharmacology. The Journal encourages submission in all aspects of cardiovascular pharmacology/medicine including, but not limited to: stroke, kidney disease, lipid disorders, diabetes, systemic and pulmonary hypertension, cancer angiogenesis, neural and hormonal control of the circulation, sepsis, neurodegenerative diseases with a vascular component, cardiac and vascular remodeling, heart failure, angina, anticoagulants/antiplatelet agents, drugs/agents that affect vascular smooth muscle, and arrhythmias. Appropriate subjects include new drug development and evaluation, physiological and pharmacological bases of drug action, metabolism, drug interactions and side effects, application of drugs to gain novel insights into physiology or pathological conditions, clinical results with new and established agents, and novel methods. The focus is on pharmacology in its broadest applications, incorporating not only traditional approaches, but new approaches to the development of pharmacological agents and the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Please note that JCVP does not publish work based on biological extracts of mixed and uncertain chemical composition or unknown concentration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信