Chemical gasification: An alternative approach to in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes.

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
David L Gómez-López, Diego A Velasco-Acosta, Aldemar Chávez-Rodríguez, Augusto Schneider, Juan F Rocha, Diego F Dubeibe-Marín
{"title":"Chemical gasification: An alternative approach to in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes.","authors":"David L Gómez-López, Diego A Velasco-Acosta, Aldemar Chávez-Rodríguez, Augusto Schneider, Juan F Rocha, Diego F Dubeibe-Marín","doi":"10.1111/rda.14701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of chemical gasification and HEPES as alternative systems to pH control during in vitro maturation on bovine oocytes competence. Groups of 20 bovine cumulus oocytes complexes (COCs) were randomly distributed and cultured for 24 h in one of the following experimental groups: (i) chemical reaction (ChRG) system: CO2 generated from sodium bicarbonate and citric acid reaction (ii) culture media TCM-HEPES (HEPES-G); and (iii) control group (CNTG) in conventional incubator. After in vitro maturation (IVM), the COCs were in vitro fertilized (IVF), and in vitro cultivated (IVC) in a conventional incubator. We evaluated oocyte nuclear maturation, cleavage and blastocyst rates, in addition to the relative mRNA expression of BAX, BMP-15, AREG and EREG genes in oocytes and cumulus cells. The proportion of oocytes in metaphase II was higher in CNTG and ChRG (77.57% and 77.06%) than in the HEPES-G (65.32%; p = .0408 and .0492, respectively). The blastocyst production was similar between CNTG and ChRG (26.20% and 28.47%; p = .4232) and lower (p = .001) in the HEPES-G (18.71%). The relative mRNA expression of BAX gene in cumulus cells was significantly higher (p = .0190) in the HEPES-G compared to the CNTG. Additionally, the relative mRNA expression of BMP-15 gene was lower (p = .03) in oocytes from HEPES-G compared to the CNTG. In conclusion, inadequate atmosphere control has a detrimental effect on oocyte maturation. Yet, the use of chemical gasification can be an efficient alternative to bovine COCs cultivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21035,"journal":{"name":"Reproduction in Domestic Animals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproduction in Domestic Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.14701","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of chemical gasification and HEPES as alternative systems to pH control during in vitro maturation on bovine oocytes competence. Groups of 20 bovine cumulus oocytes complexes (COCs) were randomly distributed and cultured for 24 h in one of the following experimental groups: (i) chemical reaction (ChRG) system: CO2 generated from sodium bicarbonate and citric acid reaction (ii) culture media TCM-HEPES (HEPES-G); and (iii) control group (CNTG) in conventional incubator. After in vitro maturation (IVM), the COCs were in vitro fertilized (IVF), and in vitro cultivated (IVC) in a conventional incubator. We evaluated oocyte nuclear maturation, cleavage and blastocyst rates, in addition to the relative mRNA expression of BAX, BMP-15, AREG and EREG genes in oocytes and cumulus cells. The proportion of oocytes in metaphase II was higher in CNTG and ChRG (77.57% and 77.06%) than in the HEPES-G (65.32%; p = .0408 and .0492, respectively). The blastocyst production was similar between CNTG and ChRG (26.20% and 28.47%; p = .4232) and lower (p = .001) in the HEPES-G (18.71%). The relative mRNA expression of BAX gene in cumulus cells was significantly higher (p = .0190) in the HEPES-G compared to the CNTG. Additionally, the relative mRNA expression of BMP-15 gene was lower (p = .03) in oocytes from HEPES-G compared to the CNTG. In conclusion, inadequate atmosphere control has a detrimental effect on oocyte maturation. Yet, the use of chemical gasification can be an efficient alternative to bovine COCs cultivation.

化学气化:牛卵母细胞体外成熟的替代方法。
本研究旨在评估化学气化和 HEPES 作为体外成熟过程中 pH 值控制的替代系统对牛卵母细胞能力的影响。随机分配 20 组牛积层卵母细胞复合体(COCs),在以下实验组之一中培养 24 小时:(i) 化学反应(ChRG)系统:(ii)培养基 TCM-HEPES (HEPES-G);(iii)常规培养箱中的对照组(CNTG)。体外成熟(IVM)后,COC 在常规培养箱中进行体外受精(IVF)和体外培养(IVC)。我们评估了卵母细胞核成熟度、裂解率和囊胚率,以及卵母细胞和积层细胞中 BAX、BMP-15、AREG 和 EREG 基因的相对 mRNA 表达。在 CNTG 和 ChRG 中,处于分裂后期 II 的卵母细胞比例(77.57% 和 77.06%)高于 HEPES-G(65.32%;p = .0408 和 .0492)。CNTG 和 ChRG 的囊胚产量相似(26.20% 和 28.47%;p = .4232),而 HEPES-G 的囊胚产量较低(18.71%)(p = .001)。与 CNTG 相比,HEPES-G 中积液细胞中 BAX 基因的相对 mRNA 表达量明显更高(p = .0190)。此外,与 CNTG 相比,来自 HEPES-G 的卵母细胞中 BMP-15 基因的相对 mRNA 表达量较低(p = .03)。总之,气氛控制不当会对卵母细胞的成熟产生不利影响。然而,使用化学气化技术可以有效替代牛 COCs 培养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproduction in Domestic Animals
Reproduction in Domestic Animals 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
238
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal offers comprehensive information concerning physiology, pathology, and biotechnology of reproduction. Topical results are currently published in original papers, reviews, and short communications with particular attention to investigations on practicable techniques. Carefully selected reports, e. g. on embryo transfer and associated biotechnologies, gene transfer, and spermatology provide a link between basic research and clinical application. The journal applies to breeders, veterinarians, and biologists, and is also of interest in human medicine. Interdisciplinary cooperation is documented in the proceedings of the joint annual meetings. Fields of interest: Animal reproduction and biotechnology with special regard to investigations on applied and clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信