Postoperative pain in oncological patients subjected to nonsurgical root canal treatment: a prospective case-control study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Kaline Romeiro, Luciana F Gominho, Isabela N Rôças, José F Siqueira
{"title":"Postoperative pain in oncological patients subjected to nonsurgical root canal treatment: a prospective case-control study.","authors":"Kaline Romeiro, Luciana F Gominho, Isabela N Rôças, José F Siqueira","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-05866-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain in oncological patients with infected teeth subjected to nonsurgical root canal treatment or retreatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Teeth with apical periodontitis from healthy control patients and oncological patients (n = 70 per group) were root canal treated/retreated and evaluated for the development of postoperative pain. Patients from the two groups were matched for tooth type, gender, clinical manifestation of apical periodontitis, and intervention type. A visual analogue scale (VSA) was used to evaluate the incidence of postoperative pain at 24 h, 72 h, 7d, and 15d after chemomechanical procedures. Data were statistically analyzed for the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative pain occurred in 10% of the individuals and in all these cases pain showed a reduction in intensity or was absent after endodontic intervention at 24-h evaluation. The overall incidence of postoperative pain at 24 h was 14% in oncology patients and 30% in controls (p = 0.03). At 72 h, the respective corresponding figures were 4% and 8.5% (p > 0.05). At 7 and 15 days, all patients were asymptomatic, irrespective of the group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant differences in postoperative pain were found between control and oncological patients. The low incidence of postoperative pain observed in both groups supports the routine use of nonsurgical root canal treatment/retreatment as valid options in oncological patients.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Oncological patients had no increased risk of postoperative pain in comparison with control patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05866-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain in oncological patients with infected teeth subjected to nonsurgical root canal treatment or retreatment.

Methods: Teeth with apical periodontitis from healthy control patients and oncological patients (n = 70 per group) were root canal treated/retreated and evaluated for the development of postoperative pain. Patients from the two groups were matched for tooth type, gender, clinical manifestation of apical periodontitis, and intervention type. A visual analogue scale (VSA) was used to evaluate the incidence of postoperative pain at 24 h, 72 h, 7d, and 15d after chemomechanical procedures. Data were statistically analyzed for the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain in the two groups.

Results: Preoperative pain occurred in 10% of the individuals and in all these cases pain showed a reduction in intensity or was absent after endodontic intervention at 24-h evaluation. The overall incidence of postoperative pain at 24 h was 14% in oncology patients and 30% in controls (p = 0.03). At 72 h, the respective corresponding figures were 4% and 8.5% (p > 0.05). At 7 and 15 days, all patients were asymptomatic, irrespective of the group.

Conclusions: No significant differences in postoperative pain were found between control and oncological patients. The low incidence of postoperative pain observed in both groups supports the routine use of nonsurgical root canal treatment/retreatment as valid options in oncological patients.

Clinical relevance: Oncological patients had no increased risk of postoperative pain in comparison with control patients.

接受非手术根管治疗的肿瘤患者术后疼痛:一项前瞻性病例对照研究。
研究目的这项前瞻性研究的目的是评估接受非手术根管治疗或再治疗的肿瘤患者感染性牙齿术后疼痛的发生率和强度:对健康对照组患者和肿瘤患者(每组 70 人)患有根尖牙周炎的牙齿进行根管治疗/再治疗,并评估术后疼痛的发生情况。两组患者的牙齿类型、性别、根尖牙周炎临床表现和干预类型均匹配。采用视觉模拟量表(VSA)评估化学机械治疗后 24 小时、72 小时、7 天和 15 天的术后疼痛发生率。对两组患者术后疼痛的发生率和强度进行了统计分析:结果:术前疼痛发生率为 10%,所有这些病例在进行牙髓治疗 24 小时评估后,疼痛强度均有所减轻或消失。肿瘤患者术后 24 小时疼痛的总发生率为 14%,对照组为 30%(P = 0.03)。72 小时后,相应的数字分别为 4% 和 8.5% (p > 0.05)。7天和15天时,所有患者均无症状,与组别无关:结论:对照组和肿瘤组患者的术后疼痛无明显差异。结论:对照组和肿瘤患者的术后疼痛无明显差异,两组患者的术后疼痛发生率都很低,这支持肿瘤患者常规使用非手术根管治疗/再治疗作为有效选择:临床意义:与对照组患者相比,肿瘤患者术后疼痛的风险并没有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信