Understanding the challenges and successes of implementing 'hybrid' interventions in healthcare settings: findings from a process evaluation of a patient involvement trial.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sarah Hampton, Jenni Murray, Rebecca Lawton, Laura Sheard
{"title":"Understanding the challenges and successes of implementing 'hybrid' interventions in healthcare settings: findings from a process evaluation of a patient involvement trial.","authors":"Sarah Hampton, Jenni Murray, Rebecca Lawton, Laura Sheard","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>'Hybrid' interventions in which some intervention components are fixed across sites and others are flexible (locally created) are thought to allow for adaptation to the local context while maintaining fidelity. However, there is little evidence regarding the challenges and facilitators of implementing hybrid interventions. This paper reports on a process evaluation of a patient safety hybrid intervention called Your Care Needs You (YCNY). YCNY was tested in the Partners at Care Transitions (PACT) randomised controlled trial and aimed to enhance older patients and their families' involvement in their care in order to achieve safer transitions from hospital to home.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The process evaluation took place across eight intervention wards taking part in the PACT trial. 23 interviews and 37 informal conversations were conducted with National Health Service (NHS) staff. Patients (n=19) were interviewed twice, once in hospital and once after discharge. Interviews with staff and patients concerned the delivery and experiences of YCNY. Ethnographic observations (n=81 hours) of relevant activities (eg, multidisciplinary team meetings, handovers, etc) were undertaken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main finding relates to how staff understood and engaged with YCNY, which then had a major influence on its implementation. While staff broadly valued the aims of YCNY, staff from seven out of the eight wards taking part in the process evaluation enacted YCNY in a mostly task-based manner. YCNY implementation often became a hurried activity which concentrated on delivering fixed intervention components rather than a catalyst for culture change around patient involvement. Factors such as understaffing, constraints on staff time and the COVID-19 pandemic contributed towards a 'taskification' of intervention delivery, which meant staff often did not have capacity to creatively devise flexible intervention components. However, one ward with a sense of distributed ownership of YCNY had considerable success implementing flexible components.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Hybrid interventions may allow aspects of an intervention to be adapted to the local context. However, the current constrained and pressured environment of the NHS left staff with little ability to creatively engage with devising flexible intervention components, despite recognising the need for and being motivated to deliver the intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017268","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: 'Hybrid' interventions in which some intervention components are fixed across sites and others are flexible (locally created) are thought to allow for adaptation to the local context while maintaining fidelity. However, there is little evidence regarding the challenges and facilitators of implementing hybrid interventions. This paper reports on a process evaluation of a patient safety hybrid intervention called Your Care Needs You (YCNY). YCNY was tested in the Partners at Care Transitions (PACT) randomised controlled trial and aimed to enhance older patients and their families' involvement in their care in order to achieve safer transitions from hospital to home.

Methods: The process evaluation took place across eight intervention wards taking part in the PACT trial. 23 interviews and 37 informal conversations were conducted with National Health Service (NHS) staff. Patients (n=19) were interviewed twice, once in hospital and once after discharge. Interviews with staff and patients concerned the delivery and experiences of YCNY. Ethnographic observations (n=81 hours) of relevant activities (eg, multidisciplinary team meetings, handovers, etc) were undertaken.

Results: The main finding relates to how staff understood and engaged with YCNY, which then had a major influence on its implementation. While staff broadly valued the aims of YCNY, staff from seven out of the eight wards taking part in the process evaluation enacted YCNY in a mostly task-based manner. YCNY implementation often became a hurried activity which concentrated on delivering fixed intervention components rather than a catalyst for culture change around patient involvement. Factors such as understaffing, constraints on staff time and the COVID-19 pandemic contributed towards a 'taskification' of intervention delivery, which meant staff often did not have capacity to creatively devise flexible intervention components. However, one ward with a sense of distributed ownership of YCNY had considerable success implementing flexible components.

Discussion: Hybrid interventions may allow aspects of an intervention to be adapted to the local context. However, the current constrained and pressured environment of the NHS left staff with little ability to creatively engage with devising flexible intervention components, despite recognising the need for and being motivated to deliver the intervention.

了解在医疗机构实施 "混合 "干预措施的挑战和成功之处:患者参与试验的过程评估结果。
导言:在 "混合 "干预中,一些干预内容在不同地点是固定的,而另一些则是灵活的(当地创造的),这种干预被认为可以适应当地的情况,同时保持忠实性。然而,有关实施混合干预措施的挑战和促进因素的证据却很少。本文报告了一项名为 "你的护理需要你"(YCNY)的患者安全混合干预措施的过程评估。YCNY 在 "护理过渡伙伴"(PACT)随机对照试验中进行了测试,旨在加强老年患者及其家属对护理工作的参与,以实现从医院到家庭的更安全过渡:过程评估在参与 PACT 试验的八个干预病房进行。与国民健康服务(NHS)工作人员进行了 23 次访谈和 37 次非正式谈话。患者(19 人)接受了两次访谈,一次在医院,一次在出院后。与工作人员和患者的访谈涉及到 "青年年 "的实施和体验。对相关活动(如多学科小组会议、交接班等)进行了人种学观察(n=81小时):主要发现与员工如何理解和参与 YCNY 有关,这对其实施产生了重大影响。虽然员工们普遍重视 "青年年 "的目标,但在参与过程评估的 8 个病房中,有 7 个病房的员工在实施 "青年年 "时大多以任务为导向。实施 "青年年 "往往成为一种匆忙的活动,集中于提供固定的干预内容,而不是围绕病人参与的文化变革的催化剂。人手不足、员工时间有限、COVID-19 大流行等因素导致了干预措施的 "任务化",这意味着员工往往没有能力创造性地设计灵活的干预措施。不过,有一个病房在实施灵活的干预措施方面取得了相当大的成功:讨论:混合干预措施可使干预措施的某些方面适应当地情况。然而,由于目前国家医疗服务系统环境的限制和压力,尽管员工认识到实施干预的必要性和积极性,但他们几乎没有能力创造性地参与设计灵活的干预内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信