Validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised for Dental.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2024-08-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0029
Marjorie Izabella Batista Aguiar, Maria Beatriz Duarte Gavião, Rogério Lacerda Dos Santos, Renata Andréa Salvitti de Sá Rocha, Taís de Souza Barbosa
{"title":"Validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised for Dental.","authors":"Marjorie Izabella Batista Aguiar, Maria Beatriz Duarte Gavião, Rogério Lacerda Dos Santos, Renata Andréa Salvitti de Sá Rocha, Taís de Souza Barbosa","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the \"Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised for Dental\" (IPQ-RD) in parents/guardians of children aged six to 14 years. The sample consisted of 63 parents/guardians of schoolchildren from the municipal school system of Teófilo Otoni, MG. Remote and virtual data collection consisted of self-completion of personal data, socioeconomic questionnaire and the Brazilian short versions of the \"Parental-Caregiver Perceptions Questionnaire\" (16-P-CPQ) and the \"Family Impact Scale\" (4-FIS). The IPQ-RD was applied by telephone interview. Almost half of the sample belonged to socioeconomic classes C1 and C2. Approximately 1/3 classified their child's oral health as \"regular\" or \"poor\", while 11.1% reported \"strong\" or \"very strong\" impact on their child's well-being. The items most frequently cited as having an impact on the four domains of the 16-P-CPQ were: \"bad breath\" (23.8%), \"mouth breathing\" (20.7%), \"feeling anxious or afraid\" (20.7%), and \"paying attention at school\" (10%). In the 4-FIS, 11.1% \"had little time for themselves or the family\". There were higher IPQ-RD scores in the \"disease coherence\" domain for women and lower values of \"emotional dimensions\" for parents/guardians with incomplete education. The mean IPQ-RD score was 126.4 (±15.1), and domain scores were positively correlated. The internal consistency was \"almost perfect\" for the IPQ-RD total score, ranging from \"moderate\" to \"almost perfect\" for the \"child-control\" and \"child-consequences\" domains. The intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.04 (poor) to 0.68 (substantial). The Brazilian Portuguese version of the IPQ-RD proved to be valid and reliable for assessing the cognitive and emotional perception of parents/guardians about childhood dental caries.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the "Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised for Dental" (IPQ-RD) in parents/guardians of children aged six to 14 years. The sample consisted of 63 parents/guardians of schoolchildren from the municipal school system of Teófilo Otoni, MG. Remote and virtual data collection consisted of self-completion of personal data, socioeconomic questionnaire and the Brazilian short versions of the "Parental-Caregiver Perceptions Questionnaire" (16-P-CPQ) and the "Family Impact Scale" (4-FIS). The IPQ-RD was applied by telephone interview. Almost half of the sample belonged to socioeconomic classes C1 and C2. Approximately 1/3 classified their child's oral health as "regular" or "poor", while 11.1% reported "strong" or "very strong" impact on their child's well-being. The items most frequently cited as having an impact on the four domains of the 16-P-CPQ were: "bad breath" (23.8%), "mouth breathing" (20.7%), "feeling anxious or afraid" (20.7%), and "paying attention at school" (10%). In the 4-FIS, 11.1% "had little time for themselves or the family". There were higher IPQ-RD scores in the "disease coherence" domain for women and lower values of "emotional dimensions" for parents/guardians with incomplete education. The mean IPQ-RD score was 126.4 (±15.1), and domain scores were positively correlated. The internal consistency was "almost perfect" for the IPQ-RD total score, ranging from "moderate" to "almost perfect" for the "child-control" and "child-consequences" domains. The intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.04 (poor) to 0.68 (substantial). The Brazilian Portuguese version of the IPQ-RD proved to be valid and reliable for assessing the cognitive and emotional perception of parents/guardians about childhood dental caries.

巴西版牙科疾病认知问卷(修订版)的有效性和可靠性。
本研究旨在测试巴西版 "牙科疾病认知问卷-修订版"(IPQ-RD)在 6 至 14 岁儿童家长/监护人中的有效性和可靠性。样本包括 63 名来自 MG 省 Teófilo Otoni 市学校系统的学童家长/监护人。远程和虚拟数据收集包括自我填写个人数据、社会经济问卷以及巴西简版 "父母-照顾者感知问卷"(16-P-CPQ)和 "家庭影响量表"(4-FIS)。IPQ-RD 采用电话访谈的方式。近一半的样本属于 C1 和 C2 社会经济阶层。约 1/3 的样本将其子女的口腔健康状况归类为 "一般 "或 "差",11.1% 的样本称其子女的口腔健康状况对其子女的幸福有 "强烈 "或 "非常强烈 "的影响。最常被认为对 16-P-CPQ 的四个领域有影响的项目是"口臭"(23.8%)、"口呼吸"(20.7%)、"感到焦虑或恐惧"(20.7%)和 "在学校注意力不集中"(10%)。在 4-FIS 中,11.1% 的人 "很少有时间陪伴自己或家人"。女性在 "疾病一致性 "方面的 IPQ-RD 得分较高,而未完成学业的父母/监护人在 "情感维度 "方面的得分较低。IPQ-RD 的平均得分为 126.4(±15.1)分,各领域得分呈正相关。IPQ-RD总分的内部一致性为 "几乎完美","儿童控制 "和 "儿童后果 "领域的内部一致性从 "中等 "到 "几乎完美 "不等。类内相关系数从 0.04(较差)到 0.68(相当可观)不等。事实证明,巴西葡萄牙语版的 IPQ-RD 在评估家长/监护人对儿童龋齿的认知和情感看法方面是有效和可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信