Jason S McCarley, Matthew Knight, Kingsley Fletcher
{"title":"Decision support improves information integration and criterion placement in a multi-cue signal-identification task.","authors":"Jason S McCarley, Matthew Knight, Kingsley Fletcher","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2024.2386562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying contacts in a military context can require operators to integrate multiple cues and to adjust response criteria to event base rates. The current experiment tested whether support from a decision aid would improve these processes. Participants performed a signal identification task that required them to integrate cues displayed as visual scale readings. In a static condition, participants saw a single set of readings each trial. In dynamic conditions, readings were updated over time. Base rates of signal categories were unequal, requiring participants to adopt biased response criteria to maximise response accuracy. Participants worked with or without an aid that combined cues and base rate information in an ideal manner. Support from the aid pushed participants' response criteria towards optimal and improved integration of dynamic cues. Decision aids may be especially useful when task demands require biased response criteria and when cues are sampled over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2386562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Identifying contacts in a military context can require operators to integrate multiple cues and to adjust response criteria to event base rates. The current experiment tested whether support from a decision aid would improve these processes. Participants performed a signal identification task that required them to integrate cues displayed as visual scale readings. In a static condition, participants saw a single set of readings each trial. In dynamic conditions, readings were updated over time. Base rates of signal categories were unequal, requiring participants to adopt biased response criteria to maximise response accuracy. Participants worked with or without an aid that combined cues and base rate information in an ideal manner. Support from the aid pushed participants' response criteria towards optimal and improved integration of dynamic cues. Decision aids may be especially useful when task demands require biased response criteria and when cues are sampled over time.
期刊介绍:
Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives.
The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people.
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.