Use of Opioids and Epidural Anaesthesia in Labor Analgesia as Important Risk Factors for Apparent Postpartum Urinary Retention: A Case-Control Study.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Yuexiang Wu, Jingying Bao
{"title":"Use of Opioids and Epidural Anaesthesia in Labor Analgesia as Important Risk Factors for Apparent Postpartum Urinary Retention: A Case-Control Study.","authors":"Yuexiang Wu, Jingying Bao","doi":"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20247706.86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Labor analgesic interventions, particularly the use of opioids and epidural anaesthesia, have raised concerns regarding their potential impact on postpartum urinary retention (PUR), necessitating a comprehensive investigation into their association with this clinical outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case-control study analysed clinical data from postpartum patients at our hospital from January 2023 to December 2023. Anaesthetic methods, including opioid and non-opioid drug usage, epidural analgesia and non-use of analgesia, were assessed. Logistic regression analysis was also performed to determine important associations with apparent PUR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included clinical data from 54 postpartum patients with PUR and 54 without urinary retention. A higher percentage of women with apparent PUR received opioids during labour compared with those without PUR (<i>p</i> = 0.033). Conversely, a lower percentage of women with apparent PUR received non-opioid analgesics compared with those without PUR (<i>p</i> = 0.026). In addition, a higher percentage of women with apparent PUR received epidural analgesia compared with those without PUR (<i>p</i> = 0.041). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that opioid consumption during labour was significantly associated with apparent PUR (odds ratio (OR) = 2.469, <i>p</i> = 0.022). By contrast, non-opioid consumption during labour was inversely associated with apparent PUR (OR = 0.297, 95% CI = 0.123-0.681, <i>p</i> = 0.005). In addition, the use of epidural analgesia during labour showed a remarkable association with apparent PUR (OR = 2.857, 95% CI = 1.289-6.552, <i>p</i> = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Opioid use during labour and the use of epidural analgesia were identified as important risk factors for apparent PUR. These findings emphasise the need for a thoughtful and balanced approach to analgesic management during labour to minimise the risk of PUR in obstetric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48852,"journal":{"name":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","volume":"77 6","pages":"632-637"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20247706.86","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Labor analgesic interventions, particularly the use of opioids and epidural anaesthesia, have raised concerns regarding their potential impact on postpartum urinary retention (PUR), necessitating a comprehensive investigation into their association with this clinical outcome.

Methods: This retrospective case-control study analysed clinical data from postpartum patients at our hospital from January 2023 to December 2023. Anaesthetic methods, including opioid and non-opioid drug usage, epidural analgesia and non-use of analgesia, were assessed. Logistic regression analysis was also performed to determine important associations with apparent PUR.

Results: This study included clinical data from 54 postpartum patients with PUR and 54 without urinary retention. A higher percentage of women with apparent PUR received opioids during labour compared with those without PUR (p = 0.033). Conversely, a lower percentage of women with apparent PUR received non-opioid analgesics compared with those without PUR (p = 0.026). In addition, a higher percentage of women with apparent PUR received epidural analgesia compared with those without PUR (p = 0.041). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that opioid consumption during labour was significantly associated with apparent PUR (odds ratio (OR) = 2.469, p = 0.022). By contrast, non-opioid consumption during labour was inversely associated with apparent PUR (OR = 0.297, 95% CI = 0.123-0.681, p = 0.005). In addition, the use of epidural analgesia during labour showed a remarkable association with apparent PUR (OR = 2.857, 95% CI = 1.289-6.552, p = 0.011).

Conclusions: Opioid use during labour and the use of epidural analgesia were identified as important risk factors for apparent PUR. These findings emphasise the need for a thoughtful and balanced approach to analgesic management during labour to minimise the risk of PUR in obstetric patients.

分娩镇痛中使用阿片类药物和硬膜外麻醉是产后明显尿潴留的重要风险因素:病例对照研究。
背景:分娩镇痛干预,尤其是阿片类药物和硬膜外麻醉的使用,引起了人们对其对产后尿潴留(PUR)潜在影响的关注,因此有必要对其与这一临床结果的关系进行全面调查:这项回顾性病例对照研究分析了我院 2023 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间产后患者的临床数据。评估了麻醉方法,包括阿片类和非阿片类药物的使用、硬膜外镇痛和不使用镇痛。此外,还进行了逻辑回归分析,以确定与表观 PUR 的重要关联:这项研究包括 54 名患有 PUR 和 54 名无尿潴留的产后患者的临床数据。与无尿潴留的产妇相比,有明显尿潴留的产妇在分娩期间接受阿片类药物治疗的比例更高(p = 0.033)。相反,与无尿潴留的产妇相比,有明显尿潴留的产妇接受非阿片类镇痛药的比例较低(p = 0.026)。此外,与无 PUR 的产妇相比,有明显 PUR 的产妇接受硬膜外镇痛的比例更高(p = 0.041)。逻辑回归分析表明,在分娩过程中使用阿片类药物与表观PUR显著相关(几率比(OR)= 2.469,p = 0.022)。相比之下,分娩过程中使用非阿片类药物与表观 PUR 值成反比(OR = 0.297,95% CI = 0.123-0.681,p = 0.005)。此外,在分娩过程中使用硬膜外镇痛与表观 PUR 有显著相关性(OR = 2.857,95% CI = 1.289-6.552,p = 0.011):结论:在分娩过程中使用阿片类药物和使用硬膜外镇痛被认为是导致明显PUR的重要风险因素。这些发现强调了在分娩过程中采取周到、平衡的镇痛管理方法的必要性,以最大限度地降低产科患者发生 PUR 的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Archivos Españoles de Urología published since 1944, is an international peer review, susbscription Journal on Urology with original and review articles on different subjets in Urology: oncology, endourology, laparoscopic, andrology, lithiasis, pediatrics , urodynamics,... Case Report are also admitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信