Heparin pretreatment in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Gonçalo Costa, Bernardo Resende, Bárbara Oliveiros, Lino Gonçalves, Rogério Teixeira
{"title":"Heparin pretreatment in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Gonçalo Costa, Bernardo Resende, Bárbara Oliveiros, Lino Gonçalves, Rogério Teixeira","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is frequently administered before percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Current guidelines, however, do not provide clear recommendations for UFH pretreatment before arrival at the coronary catheterization laboratory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between June and July 2023, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies comparing UFH pretreatments in patients with STEMI. A random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies were included, of which four were randomized clinical trials. A total of 76 446 patients were included: 31 238 in the pretreatment group and 39 208 in the control group. Our meta-analysis revealed lower all-cause mortality for the pretreatment strategy when compared with the control group, albeit with high heterogeneity [pooled odds ratio (OR) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49-0.76, P < 0.01; I2 = 77%]; lower in-hospital cardiogenic shock (pooled OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.58-0.78, P < 0.21; I2 = 27%) and a higher rate of spontaneous reperfusion events (pooled OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.47-1.91, P < 0.01; I2 = 79%). In terms of major bleeding, the UFH pretreatment strategy further revealed a decreased rate of events (pooled OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73-0.99, P = 0.40; I2 = 4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests that UFH pretreatment in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with reduced all-cause mortality, cardiogenic shock, enhancing reperfusion rates while diminishing major bleeding events.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001413","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is frequently administered before percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Current guidelines, however, do not provide clear recommendations for UFH pretreatment before arrival at the coronary catheterization laboratory.

Methods: Between June and July 2023, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies comparing UFH pretreatments in patients with STEMI. A random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression analyses were performed.

Results: Fourteen studies were included, of which four were randomized clinical trials. A total of 76 446 patients were included: 31 238 in the pretreatment group and 39 208 in the control group. Our meta-analysis revealed lower all-cause mortality for the pretreatment strategy when compared with the control group, albeit with high heterogeneity [pooled odds ratio (OR) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49-0.76, P < 0.01; I2 = 77%]; lower in-hospital cardiogenic shock (pooled OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.58-0.78, P < 0.21; I2 = 27%) and a higher rate of spontaneous reperfusion events (pooled OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.47-1.91, P < 0.01; I2 = 79%). In terms of major bleeding, the UFH pretreatment strategy further revealed a decreased rate of events (pooled OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73-0.99, P = 0.40; I2 = 4%).

Conclusion: Our study suggests that UFH pretreatment in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with reduced all-cause mortality, cardiogenic shock, enhancing reperfusion rates while diminishing major bleeding events.

ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的肝素预处理:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前通常会使用非小分肝素(UFH)。然而,目前的指南并未对到达冠状动脉导管室前的 UFH 预处理提出明确建议:2023 年 6 月至 7 月期间,我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库中系统检索了 STEMI 患者 UFH 预处理比较研究。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析:共纳入 14 项研究,其中 4 项为随机临床试验。共纳入 76 446 名患者:预处理组 31 238 例,对照组 39 208 例。我们的荟萃分析表明,与对照组相比,预处理策略的全因死亡率较低,但异质性较高[汇总比值比(OR)= 0.61,95% 置信区间(CI):0.49-0.76,P 结论:我们的研究表明,对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 STEMI 患者进行 UFH 预处理可降低全因死亡率、心源性休克、提高再灌注率,同时减少大出血事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Coronary artery disease
Coronary artery disease 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management. Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and​ peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信