Effectiveness of Updated 2023-2024 (Monovalent XBB.1.5) COVID-19 Vaccination Against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB and BA.2.86/JN.1 Lineage Hospitalization and a Comparison of Clinical Severity-IVY Network, 26 Hospitals, October 18, 2023-March 9, 2024.

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Kevin C Ma, Diya Surie, Adam S Lauring, Emily T Martin, Aleda M Leis, Leigh Papalambros, Manjusha Gaglani, Christie Columbus, Robert L Gottlieb, Shekhar Ghamande, Ithan D Peltan, Samuel M Brown, Adit A Ginde, Nicholas M Mohr, Kevin W Gibbs, David N Hager, Safa Saeed, Matthew E Prekker, Michelle Ng Gong, Amira Mohamed, Nicholas J Johnson, Vasisht Srinivasan, Jay S Steingrub, Akram Khan, Catherine L Hough, Abhijit Duggal, Jennifer G Wilson, Nida Qadir, Steven Y Chang, Christopher Mallow, Jennie H Kwon, Bijal Parikh, Matthew C Exline, Ivana A Vaughn, Mayur Ramesh, Basmah Safdar, Jarrod Mosier, Estelle S Harris, Nathan I Shapiro, Jamie Felzer, Yuwei Zhu, Carlos G Grijalva, Natasha Halasa, James D Chappell, Kelsey N Womack, Jillian P Rhoads, Adrienne Baughman, Sydney A Swan, Cassandra A Johnson, Todd W Rice, Jonathan D Casey, Paul W Blair, Jin H Han, Sascha Ellington, Nathaniel M Lewis, Natalie Thornburg, Clinton R Paden, Lydia J Atherton, Wesley H Self, Fatimah S Dawood, Jennifer DeCuir
{"title":"Effectiveness of Updated 2023-2024 (Monovalent XBB.1.5) COVID-19 Vaccination Against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB and BA.2.86/JN.1 Lineage Hospitalization and a Comparison of Clinical Severity-IVY Network, 26 Hospitals, October 18, 2023-March 9, 2024.","authors":"Kevin C Ma, Diya Surie, Adam S Lauring, Emily T Martin, Aleda M Leis, Leigh Papalambros, Manjusha Gaglani, Christie Columbus, Robert L Gottlieb, Shekhar Ghamande, Ithan D Peltan, Samuel M Brown, Adit A Ginde, Nicholas M Mohr, Kevin W Gibbs, David N Hager, Safa Saeed, Matthew E Prekker, Michelle Ng Gong, Amira Mohamed, Nicholas J Johnson, Vasisht Srinivasan, Jay S Steingrub, Akram Khan, Catherine L Hough, Abhijit Duggal, Jennifer G Wilson, Nida Qadir, Steven Y Chang, Christopher Mallow, Jennie H Kwon, Bijal Parikh, Matthew C Exline, Ivana A Vaughn, Mayur Ramesh, Basmah Safdar, Jarrod Mosier, Estelle S Harris, Nathan I Shapiro, Jamie Felzer, Yuwei Zhu, Carlos G Grijalva, Natasha Halasa, James D Chappell, Kelsey N Womack, Jillian P Rhoads, Adrienne Baughman, Sydney A Swan, Cassandra A Johnson, Todd W Rice, Jonathan D Casey, Paul W Blair, Jin H Han, Sascha Ellington, Nathaniel M Lewis, Natalie Thornburg, Clinton R Paden, Lydia J Atherton, Wesley H Self, Fatimah S Dawood, Jennifer DeCuir","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciae405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing variant-specific COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) and severity can inform public health risk assessments and decisions about vaccine composition. BA.2.86 and its descendants, including JN.1 (referred to collectively as \"JN lineages\"), emerged in late 2023 and exhibited substantial divergence from co-circulating XBB lineages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed patients hospitalized with COVID-19-like illness at 26 hospitals in 20 U.S. states admitted October 18, 2023-March 9, 2024. Using a test-negative, case-control design, we estimated effectiveness of an updated 2023-2024 (Monovalent XBB.1.5) COVID-19 vaccine dose against sequence-confirmed XBB and JN lineage hospitalization using logistic regression. Odds of severe outcomes, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or death, were compared for JN versus XBB lineage hospitalizations using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>585 case-patients with XBB lineages, 397 case-patients with JN lineages, and 4,580 control-patients were included. VE in the first 7-89 days after receipt of an updated dose was 54.2% (95% CI = 36.1%-67.1%) against XBB lineage hospitalization and 32.7% (95% CI = 1.9%-53.8%) against JN lineage hospitalization. Odds of ICU admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.80; 95% CI = 0.46-1.38) and IMV or death (aOR 0.69; 95% CI = 0.34-1.40) were not significantly different among JN compared to XBB lineage hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Updated 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccination provided protection against both XBB and JN lineage hospitalization, but protection against the latter may be attenuated by immune escape. Clinical severity of JN lineage hospitalizations was not higher relative to XBB.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae405","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Assessing variant-specific COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) and severity can inform public health risk assessments and decisions about vaccine composition. BA.2.86 and its descendants, including JN.1 (referred to collectively as "JN lineages"), emerged in late 2023 and exhibited substantial divergence from co-circulating XBB lineages.

