Incidence and predictors of attrition from HIV treatment among adults living with HIV in high-caseload facilities following implementation of universal test and treat strategy in Ethiopia: A prospective cohort study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
HIV Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1111/hiv.13691
Alemayehu Bekele, Ismael Ahmed, Fana Tefera, Jemal Ayalew Yimam, Fasil Tessema Woldeselassie, Getinet Abera, Jelaludin Ahmed, Alemayehu Mekonnen, Ashenafi Haile, Fikerte Yohannes, Mirtie Getachew, Saro Abdella, Minesh Shah
{"title":"Incidence and predictors of attrition from HIV treatment among adults living with HIV in high-caseload facilities following implementation of universal test and treat strategy in Ethiopia: A prospective cohort study.","authors":"Alemayehu Bekele, Ismael Ahmed, Fana Tefera, Jemal Ayalew Yimam, Fasil Tessema Woldeselassie, Getinet Abera, Jelaludin Ahmed, Alemayehu Mekonnen, Ashenafi Haile, Fikerte Yohannes, Mirtie Getachew, Saro Abdella, Minesh Shah","doi":"10.1111/hiv.13691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The introduction of universal test and treat (UTT) strategy has demonstrated a reduction in attrition in some low-resource settings. UTT was introduced in Ethiopia in 2016. However, there is a paucity of information regarding the magnitude and predictors of attrition from HIV treatment in Ethiopia. This study aims to assess the incidence and predictors of attrition from HIV treatment among adults living with HIV (PLHIV) in high-caseload facilities following the implementation of universal test and treat strategy in Ethiopia from March 2019 to June 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort of individuals in HIV care from 39 high-caseload facilities in Oromia, Amhara, Tigray, Addis Ababa and Dire Dawa regions of Ethiopia was conducted for 12 months. Participants were adults aged 15 year and older who were first testers recruited for 3 months from March to June 2019. Subsequent follow-up was for 12 months, with data collected on sociodemographic and clinical conditions at baseline, 6 and 12 months and attrition at 6 and 12 months. We defined attrition as discontinuation from follow-up care due to loss to follow-up, dropout or death. Data were collected using Open Data Kit at field level and aggregated centrally. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was employed to assess survival probability to the time of attrition from treatment. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to measure association of baseline predictor variables with the proportion of antiretroviral therapy (ART) patients retained in ART during the follow up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall incidence rate for attrition from HIV treatment among the study participants during 12 months of follow-up was 5.02 cases per 1000 person-weeks [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.44-5.68 per 1000 person-weeks]. Study participants from health facilities in Oromia and Addis Ababa/Dire Dawa had 68% and 51% higher risk of attrition from HIV treatment compared with participants from the Amhara region, respectively [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.22-2.32 and AHR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.05-2.17, respectively]. Participants who did not have a child had a 44% higher risk of attrition compared with those who had a child (AHR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.12-1.85). Individuals who did not own mobile phone had a 37% higher risk of attrition than those who owned a mobile phone (AHR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.02-1.83). Ambulatory/bedridden functional status at the time of diagnosis had a 44% higher risk of attrition compared with participants with a working functional status (AHR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.08-1.92) at any time during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall incidence of attrition among people living with HIV enrolled into HIV treatment was not as high as what was reported by other studies. Independent predictors of attrition were administrative regions in Ethiopia where health facilities are located, not having a child, not owning a mobile phone and being ambulatory/bedridden functional status at the time of diagnosis. Concerted efforts should be taken to reduce the magnitude of attrition from HIV treatment and address its drivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":13176,"journal":{"name":"HIV Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.13691","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The introduction of universal test and treat (UTT) strategy has demonstrated a reduction in attrition in some low-resource settings. UTT was introduced in Ethiopia in 2016. However, there is a paucity of information regarding the magnitude and predictors of attrition from HIV treatment in Ethiopia. This study aims to assess the incidence and predictors of attrition from HIV treatment among adults living with HIV (PLHIV) in high-caseload facilities following the implementation of universal test and treat strategy in Ethiopia from March 2019 to June 2020.

Methods: A prospective cohort of individuals in HIV care from 39 high-caseload facilities in Oromia, Amhara, Tigray, Addis Ababa and Dire Dawa regions of Ethiopia was conducted for 12 months. Participants were adults aged 15 year and older who were first testers recruited for 3 months from March to June 2019. Subsequent follow-up was for 12 months, with data collected on sociodemographic and clinical conditions at baseline, 6 and 12 months and attrition at 6 and 12 months. We defined attrition as discontinuation from follow-up care due to loss to follow-up, dropout or death. Data were collected using Open Data Kit at field level and aggregated centrally. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was employed to assess survival probability to the time of attrition from treatment. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to measure association of baseline predictor variables with the proportion of antiretroviral therapy (ART) patients retained in ART during the follow up period.

