Association of trauma classifications to long-term outcome in blunt trauma patients.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Joonas Kuorikoski, Mikko Heinänen, Tuomas Brinck, Tim Söderlund
{"title":"Association of trauma classifications to long-term outcome in blunt trauma patients.","authors":"Joonas Kuorikoski, Mikko Heinänen, Tuomas Brinck, Tim Söderlund","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02606-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The impact of major trauma is long lasting. Although polytrauma patients are currently identified with the Berlin polytrauma criteria, data on long-term outcomes are not available. In this study, we evaluated the association of trauma classification with long-term outcome in blunt-trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A trauma registry of a level I trauma centre was used for patient identification from 1.1.2006 to 31.12.2015. Patients were grouped as follows: (1) all severely injured trauma patients; (2) all severely injured polytrauma patients; 2a) severely injured patients with AIS ≥ 3 on two different body regions (Berlin-); 2b) severely injured patients with polytrauma and a physiological criterion (Berlin+); and (3) a non-polytrauma group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to estimate differences in mortality between different groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 3359 trauma patients for this study. Non-polytrauma was the largest group (2380 [70.9%] patients). A total of 500 (14.9%) patients fulfilled the criteria for Berlin + definition, leaving 479 (14.3%) polytrauma patients in Berlin- group. Berlin + patients had the highest short-term mortality compared with other groups, although the difference in cumulative mortality gradually plateaued compared with the non-polytrauma patient group; at the end of the 10-year follow up, the non-polytrauma group had the greatest mortality due to the high number of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Excess mortality of polytrauma patients by Berlin definition occurs in the early phase (30-day mortality) and late deaths are rare. TBI causes high early mortality followed by increased long-term mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02606-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The impact of major trauma is long lasting. Although polytrauma patients are currently identified with the Berlin polytrauma criteria, data on long-term outcomes are not available. In this study, we evaluated the association of trauma classification with long-term outcome in blunt-trauma patients.

Methods: A trauma registry of a level I trauma centre was used for patient identification from 1.1.2006 to 31.12.2015. Patients were grouped as follows: (1) all severely injured trauma patients; (2) all severely injured polytrauma patients; 2a) severely injured patients with AIS ≥ 3 on two different body regions (Berlin-); 2b) severely injured patients with polytrauma and a physiological criterion (Berlin+); and (3) a non-polytrauma group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to estimate differences in mortality between different groups.

Results: We identified 3359 trauma patients for this study. Non-polytrauma was the largest group (2380 [70.9%] patients). A total of 500 (14.9%) patients fulfilled the criteria for Berlin + definition, leaving 479 (14.3%) polytrauma patients in Berlin- group. Berlin + patients had the highest short-term mortality compared with other groups, although the difference in cumulative mortality gradually plateaued compared with the non-polytrauma patient group; at the end of the 10-year follow up, the non-polytrauma group had the greatest mortality due to the high number of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Conclusion: Excess mortality of polytrauma patients by Berlin definition occurs in the early phase (30-day mortality) and late deaths are rare. TBI causes high early mortality followed by increased long-term mortality.

Abstract Image

创伤分类与钝性创伤患者长期预后的关系。
目的:重大创伤的影响是长期的。尽管目前根据柏林多发性创伤标准对多发性创伤患者进行了鉴定,但却没有关于长期预后的数据。在这项研究中,我们评估了创伤分类与钝性创伤患者长期预后的关系:方法:2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间,一家一级创伤中心的创伤登记处对患者进行了身份识别。患者分组如下(1)所有严重创伤患者;(2)所有严重多发创伤患者;2a)两个不同身体区域AIS≥3的严重创伤患者(柏林-);2b)多发创伤且符合生理标准的严重创伤患者(柏林+);(3)非多发创伤组。我们进行了卡普兰-梅耶生存分析,以估计不同组别之间死亡率的差异:我们为这项研究确定了 3359 名创伤患者。非多发性创伤是最大的组别(2380 名[70.9%]患者)。共有 500 名(14.9%)患者符合 "柏林+"定义标准,剩下的 479 名(14.3%)多发性创伤患者属于 "柏林-"组。与其他组别相比,"柏林+"组患者的短期死亡率最高,但与非多发性创伤患者组相比,累积死亡率的差异逐渐趋于平稳;在10年随访结束时,非多发性创伤组的死亡率最高,原因是有大量患者患有创伤性脑损伤(TBI):结论:根据柏林的定义,多发性创伤患者的高死亡率发生在早期阶段(30 天死亡率),晚期死亡很少见。创伤性脑损伤导致早期死亡率高,随后长期死亡率增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信