Closed-Loop Insulin Therapy for People With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With an Insulin Pump: A 12-Week Multicenter, Open-Label Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Trial.

Diabetes care Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.2337/dc24-0623
Anne-Laure Borel, Sandrine Lablanche, Christine Waterlot, Eloïse Joffray, Céline Barra, Nathalie Arnol, Hafid Amougay, Pierre-Yves Benhamou
{"title":"Closed-Loop Insulin Therapy for People With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With an Insulin Pump: A 12-Week Multicenter, Open-Label Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Trial.","authors":"Anne-Laure Borel, Sandrine Lablanche, Christine Waterlot, Eloïse Joffray, Céline Barra, Nathalie Arnol, Hafid Amougay, Pierre-Yves Benhamou","doi":"10.2337/dc24-0623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) combined with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) achieves better glycemic control than multi-injection therapy in people with type 2 diabetes. The effectiveness of closed-loop therapy needs to be further evaluated in this population.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The study objective was to measure the impact of a hybrid closed-loop device (DBLG1) compared with CSII + CGM on glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes previously treated with CSII. The randomized, controlled, crossover, two-period, open-label, and multicenter study was conducted from August 2022 to July 2023 in 17 individuals (9 to receive 6 weeks of CSII + CGM first and 8 to receive 6 weeks of closed-loop therapy first). The primary end point was the percentage time in range (TIR: 70-180 mg/dL). Secondary outcomes were other CGM-glucose metrics, physical activity, and sleep objectively measured using 1-week actimetry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were analyzed using a modified intention-to-treat approach. Mean age was 63 (SD 9) years and 35% were women. Mean HbA1c at inclusion was 7.9% (SD 0.9). TIR increased to 76.0% (interquartile range 69.0-84.0) during the closed-loop condition vs. 61.0% (interquartile range 55.0-70.0) during the CSII + CGM condition; mean difference was 15.0 percentage points (interquartile range 8.0-22.0; P < 0.001). Analyses of secondary end points showed a decrease in time above range, in glucose management indicator, in glucose variability, and an increase in daily insulin dose. Actimetric sleep analysis showed an improvement in sleep fragmentation during closed-loop treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Closed-loop therapy improved glycemic control more than did CSII + CGM in people with type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"1778-1786"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-0623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) combined with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) achieves better glycemic control than multi-injection therapy in people with type 2 diabetes. The effectiveness of closed-loop therapy needs to be further evaluated in this population.

Research design and methods: The study objective was to measure the impact of a hybrid closed-loop device (DBLG1) compared with CSII + CGM on glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes previously treated with CSII. The randomized, controlled, crossover, two-period, open-label, and multicenter study was conducted from August 2022 to July 2023 in 17 individuals (9 to receive 6 weeks of CSII + CGM first and 8 to receive 6 weeks of closed-loop therapy first). The primary end point was the percentage time in range (TIR: 70-180 mg/dL). Secondary outcomes were other CGM-glucose metrics, physical activity, and sleep objectively measured using 1-week actimetry.

Results: Data were analyzed using a modified intention-to-treat approach. Mean age was 63 (SD 9) years and 35% were women. Mean HbA1c at inclusion was 7.9% (SD 0.9). TIR increased to 76.0% (interquartile range 69.0-84.0) during the closed-loop condition vs. 61.0% (interquartile range 55.0-70.0) during the CSII + CGM condition; mean difference was 15.0 percentage points (interquartile range 8.0-22.0; P < 0.001). Analyses of secondary end points showed a decrease in time above range, in glucose management indicator, in glucose variability, and an increase in daily insulin dose. Actimetric sleep analysis showed an improvement in sleep fragmentation during closed-loop treatment.

Conclusions: Closed-loop therapy improved glycemic control more than did CSII + CGM in people with type 2 diabetes.

针对使用胰岛素泵治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的闭环胰岛素疗法:一项为期 12 周的多中心、开放标签、随机对照、交叉试验。
目的:在2型糖尿病患者中,连续血糖监测(CGM)与连续皮下注射胰岛素(CSII)相结合比多次注射疗法能更好地控制血糖。研究设计和方法:研究目的是测量混合闭环设备(DBLG1)与CSII+CGM相比对曾接受过CSII治疗的2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响。这项随机、对照、交叉、两阶段、开放标签和多中心研究于 2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 7 月在 17 人(9 人先接受 6 周 CSII + CGM 治疗,8 人先接受 6 周闭环治疗)中进行。主要终点是血糖在范围内的时间百分比(TIR:70-180 mg/dL)。次要结果是其他 CGM 血糖指标、体力活动和使用 1 周动测法客观测量的睡眠:采用改良的意向治疗法对数据进行了分析。平均年龄为 63 岁(SD 9),35% 为女性。纳入时的平均 HbA1c 为 7.9% (SD 0.9)。在闭环条件下,TIR 上升至 76.0%(四分位间范围 69.0-84.0),而在 CSII + CGM 条件下,TIR 上升至 61.0%(四分位间范围 55.0-70.0);平均差异为 15.0 个百分点(四分位间范围 8.0-22.0;P < 0.001)。对次要终点的分析表明,超过量程的时间减少了,血糖管理指标降低了,血糖变异性降低了,每日胰岛素剂量增加了。动觉睡眠分析显示,在闭环疗法期间,睡眠片段有所改善:闭环疗法对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的改善程度高于 CSII + CGM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信