Results: The overall incidence rate for attrition from HIV treatment among the study participants during 12 months of follow-up was 5.02 cases per 1000 person-weeks [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.44-5.68 per 1000 person-weeks]. Study participants from health facilities in Oromia and Addis Ababa/Dire Dawa had 68% and 51% higher risk of attrition from HIV treatment compared with participants from the Amhara region, respectively [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.22-2.32 and AHR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.05-2.17, respectively]. Participants who did not have a child had a 44% higher risk of attrition compared with those who had a child (AHR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.12-1.85). Individuals who did not own mobile phone had a 37% higher risk of attrition than those who owned a mobile phone (AHR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.02-1.83). Ambulatory/bedridden functional status at the time of diagnosis had a 44% higher risk of attrition compared with participants with a working functional status (AHR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.08-1.92) at any time during the follow-up period.

Conclusion: The overall incidence of attrition among people living with HIV enrolled into HIV treatment was not as high as what was reported by other studies. Independent predictors of attrition were administrative regions in Ethiopia where health facilities are located, not having a child, not owning a mobile phone and being ambulatory/bedridden functional status at the time of diagnosis. Concerted efforts should be taken to reduce the magnitude of attrition from HIV treatment and address its drivers.

埃塞俄比亚实施普遍检测和治疗战略后,高案例量设施中感染艾滋病毒的成人中自然退出艾滋病毒治疗的发生率和预测因素:前瞻性队列研究。
背景:在一些低资源环境中,普遍检测和治疗(UTT)战略的引入已证明减少了自然减员。埃塞俄比亚于 2016 年引入了 UTT。然而,有关埃塞俄比亚艾滋病治疗自然减员的规模和预测因素的信息却很少。本研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚于 2019 年 3 月至 2020 年 6 月实施普遍检测和治疗策略后,高案例量设施中成年 HIV 感染者(PLHIV)从 HIV 治疗中流失的发生率和预测因素:对埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚、阿姆哈拉、提格雷、亚的斯亚贝巴和德雷达瓦地区 39 家高负荷设施中接受 HIV 护理的个人进行了为期 12 个月的前瞻性队列研究。参与者为 15 岁及以上的成年人,他们是 2019 年 3 月至 6 月招募的首次检测者,为期 3 个月。随后进行了为期 12 个月的随访,收集了基线、6 个月和 12 个月的社会人口学和临床情况数据,以及 6 个月和 12 个月的自然减员数据。我们将自然减员定义为因失去随访、辍学或死亡而中断随访护理。我们使用开放数据工具包在实地收集数据,然后集中汇总。我们采用卡普兰-米尔生存分析法来评估从治疗中断时起的生存概率。采用 Cox 比例危险回归模型测量基线预测变量与随访期间继续接受抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)的患者比例之间的关系:在 12 个月的随访期间,研究参与者中艾滋病治疗的总流失率为每千人周 5.02 例[95% 置信区间 (CI):每千人周 4.44-5.68 例]。与阿姆哈拉地区的参与者相比,来自奥罗米亚和亚的斯亚贝巴/德雷达瓦卫生机构的研究参与者从艾滋病治疗中流失的风险分别高出 68% 和 51%[调整后危险比 (AHR) = 1.68,95% 置信区间 (CI):1.22-2.32 和 AHR = 1.51,95% 置信区间 (CI):1.05-2.17]。与有孩子的参与者相比,没有孩子的参与者流失风险高出 44%(AHR = 1.44,95% CI:1.12-1.85)。与拥有手机的人相比,没有手机的人流失风险高出 37%(AHR = 1.37,95% CI:1.02-1.83)。与随访期间任何时候都处于工作状态的参与者相比,诊断时处于非卧床/卧床功能状态的参与者流失风险高出44%(AHR = 1.44,95% CI:1.08-1.92):结论:接受艾滋病治疗的艾滋病病毒感染者的总体流失率并没有其他研究报告的那么高。预测自然减员的独立因素包括:医疗机构所在的埃塞俄比亚行政区域、无子女、无手机以及确诊时的行动/卧床功能状况。应齐心协力降低艾滋病毒治疗的自然减员率,并解决其驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HIV Medicine
HIV Medicine 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: HIV Medicine aims to provide an alternative outlet for publication of international research papers in the field of HIV Medicine, embracing clinical, pharmocological, epidemiological, ethical, preclinical and in vitro studies. In addition, the journal will commission reviews and other feature articles. It will focus on evidence-based medicine as the mainstay of successful management of HIV and AIDS. The journal is specifically aimed at researchers and clinicians with responsibility for treating HIV seropositive patients.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信