The Respiratory Compensation Point: Mechanisms and Relation to the Maximal Metabolic Steady State.

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Daniel A Keir, Silvia Pogliaghi, Erin Calaine Inglis, Juan M Murias, Danilo Iannetta
{"title":"The Respiratory Compensation Point: Mechanisms and Relation to the Maximal Metabolic Steady State.","authors":"Daniel A Keir, Silvia Pogliaghi, Erin Calaine Inglis, Juan M Murias, Danilo Iannetta","doi":"10.1007/s40279-024-02084-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>At a point during the latter third of an incremental exercise protocol, ventilation begins to exceed the rate of clearance of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) at the lungs ( <math><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </math> CO<sub>2</sub>). The onset of this hyperventilation, which is confirmed by a fall from a period of stability in end-tidal and arterial CO<sub>2</sub> tensions (PCO<sub>2</sub>), is referred to as the respiratory compensation point (RCP). The mechanisms that contribute to the RCP remain debated as does its surrogacy for the maximal metabolic steady state of constant-power exercise (i.e., the highest work rate associated with maintenance of physiological steady state). The objective of this current opinion is to summarize the original research contributions that support and refute the hypotheses that: (i) the RCP represents a rapid, peripheral chemoreceptor-mediated reflex response engaged when the metabolic rate at which the buffering systems can no longer constrain the rise in hydrogen ions ([H<sup>+</sup>]) associated with rising lactate concentration and metabolic CO<sub>2</sub> production is surpassed; and (ii) the metabolic rate at which this occurs is equivalent to the maximal metabolic steady state of constant power exercise. In doing so, we will shed light on potential mechanisms contributing to the RCP, attempt to reconcile disparate findings, make a case for its adoption for exercise intensity stratification and propose strategies for the use of RCP in aerobic exercise prescription.</p>","PeriodicalId":21969,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02084-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At a point during the latter third of an incremental exercise protocol, ventilation begins to exceed the rate of clearance of carbon dioxide (CO2) at the lungs ( V ˙ CO2). The onset of this hyperventilation, which is confirmed by a fall from a period of stability in end-tidal and arterial CO2 tensions (PCO2), is referred to as the respiratory compensation point (RCP). The mechanisms that contribute to the RCP remain debated as does its surrogacy for the maximal metabolic steady state of constant-power exercise (i.e., the highest work rate associated with maintenance of physiological steady state). The objective of this current opinion is to summarize the original research contributions that support and refute the hypotheses that: (i) the RCP represents a rapid, peripheral chemoreceptor-mediated reflex response engaged when the metabolic rate at which the buffering systems can no longer constrain the rise in hydrogen ions ([H+]) associated with rising lactate concentration and metabolic CO2 production is surpassed; and (ii) the metabolic rate at which this occurs is equivalent to the maximal metabolic steady state of constant power exercise. In doing so, we will shed light on potential mechanisms contributing to the RCP, attempt to reconcile disparate findings, make a case for its adoption for exercise intensity stratification and propose strategies for the use of RCP in aerobic exercise prescription.

Abstract Image

呼吸补偿点:机制及与最大代谢稳态的关系。
在递增运动方案的后三分之一时间内,通气量开始超过肺部二氧化碳(CO2)的清除率(V ˙ CO2)。潮气末和动脉二氧化碳张力(PCO2)从稳定期开始下降,证实了这种过度通气的开始,被称为呼吸补偿点(RCP)。导致 RCP 的机制仍存在争议,而 RCP 代替恒定功率运动的最大代谢稳态(即与维持生理稳态相关的最高工作率)也存在争议。本观点旨在总结支持和反驳以下假设的原创性研究成果:(i) 当缓冲系统无法再限制与乳酸浓度上升和代谢产生二氧化碳相关的氢离子([H+])上升的代谢率时,RCP 代表了一种由外周化学感受器介导的快速反射反应;以及 (ii) 发生这种反应的代谢率相当于恒定功率运动的最大代谢稳定状态。在此过程中,我们将阐明导致 RCP 的潜在机制,尝试调和不同的研究结果,提出采用 RCP 进行运动强度分层的理由,并提出在有氧运动处方中使用 RCP 的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Medicine
Sports Medicine 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
165
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Medicine focuses on providing definitive and comprehensive review articles that interpret and evaluate current literature, aiming to offer insights into research findings in the sports medicine and exercise field. The journal covers major topics such as sports medicine and sports science, medical syndromes associated with sport and exercise, clinical medicine's role in injury prevention and treatment, exercise for rehabilitation and health, and the application of physiological and biomechanical principles to specific sports. Types of Articles: Review Articles: Definitive and comprehensive reviews that interpret and evaluate current literature to provide rationale for and application of research findings. Leading/Current Opinion Articles: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues in the field. Original Research Articles: High-quality research articles. Enhanced Features: Additional features like slide sets, videos, and animations aimed at increasing the visibility, readership, and educational value of the journal's content. Plain Language Summaries: Summaries accompanying articles to assist readers in understanding important medical advances. Peer Review Process: All manuscripts undergo peer review by international experts to ensure quality and rigor. The journal also welcomes Letters to the Editor, which will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信