Evaluation of the effect of dextrose prolotherapy versus deep dry needling therapy for the treatment of temporomandibular joint anterior disc displacement with reduction: (a randomized controlled trial).

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Amr Gibaly, Mohamed Abdelmoiz, Ahmed Nagi Alghandour
{"title":"Evaluation of the effect of dextrose prolotherapy versus deep dry needling therapy for the treatment of temporomandibular joint anterior disc displacement with reduction: (a randomized controlled trial).","authors":"Amr Gibaly, Mohamed Abdelmoiz, Ahmed Nagi Alghandour","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-05830-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to compare the combined effect of Prolotherapy and Deep Dry Needling (DDN) versus DDN effect on relieving the symptoms of Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) anterior disc displacement.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The clinical trial randomly allocated forty patients. The (control group) patients received four intraarticular and masseteric DDN sessions, while the (study group) patients were subjected to the exact technique followed by Prolosolution injection. The baseline preoperative measurements included Maximal interincisal opening (MIO), auscultation of the presence of clicking, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), which were repeated for postoperative measurements after one, two, five, and eight months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By the end of the study, all patients expressed apparent improvement in pain MIO and clicking. The inter- and intragroup comparison revealed that the pain score values of the control group after five and eight months were significantly higher than those of the study group. The study group demonstrated more significant MIO calibration than the control group, with insignificant differences between both groups regarding the presence of clicking at any time interval. The associations between clicking and VAS values, between clicking and MIO, and between VAS values and increased MIO were positive in the test group and negative in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dextrose Prolotherapy and DDN were beneficial. However, Prolotherapy demonstrated more significant, sustained, and correlated long-term alleviation of symptoms and increased MIO.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The study assesses the sole effect of dextrose prolotherapy on relieving the signs of TMJ anterior disc displacement apart from the impact of the penetrating needle.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The study was registered on www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov (#: NCT05821985) by Ahmed Nagi Alghandour.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05830-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to compare the combined effect of Prolotherapy and Deep Dry Needling (DDN) versus DDN effect on relieving the symptoms of Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) anterior disc displacement.

Patients and methods: The clinical trial randomly allocated forty patients. The (control group) patients received four intraarticular and masseteric DDN sessions, while the (study group) patients were subjected to the exact technique followed by Prolosolution injection. The baseline preoperative measurements included Maximal interincisal opening (MIO), auscultation of the presence of clicking, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), which were repeated for postoperative measurements after one, two, five, and eight months.

Results: By the end of the study, all patients expressed apparent improvement in pain MIO and clicking. The inter- and intragroup comparison revealed that the pain score values of the control group after five and eight months were significantly higher than those of the study group. The study group demonstrated more significant MIO calibration than the control group, with insignificant differences between both groups regarding the presence of clicking at any time interval. The associations between clicking and VAS values, between clicking and MIO, and between VAS values and increased MIO were positive in the test group and negative in the control group.

Conclusions: Dextrose Prolotherapy and DDN were beneficial. However, Prolotherapy demonstrated more significant, sustained, and correlated long-term alleviation of symptoms and increased MIO.

Clinical relevance: The study assesses the sole effect of dextrose prolotherapy on relieving the signs of TMJ anterior disc displacement apart from the impact of the penetrating needle.

Clinical trial registration: The study was registered on www.

Clinicaltrials: gov (#: NCT05821985) by Ahmed Nagi Alghandour.

Abstract Image

评估葡萄糖增殖疗法与深部干针疗法治疗颞下颌关节前椎间盘移位并还原的效果:(随机对照试验)。
目的:比较颞下颌关节(TMJ)前椎间盘移位综合治疗和深部干针疗法(DDN)对缓解颞下颌关节(TMJ)前椎间盘移位症状的效果:临床试验随机分配了四十名患者。对照组)患者接受了四次关节内和咀嚼肌DDN治疗,而(研究组)患者则接受了精确技术,然后注射了Prolosolution。术前基线测量包括最大颌间开度(MIO)、咔嗒声听诊和视觉模拟量表(VAS),术后1个月、2个月、5个月和8个月后重复测量:研究结束时,所有患者的疼痛 MIO 和咔嗒声均有明显改善。组间和组内比较显示,对照组五个月和八个月后的疼痛评分值明显高于研究组。与对照组相比,研究组的 MIO 校正更为明显,两组在任何时间间隔内出现的咔嗒声差异均不明显。试验组的咔嗒声与 VAS 值之间、咔嗒声与 MIO 之间以及 VAS 值与 MIO 增加之间的关系均为正相关,而对照组为负相关:结论:葡萄糖丙种球蛋白疗法和 DDN 均有益处。临床相关性:临床试验注册:该研究评估了颞下颌关节前椎间盘移位症状的缓解效果,而不考虑穿刺针的影响:该研究由 Ahmed Nagi Alghandour 在 www.Clinicaltrials: gov 上注册(编号:NCT05821985)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信