The Development of a New Approach for the Harmonized Multi-Sectoral and Multi-Country Cost Valuation of Services: The PECUNIA Reference Unit Cost (RUC) Templates.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Susanne Mayer, Michael Berger, Nataša Perić, Claudia Fischer, Alexander Konnopka, Valentin Brodszky, Silvia M A A Evers, Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen, Mencia Ruiz Guitérrez Colosia, Luis Salvador-Carulla, A-La Park, Joanna Thorn, Lidia García-Pérez, Judit Simon
{"title":"The Development of a New Approach for the Harmonized Multi-Sectoral and Multi-Country Cost Valuation of Services: The PECUNIA Reference Unit Cost (RUC) Templates.","authors":"Susanne Mayer, Michael Berger, Nataša Perić, Claudia Fischer, Alexander Konnopka, Valentin Brodszky, Silvia M A A Evers, Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen, Mencia Ruiz Guitérrez Colosia, Luis Salvador-Carulla, A-La Park, Joanna Thorn, Lidia García-Pérez, Judit Simon","doi":"10.1007/s40258-024-00905-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing healthcare costs require evidence-based resource use allocation for which assessing costs rigorously and comparably is crucial. Harmonized cross-country costing methods for evaluating interventions from a societal perspective are lacking. This study presents the development process and content of the service costing templates developed as part of the European project PECUNIA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The six developmental steps towards technological readiness of the templates included (1) a common conceptual costing framework and review of methodological costing issues, (2) harmonization strategy formulation, (3) proof-of-concept with expert feedback, (4) piloting, (5) validation, and (6) demonstration in six European countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PECUNIA Reference Unit Cost (RUC) Templates for service costing are three new self-completion tools to be used with secondary or primary data for top-down micro-costing or top-down gross-costing approaches. Complementary data collection and unit cost aggregation/weighting templates are available. The applications leading to the final versions including (4) piloting through calculation of 15-unit costs, (5) validation within a Health Technology Assessment framework, and (6) RUC calculations mostly based on secondary data demonstrated the templates' general feasibility, with feedback for improved usability incorporated and a supplementary user guide developed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The validated PECUNIA RUC Templates for multi-sectoral and multi-country service costing allow for harmonized RUC development while incorporating flexibility and transparency in the choice of costing approaches, data sources and magnitude of remaining heterogeneity. The templates are expected to significantly improve the quality, comparability and availability of unit costs for economic evaluations, and promote the transferability of service cost information across Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-024-00905-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increasing healthcare costs require evidence-based resource use allocation for which assessing costs rigorously and comparably is crucial. Harmonized cross-country costing methods for evaluating interventions from a societal perspective are lacking. This study presents the development process and content of the service costing templates developed as part of the European project PECUNIA.

Methods: The six developmental steps towards technological readiness of the templates included (1) a common conceptual costing framework and review of methodological costing issues, (2) harmonization strategy formulation, (3) proof-of-concept with expert feedback, (4) piloting, (5) validation, and (6) demonstration in six European countries.

Results: The PECUNIA Reference Unit Cost (RUC) Templates for service costing are three new self-completion tools to be used with secondary or primary data for top-down micro-costing or top-down gross-costing approaches. Complementary data collection and unit cost aggregation/weighting templates are available. The applications leading to the final versions including (4) piloting through calculation of 15-unit costs, (5) validation within a Health Technology Assessment framework, and (6) RUC calculations mostly based on secondary data demonstrated the templates' general feasibility, with feedback for improved usability incorporated and a supplementary user guide developed.

Conclusion: The validated PECUNIA RUC Templates for multi-sectoral and multi-country service costing allow for harmonized RUC development while incorporating flexibility and transparency in the choice of costing approaches, data sources and magnitude of remaining heterogeneity. The templates are expected to significantly improve the quality, comparability and availability of unit costs for economic evaluations, and promote the transferability of service cost information across Europe.

Abstract Image

制定统一的多部门和多国服务成本估价新方法:PECUNIA 参考单位成本(RUC)模板。
背景:日益增长的医疗成本要求以证据为基础进行资源使用分配,为此,对成本进行严格和可比的评估至关重要。目前还缺乏从社会角度评估干预措施的统一的跨国成本计算方法。本研究介绍了作为欧洲项目 PECUNIA 的一部分而开发的服务成本计算模板的开发过程和内容:方法:模板技术就绪的六个开发步骤包括:(1)共同概念成本计算框架和成本计算方法问题审查;(2)统一战略制定;(3)专家反馈概念验证;(4)试点;(5)验证;(6)在六个欧洲国家进行示范:用于服务成本计算的 PECUNIA 参考单位成本(RUC)模板是三个新的自我填写工具,可与二级或一级数据一起用于自上而下的微观成本计算或自上而下的总成本计算方法。还提供补充数据收集和单位成本汇总/加权模板。最终版本的应用包括:(4) 通过计算 15 个单位成本进行试点;(5) 在卫生技术评估框架内进行验证;(6) 主要基于二级数据进行 RUC 计算,这些应用证明了模板的总体可行性,并纳入了关于改进可用性的反馈意见,还编制了补充用户指南:经过验证的用于多部门和多国服务成本计算的 PECUNIA RUC 模板允许统一 RUC 的制定,同时在选择成本计算方法、数据来源和剩余异质性的程度方面具有灵活性和透明度。预计这些模板将大大提高经济评估单位成本的质量、可比性和可用性,并促进服务成本信息在欧洲范围内的可转移性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy provides timely publication of cutting-edge research and expert opinion from this increasingly important field, making it a vital resource for payers, providers and researchers alike. The journal includes high quality economic research and reviews of all aspects of healthcare from various perspectives and countries, designed to communicate the latest applied information in health economics and health policy. While emphasis is placed on information with practical applications, a strong basis of underlying scientific rigor is maintained.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信