Predictive nomograms and an algorithm for managing patients with probable Meniere's disease

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Roee Noy , Eran Fridman , Ayelet Eran , Aram Keywan , Yona Vaisbuch , Reuven Ishai , Mauricio Cohen-Vaizer
{"title":"Predictive nomograms and an algorithm for managing patients with probable Meniere's disease","authors":"Roee Noy ,&nbsp;Eran Fridman ,&nbsp;Ayelet Eran ,&nbsp;Aram Keywan ,&nbsp;Yona Vaisbuch ,&nbsp;Reuven Ishai ,&nbsp;Mauricio Cohen-Vaizer","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To explore the efficacy of diagnostic tests in accurately reclassifying patients initially diagnosed with probable Meniere's disease (MD) into either definite or non-MD categories.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a neurotology clinic between 1/2016 and 5/2022. Patients underwent a battery of tests, from which sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, as well as positive and negative likelihood ratios, were calculated. Additionally, prediction nomograms were developed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 69 patients, 25 (36.2 %) were initially classified as definite MD, 21 (30.4 %), probable MD, and 23 (33.4 %) non-MD. The mean follow-up was 3.5 years. The sensitivity of electrocochleography (ECochG) was the highest (92 %), with a negative likelihood ratio of 15 %. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with MD-protocol had the highest specificity (100 %), with a positive likelihood ratio of 100 %. Videonystagmography, video head impulse test, and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, had lower sensitivity and specificity. We were able to reclassify 18 (86 %) patients with probable MD: 12 (57 %) were diagnosed with definite MD, and 6 (29 %) were diagnosed with non-MD, consistent with their clinical course.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The combination of ECochG and MRI with MD-protocol provides the most reliable approach to reclassify patients with Probable MD, ensuring a precise and accurate diagnosis. Vestibular tests express the functional status of the labyrinth and may not be reliable. Our findings provide valuable insights into clinical decision-making for patients with Probable MD and raise the consideration of additional diagnostic tests as supplementary to the existing clinical-only diagnosis criteria.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"45 6","pages":"Article 104472"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924002588","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To explore the efficacy of diagnostic tests in accurately reclassifying patients initially diagnosed with probable Meniere's disease (MD) into either definite or non-MD categories.

Materials and methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a neurotology clinic between 1/2016 and 5/2022. Patients underwent a battery of tests, from which sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, as well as positive and negative likelihood ratios, were calculated. Additionally, prediction nomograms were developed.

Results

Of the 69 patients, 25 (36.2 %) were initially classified as definite MD, 21 (30.4 %), probable MD, and 23 (33.4 %) non-MD. The mean follow-up was 3.5 years. The sensitivity of electrocochleography (ECochG) was the highest (92 %), with a negative likelihood ratio of 15 %. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with MD-protocol had the highest specificity (100 %), with a positive likelihood ratio of 100 %. Videonystagmography, video head impulse test, and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, had lower sensitivity and specificity. We were able to reclassify 18 (86 %) patients with probable MD: 12 (57 %) were diagnosed with definite MD, and 6 (29 %) were diagnosed with non-MD, consistent with their clinical course.

Conclusions

The combination of ECochG and MRI with MD-protocol provides the most reliable approach to reclassify patients with Probable MD, ensuring a precise and accurate diagnosis. Vestibular tests express the functional status of the labyrinth and may not be reliable. Our findings provide valuable insights into clinical decision-making for patients with Probable MD and raise the consideration of additional diagnostic tests as supplementary to the existing clinical-only diagnosis criteria.

用于管理可能患有梅尼埃病的患者的预测提名图和算法。
目的:探讨诊断测试在将初步诊断为可能患有梅尼埃病(MD)的患者准确地重新分类为明确或非MD类别方面的功效:一项回顾性队列研究于 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 5 月 5 日在一家神经耳科诊所进行。患者接受了一系列测试,并从中计算出敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及阳性和阴性似然比。此外,还绘制了预测提名图:在 69 名患者中,25 人(36.2%)最初被归类为明确 MD,21 人(30.4%)被归类为可能 MD,23 人(33.4%)被归类为非 MD。平均随访时间为 3.5 年。耳电图(ECochG)的灵敏度最高(92%),阴性似然比为 15%。采用 MD 方案的磁共振成像(MRI)特异性最高(100%),阳性似然比为 100%。视频震颤成像、视频头脉冲测试和颈前庭诱发肌源性电位的敏感性和特异性较低。我们对 18 名(86%)可能患有 MD 的患者进行了重新分类:12 名(57%)被诊断为确诊 MD,6 名(29%)被诊断为非 MD,这与他们的临床表现一致:结论:将心电图和磁共振成像与 MD 方案相结合,是对疑似 MD 患者进行重新分类的最可靠方法,可确保诊断的精确性和准确性。前庭测试反映的是迷宫的功能状态,可能并不可靠。我们的研究结果为疑似 MD 患者的临床决策提供了有价值的见解,并提出了在现有的纯临床诊断标准之外考虑采用其他诊断测试作为补充的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信