Comparison of state-of-the-art biopsy systems for ultrasound-guided breast biopsy using a chicken breast phantom.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Leona Katsuta, Tomoyuki Fujioka, Kazunori Kubota, Mio Mori, Emi Yamaga, Yuka Yashima, Arisa Sato, Mio Adachi, Toshiyuki Ishiba, Goshi Oda, Tsuyoshi Nakagawa, Ukihide Tateishi
{"title":"Comparison of state-of-the-art biopsy systems for ultrasound-guided breast biopsy using a chicken breast phantom.","authors":"Leona Katsuta, Tomoyuki Fujioka, Kazunori Kubota, Mio Mori, Emi Yamaga, Yuka Yashima, Arisa Sato, Mio Adachi, Toshiyuki Ishiba, Goshi Oda, Tsuyoshi Nakagawa, Ukihide Tateishi","doi":"10.1007/s10396-024-01482-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare different biopsy systems with different-sized needles by determining the weight of the tissue cores, which is one of the important factors for precise pathological diagnoses, and to provide a rationale for choosing the appropriate breast biopsy system with the appropriate needle for breast cancer biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six different vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) systems and one core needle biopsy (CNB) system with different-sized needles in different modes were compared, representing 15 total combinations. Tissue cores were obtained from a chicken breast phantom, which is a common substitute for human breast tissue. Five cores were taken for each combination and weighed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CNB combination provided significantly lighter tissue cores compared with the VAB combinations with the same-size (14-G) needle (P < 0.01). The combinations using the thickest needle obtained the heaviest among all systems (P < 0.02). The untethered battery-free VAB system yielded the lightest specimen among the VAB systems with the same-sized (12-G) needle (P < 0.04). The percent coefficient of variation (%CV) of the core weights obtained using VAB without a basket was significantly smaller compared with the core weights obtained using VAB with a basket (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VAB systems can yield larger tissue cores compared with CNB systems. The size of the tissue cores varies even with the same-sized needle among different VAB systems. When performing a breast tissue biopsy, it is important to consider not only CNB versus VAB but also what specific device to use with which needle size.</p>","PeriodicalId":50130,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ultrasonics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ultrasonics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-024-01482-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare different biopsy systems with different-sized needles by determining the weight of the tissue cores, which is one of the important factors for precise pathological diagnoses, and to provide a rationale for choosing the appropriate breast biopsy system with the appropriate needle for breast cancer biopsy.

Methods: Six different vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) systems and one core needle biopsy (CNB) system with different-sized needles in different modes were compared, representing 15 total combinations. Tissue cores were obtained from a chicken breast phantom, which is a common substitute for human breast tissue. Five cores were taken for each combination and weighed.

Results: The CNB combination provided significantly lighter tissue cores compared with the VAB combinations with the same-size (14-G) needle (P < 0.01). The combinations using the thickest needle obtained the heaviest among all systems (P < 0.02). The untethered battery-free VAB system yielded the lightest specimen among the VAB systems with the same-sized (12-G) needle (P < 0.04). The percent coefficient of variation (%CV) of the core weights obtained using VAB without a basket was significantly smaller compared with the core weights obtained using VAB with a basket (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: VAB systems can yield larger tissue cores compared with CNB systems. The size of the tissue cores varies even with the same-sized needle among different VAB systems. When performing a breast tissue biopsy, it is important to consider not only CNB versus VAB but also what specific device to use with which needle size.

Abstract Image

使用鸡胸模型对超声引导乳腺活检的先进活检系统进行比较。
目的:通过确定组织核心的重量(这是精确病理诊断的重要因素之一)来比较使用不同尺寸针头的不同活检系统,为选择合适的乳腺活检系统和合适的针头进行乳腺癌活检提供理论依据:方法:比较了六种不同的真空辅助活检(VAB)系统和一种核心针活检(CNB)系统,它们在不同模式下使用不同尺寸的针,总共有 15 种组合。组织核心取自鸡胸模型,鸡胸模型是人体乳腺组织的常用替代品。每个组合取 5 个组织核心并称重:结果:与使用相同规格(14-G)针头的 VAB 组合相比,CNB 组合提供的组织核明显更轻(P 结论:CNB 组合提供的组织核明显更轻:与 CNB 系统相比,VAB 系统能产生更大的组织核。在不同的 VAB 系统中,即使使用相同大小的针头,组织核的大小也不尽相同。在进行乳腺组织活检时,不仅要考虑 CNB 与 VAB,还要考虑使用哪种特定设备和哪种尺寸的针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
102
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Ultrasonics is the official journal of the Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine. The main purpose of the journal is to provide forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the entire field of ultrasound in medicine and biology, encompassing both the medical and the engineering aspects of the science.The journal welcomes original articles, review articles, images, and letters to the editor.The journal also provides state-of-the-art information such as announcements from the boards and the committees of the society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信