A generalized outcome-adaptive sequential multiple assignment randomized trial design.

IF 1.4 4区 数学 Q3 BIOLOGY
Biometrics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1093/biomtc/ujae073
Xue Yang, Yu Cheng, Peter F Thall, Abdus S Wahed
{"title":"A generalized outcome-adaptive sequential multiple assignment randomized trial design.","authors":"Xue Yang, Yu Cheng, Peter F Thall, Abdus S Wahed","doi":"10.1093/biomtc/ujae073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A dynamic treatment regime (DTR) is a mathematical representation of a multistage decision process. When applied to sequential treatment selection in medical settings, DTRs are useful for identifying optimal therapies for chronic diseases such as AIDs, mental illnesses, substance abuse, and many cancers. Sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs) provide a useful framework for constructing DTRs and providing unbiased between-DTR comparisons. A limitation of SMARTs is that they ignore data from past patients that may be useful for reducing the probability of exposing new patients to inferior treatments. In practice, this may result in decreased treatment adherence or dropouts. To address this problem, we propose a generalized outcome-adaptive (GO) SMART design that adaptively unbalances stage-specific randomization probabilities in favor of treatments observed to be more effective in previous patients. To correct for bias induced by outcome adaptive randomization, we propose G-estimators and inverse-probability-weighted estimators of DTR effects embedded in a GO-SMART and show analytically that they are consistent. We report simulation results showing that, compared to a SMART, Response-Adaptive SMART and SMART with adaptive randomization, a GO-SMART design treats significantly more patients with the optimal DTR and achieves a larger number of total responses while maintaining similar or better statistical power.</p>","PeriodicalId":8930,"journal":{"name":"Biometrics","volume":"80 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc/ujae073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A dynamic treatment regime (DTR) is a mathematical representation of a multistage decision process. When applied to sequential treatment selection in medical settings, DTRs are useful for identifying optimal therapies for chronic diseases such as AIDs, mental illnesses, substance abuse, and many cancers. Sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs) provide a useful framework for constructing DTRs and providing unbiased between-DTR comparisons. A limitation of SMARTs is that they ignore data from past patients that may be useful for reducing the probability of exposing new patients to inferior treatments. In practice, this may result in decreased treatment adherence or dropouts. To address this problem, we propose a generalized outcome-adaptive (GO) SMART design that adaptively unbalances stage-specific randomization probabilities in favor of treatments observed to be more effective in previous patients. To correct for bias induced by outcome adaptive randomization, we propose G-estimators and inverse-probability-weighted estimators of DTR effects embedded in a GO-SMART and show analytically that they are consistent. We report simulation results showing that, compared to a SMART, Response-Adaptive SMART and SMART with adaptive randomization, a GO-SMART design treats significantly more patients with the optimal DTR and achieves a larger number of total responses while maintaining similar or better statistical power.

广义结果适应性顺序多重分配随机试验设计。
动态治疗机制(DTR)是多阶段决策过程的数学表示。当应用于医疗环境中的序贯治疗选择时,动态治疗机制有助于确定慢性疾病(如艾滋病、精神疾病、药物滥用和多种癌症)的最佳疗法。顺序多重分配随机试验(SMART)为构建 DTR 和提供 DTR 之间无偏见的比较提供了一个有用的框架。SMART 的局限性在于,它忽略了过去患者的数据,而这些数据可能有助于降低新患者接受劣质治疗的概率。在实践中,这可能会导致治疗依从性下降或患者放弃治疗。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种广义结果自适应(GO)SMART 设计,它能自适应地取消特定阶段随机化概率的平衡,使之有利于在既往患者身上观察到的更有效的治疗方法。为了纠正结果自适应随机化引起的偏差,我们提出了嵌入 GO-SMART 的 DTR 效果的 G 估计器和反概率加权估计器,并通过分析表明它们是一致的。我们报告的模拟结果表明,与 SMART、反应自适应 SMART 和带有自适应随机化的 SMART 相比,GO-SMART 设计能用最佳 DTR 治疗更多的患者,并获得更多的总反应数,同时保持相似或更好的统计功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biometrics
Biometrics 生物-生物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
178
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Biometric Society is an international society promoting the development and application of statistical and mathematical theory and methods in the biosciences, including agriculture, biomedical science and public health, ecology, environmental sciences, forestry, and allied disciplines. The Society welcomes as members statisticians, mathematicians, biological scientists, and others devoted to interdisciplinary efforts in advancing the collection and interpretation of information in the biosciences. The Society sponsors the biennial International Biometric Conference, held in sites throughout the world; through its National Groups and Regions, it also Society sponsors regional and local meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信