Methods: We analyzed patients hospitalized with COVID-19-like illness at 26 hospitals in 20 U.S. states admitted October 18, 2023-March 9, 2024. Using a test-negative, case-control design, we estimated effectiveness of an updated 2023-2024 (Monovalent XBB.1.5) COVID-19 vaccine dose against sequence-confirmed XBB and JN lineage hospitalization using logistic regression. Odds of severe outcomes, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or death, were compared for JN versus XBB lineage hospitalizations using logistic regression.

Results: 585 case-patients with XBB lineages, 397 case-patients with JN lineages, and 4,580 control-patients were included. VE in the first 7-89 days after receipt of an updated dose was 54.2% (95% CI = 36.1%-67.1%) against XBB lineage hospitalization and 32.7% (95% CI = 1.9%-53.8%) against JN lineage hospitalization. Odds of ICU admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.80; 95% CI = 0.46-1.38) and IMV or death (aOR 0.69; 95% CI = 0.34-1.40) were not significantly different among JN compared to XBB lineage hospitalizations.

Conclusions: Updated 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccination provided protection against both XBB and JN lineage hospitalization, but protection against the latter may be attenuated by immune escape. Clinical severity of JN lineage hospitalizations was not higher relative to XBB.

2023-2024 年更新版(单价 XBB.1.5)COVID-19 疫苗对 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB 和 BA.2.86/JN.1 系住院治疗的效果以及临床严重程度的比较 - IVY 网络,26 家医院,2023 年 10 月 18 日至 2024 年 3 月 9 日。
背景:评估COVID-19疫苗特异性变异株的有效性(VE)和严重性可为公共卫生风险评估和疫苗构成决策提供信息。BA.2.86及其后代,包括JN.1(统称为 "JN系"),出现于2023年底,与共同流行的XBB系表现出很大的差异:我们分析了 2023 年 10 月 18 日至 2024 年 3 月 9 日在美国 20 个州的 26 家医院住院的 COVID-19 类疾病患者。我们采用检验阴性的病例对照设计,利用逻辑回归估算了2023-2024年更新版(单价XBB.1.5)COVID-19疫苗剂量对序列确认的XBB和JN系住院治疗的有效性。使用逻辑回归法比较了JN系与XBB系住院患者的严重后果几率,包括入住重症监护室(ICU)、侵入性机械通气(IMV)或死亡:结果:共纳入585例XBB系患者、397例JN系患者和4580例对照组患者。在接受更新剂量后的前7-89天内,XBB系住院患者的VE为54.2%(95% CI = 36.1%-67.1%),JN系住院患者的VE为32.7%(95% CI = 1.9%-53.8%)。与XBB系住院相比,JN系住院的ICU入院几率(调整后几率比[aOR] 0.80; 95% CI = 0.46-1.38)和IMV或死亡几率(aOR 0.69; 95% CI = 0.34-1.40)没有显著差异:结论:2023-2024年更新的COVID-19疫苗接种对XBB和JN系住院治疗均有保护作用,但对后者的保护作用可能因免疫逃逸而减弱。与XBB相比,JN系住院患者的临床严重程度并不高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Clinical Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
900
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信