Efficacy and safety of fexuprazan in patients with symptoms and signs of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Su Il Kim, Young Chan Lee, Wonjae Cha, Ah Ra Jung, Jeon Yeob Jang, Jeong-Seok Choi, Dong Kun Lee, Hwan Ho Lee, Min Su Kwon, Yoon Se Lee, Young-Gyu Eun
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of fexuprazan in patients with symptoms and signs of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Su Il Kim, Young Chan Lee, Wonjae Cha, Ah Ra Jung, Jeon Yeob Jang, Jeong-Seok Choi, Dong Kun Lee, Hwan Ho Lee, Min Su Kwon, Yoon Se Lee, Young-Gyu Eun","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-08877-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is mainly treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) such as esomeprazole, which have shortcomings like delayed absorption and increased osteoporosis. Fexuprazan is a novel potent potassium-competitive acid blocker that inhibits gastric acid secretion with rapid onset and long duration of action. To assess the efficacy and safety of fexuprazan compared to esomeprazole in patients with LPRD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multicenter, active-controlled trial was conducted in nine otolaryngologic clinics. Patients with reflux symptom index (RSI) ≥ 13 and reflux finding score (RFS) ≥ 7 were randomly assigned to the fexuprazan or esomeprazole groups, and received fexuprazan 40-mg or esomeprazole 40-mg once daily for 8 weeks. The outcomes were (1) mean change, change rate, and valid rate in RSI, RFS, and LPR-related questionnaires; and (2) adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 patients (fexuprazan n = 68, esomeprazole n = 68) were followed up for ≥ 1 month. Each parameter significantly improved after 4 and 8 weeks in each group, with no significant differences between the two groups. For those with severe symptoms (RSI ≥ 18), the fexuprazan group (n = 32) showed more improvement in the mean change and change rate in the RSI than esomeprazole group (n = 31) after 4 weeks (p = .036 and .045, respectively). This phenomenon was especially observed in hoarseness and troublesome cough.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fexuprazan improved symptoms and signs without no serious adverse events in patients with LPRD. In patients with severe symptoms, fexuprazan resulted in a faster symptom improvement than PPI.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>KCT0007251, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=22100 .</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08877-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is mainly treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) such as esomeprazole, which have shortcomings like delayed absorption and increased osteoporosis. Fexuprazan is a novel potent potassium-competitive acid blocker that inhibits gastric acid secretion with rapid onset and long duration of action. To assess the efficacy and safety of fexuprazan compared to esomeprazole in patients with LPRD.

Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multicenter, active-controlled trial was conducted in nine otolaryngologic clinics. Patients with reflux symptom index (RSI) ≥ 13 and reflux finding score (RFS) ≥ 7 were randomly assigned to the fexuprazan or esomeprazole groups, and received fexuprazan 40-mg or esomeprazole 40-mg once daily for 8 weeks. The outcomes were (1) mean change, change rate, and valid rate in RSI, RFS, and LPR-related questionnaires; and (2) adverse events.

Results: A total of 136 patients (fexuprazan n = 68, esomeprazole n = 68) were followed up for ≥ 1 month. Each parameter significantly improved after 4 and 8 weeks in each group, with no significant differences between the two groups. For those with severe symptoms (RSI ≥ 18), the fexuprazan group (n = 32) showed more improvement in the mean change and change rate in the RSI than esomeprazole group (n = 31) after 4 weeks (p = .036 and .045, respectively). This phenomenon was especially observed in hoarseness and troublesome cough.

Conclusion: Fexuprazan improved symptoms and signs without no serious adverse events in patients with LPRD. In patients with severe symptoms, fexuprazan resulted in a faster symptom improvement than PPI.

Trial registration: KCT0007251, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=22100 .

Abstract Image

对有喉咽反流病症状和体征的患者使用非舒必赞的疗效和安全性:随机临床试验。
目的:喉咽反流病(LPRD)主要采用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗,如埃索美拉唑,但这种药物存在吸收延迟和增加骨质疏松等缺点。Fexuprazan 是一种新型的强效钾竞争性胃酸阻断剂,可抑制胃酸分泌,起效快,作用时间长。目的:评估非克普拉赞与埃索美拉唑相比对 LPRD 患者的疗效和安全性:这项前瞻性、随机、双盲、多中心、主动对照试验在九家耳鼻喉科诊所进行。反流症状指数(RSI)≥13且反流发现评分(RFS)≥7的患者被随机分配到非克普拉赞组或埃索美拉唑组,接受非克普拉赞40毫克或埃索美拉唑40毫克治疗,每日一次,共8周。研究结果为:(1)RSI、RFS和LPR相关问卷的平均变化、变化率和有效率;(2)不良事件:共对 136 名患者(非舒浦赞 n = 68,埃索美拉唑 n = 68)进行了≥1 个月的随访。每组的各项参数在 4 周和 8 周后均有明显改善,两组之间无明显差异。对于症状严重者(RSI ≥ 18),4 周后,非索普拉赞组(n = 32)比埃索美拉唑组(n = 31)在 RSI 平均变化率和变化率方面的改善幅度更大(p = .036 和 .045,分别为 0.036 和 0.045)。这一现象尤其体现在声音嘶哑和咳嗽困难方面:结论:非昔布赞可改善 LPRD 患者的症状和体征,且无严重不良反应。在症状严重的患者中,非克普拉赞比 PPI 更快地改善了症状:KCT0007251, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=22100 .
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信