Adherence to Periodic Dilated Eye Examinations and Its Determinants Among Nepalese Patients With Diagnosed Diabetes: A Single-Center Hospital-Based Analysis Using Health Belief Model.

IF 2.6 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
BioMed Research International Pub Date : 2024-07-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/3231341
Barsha Suwal, Rajan Shrestha, Bijay Khatri, Madan Prasad Upadhyay
{"title":"Adherence to Periodic Dilated Eye Examinations and Its Determinants Among Nepalese Patients With Diagnosed Diabetes: A Single-Center Hospital-Based Analysis Using Health Belief Model.","authors":"Barsha Suwal, Rajan Shrestha, Bijay Khatri, Madan Prasad Upadhyay","doi":"10.1155/2024/3231341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> To find the adherence rate to periodic dilated eye examinations (DEEs) and its determinants among patients with diagnosed diabetes. <b>Research Design and Methods:</b> In this cross-sectional study of 165 participants with diagnosed diabetes (Type 1/2) attending a general hospital with a diabetes clinic, we explored perceptions of barriers and facilitators of DEE at the individual level using a framework adapted from the health belief model (HBM). Patients were compared using t tests for continuous data and chi-square tests for categorical data. <b>Results:</b> The rate of adherence to DEE (as defined by DEE <i>within a year</i>) was 62.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 55.0%-69.8%). The mean age of the patients was 56.81 (±13.29) years. We found that the mean benefit score was significantly higher, and the mean barrier score was significantly lower in those adhering to DEE (<i>p</i> < 0.001); but the susceptibility, severity, and self-efficacy scores were not significantly different. Furthermore, those under treatment for diabetes mellitus (DM), those with diabetic retinopathy (DR) in them or their family member, and those with DM duration of 1 year or less were significantly likely to adhere to DEE (<i>p</i> < 0.005). Additionally, those who had received advice for eye screening from their physicians were about 25 times more likely to adhere to DEE (95% CI =6.80-92.05) than those who were not advised. <b>Conclusion:</b> A larger proportion of people with diabetes did not adhere to periodic DEE. Benefits and barriers were found to be determinants in this population. Further exploration in a larger population and the use of HBM to increase adherence to periodic DEE can be tested by targeting behavioral counseling along with other traditional approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":9007,"journal":{"name":"BioMed Research International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11303040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMed Research International","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3231341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To find the adherence rate to periodic dilated eye examinations (DEEs) and its determinants among patients with diagnosed diabetes. Research Design and Methods: In this cross-sectional study of 165 participants with diagnosed diabetes (Type 1/2) attending a general hospital with a diabetes clinic, we explored perceptions of barriers and facilitators of DEE at the individual level using a framework adapted from the health belief model (HBM). Patients were compared using t tests for continuous data and chi-square tests for categorical data. Results: The rate of adherence to DEE (as defined by DEE within a year) was 62.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 55.0%-69.8%). The mean age of the patients was 56.81 (±13.29) years. We found that the mean benefit score was significantly higher, and the mean barrier score was significantly lower in those adhering to DEE (p < 0.001); but the susceptibility, severity, and self-efficacy scores were not significantly different. Furthermore, those under treatment for diabetes mellitus (DM), those with diabetic retinopathy (DR) in them or their family member, and those with DM duration of 1 year or less were significantly likely to adhere to DEE (p < 0.005). Additionally, those who had received advice for eye screening from their physicians were about 25 times more likely to adhere to DEE (95% CI =6.80-92.05) than those who were not advised. Conclusion: A larger proportion of people with diabetes did not adhere to periodic DEE. Benefits and barriers were found to be determinants in this population. Further exploration in a larger population and the use of HBM to increase adherence to periodic DEE can be tested by targeting behavioral counseling along with other traditional approaches.

尼泊尔确诊糖尿病患者坚持定期散瞳检查及其决定因素:使用健康信念模型的单中心医院分析。
简介:目的调查已确诊糖尿病患者定期散瞳检查(DEE)的坚持率及其决定因素。研究设计与方法:在这项横断面研究中,我们采用健康信念模型(HBM)改编的框架,探讨了个人层面上对散瞳检查的障碍和促进因素的看法,研究对象为在一家设有糖尿病门诊的综合医院就诊的 165 名确诊糖尿病(1/2 型)患者。连续数据采用 t 检验,分类数据采用卡方检验。结果坚持 DEE 的比例(定义为一年内坚持 DEE)为 62.4%(95% 置信区间 [CI] = 55.0%-69.8%)。患者的平均年龄为 56.81 (±13.29) 岁。我们发现,坚持使用 DEE 的患者的平均获益得分明显更高,平均障碍得分明显更低(P < 0.001);但易感性、严重性和自我效能得分没有明显差异。此外,正在接受糖尿病(DM)治疗者、本人或家人患有糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)者以及糖尿病病程在 1 年或 1 年以下者坚持 DEE 的可能性明显增加(p < 0.005)。此外,接受过医生建议进行眼部筛查的人坚持进行 DEE 的可能性是未接受建议者的 25 倍(95% CI =6.80-92.05)。结论较大比例的糖尿病患者没有坚持定期进行眼健康检查。在这一人群中,益处和障碍是决定性因素。可以通过针对行为咨询和其他传统方法,在更大的人群中进行进一步探索,并测试使用 HBM 来提高定期 DEE 的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BioMed Research International
BioMed Research International BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1942
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: BioMed Research International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in life sciences and medicine. The journal is divided into 55 subject areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信