Sex, Race, and Rural-Urban Disparities in Ventricular Tachycardia Ablations.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Amber B Tang, Olumuyiwa P Akinrimisi, Boback Ziaeian
{"title":"Sex, Race, and Rural-Urban Disparities in Ventricular Tachycardia Ablations.","authors":"Amber B Tang, Olumuyiwa P Akinrimisi, Boback Ziaeian","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.05.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ventricular ablation may be clinically indicated for patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) and has been shown to decrease risk of recurrence and overall morbidity. However, the existence of disparities among patients receiving ventricular ablation has not been well characterized.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study, we examined patients hospitalized with VT to determine whether disparities exist among those receiving ablations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the National Inpatient Sample to assess patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of VT in 2019 who did and did not receive catheter ablations. Multiple logistic regression was used to calculate risk factors for VT ablation based on age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and hospital characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting for baseline characteristics and comorbidities, female and Black patients hospitalized with VT had significantly lower odds of receiving ablations compared with male and White patients (OR: 0.835; 95% CI: 0.699-0.997; P = 0.047; and OR: 0.617; 95% CI: 0.457-0.832; P = 0.002, respectively). Additionally, patients at rural or nonteaching hospitals were significantly less likely to receive ablations compared with those at urban, teaching hospitals. No significant differences were noted based on income or insurance status in the adjusted models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified significant disparities in the delivery of ventricular ablations among patients hospitalized with VT. Overall, patients who were female or Black as well as those who were hospitalized at rural or nonteaching hospitals were significantly less likely to receive VT ablations during hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2024.05.033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ventricular ablation may be clinically indicated for patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) and has been shown to decrease risk of recurrence and overall morbidity. However, the existence of disparities among patients receiving ventricular ablation has not been well characterized.

Objectives: In this study, we examined patients hospitalized with VT to determine whether disparities exist among those receiving ablations.

Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample to assess patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of VT in 2019 who did and did not receive catheter ablations. Multiple logistic regression was used to calculate risk factors for VT ablation based on age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and hospital characteristics.

Results: After adjusting for baseline characteristics and comorbidities, female and Black patients hospitalized with VT had significantly lower odds of receiving ablations compared with male and White patients (OR: 0.835; 95% CI: 0.699-0.997; P = 0.047; and OR: 0.617; 95% CI: 0.457-0.832; P = 0.002, respectively). Additionally, patients at rural or nonteaching hospitals were significantly less likely to receive ablations compared with those at urban, teaching hospitals. No significant differences were noted based on income or insurance status in the adjusted models.

Conclusions: We identified significant disparities in the delivery of ventricular ablations among patients hospitalized with VT. Overall, patients who were female or Black as well as those who were hospitalized at rural or nonteaching hospitals were significantly less likely to receive VT ablations during hospitalization.

室性心动过速消融术中的性别、种族和城乡差异。
背景:室性消融术可用于复发性室性心动过速(VT)患者的临床治疗,并已证明可降低复发风险和总体发病率。然而,接受心室消融术的患者之间是否存在差异尚未得到很好的描述:在这项研究中,我们对因 VT 住院的患者进行了调查,以确定接受消融术的患者之间是否存在差异:我们使用全国住院病人样本对 2019 年因主要诊断为 VT 而住院的患者进行了评估,这些患者接受和未接受导管消融术。根据年龄、性别、种族/民族、社会经济状况和医院特征,采用多元逻辑回归计算VT消融的风险因素:调整基线特征和合并症后,与男性和白人患者相比,女性和黑人VT住院患者接受消融术的几率明显较低(OR:0.835;95% CI:0.699-0.997;P = 0.047;OR:0.617;95% CI:0.457-0.832;P = 0.002)。此外,与城市教学医院的患者相比,农村或非教学医院的患者接受消融治疗的可能性明显较低。在调整后的模型中,收入或保险状况无明显差异:我们发现VT住院患者在接受心室消融术方面存在明显差异。总体而言,女性或黑人患者以及在农村或非教学医院住院的患者在住院期间接受 VT 消融术的可能性明显较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology is one of a family of specialist journals launched by the renowned Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It encompasses all aspects of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Submissions of original research and state-of-the-art reviews from cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, neurology, outcomes research, and related fields are encouraged. Experimental and preclinical work that directly relates to diagnostic or therapeutic interventions are also encouraged. In general, case reports will not be considered for publication.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信