Perceived Benefit and Satisfaction With a Tablet Computer and an Emergency Smartwatch by Older Adults and Their Relatives: Prospective Real-World Pilot Study.

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.2196/53811
Patrick Wiegel, Marina Liselotte Fotteler, Brigitte Kohn, Sarah Mayer, Filippo Maria Verri, Dhayana Dallmeier, Michael Denkinger
{"title":"Perceived Benefit and Satisfaction With a Tablet Computer and an Emergency Smartwatch by Older Adults and Their Relatives: Prospective Real-World Pilot Study.","authors":"Patrick Wiegel, Marina Liselotte Fotteler, Brigitte Kohn, Sarah Mayer, Filippo Maria Verri, Dhayana Dallmeier, Michael Denkinger","doi":"10.2196/53811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assistive technologies (ATs) have the potential to promote the quality of life and independent living of older adults and, further, to relieve the burden of formal and informal caregivers and relatives. Technological developments over the last decades have led to a boost of available ATs. However, evidence on the benefits and satisfaction with ATs in real-world applications remains scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This prospective, real-world, pilot study tested the perceived benefit and satisfaction with different ATs in the real-world environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Community-dwelling adults aged ≥65 and their relatives tested a tablet computer with a simplified interface or a smartwatch with programmable emergency contacts for 8 weeks in their everyday life. Perceived benefits and satisfaction with ATs were assessed by all older adults and their relatives using different assessment tools before and after the intervention. Outcome measures included the Technology Usage Inventory, Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0, and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 older adults (tablet computer: n=8, 47% and smartwatch: n=9, 53%) and 16 relatives (tablet computer: n=7, 44% and smartwatch: n=9, 56%) were included in the study. The number of participants that were frail (according to the Clinical Frailty Scale) and received care was higher in the smartwatch group than in the tablet computer group. Older adults of the smartwatch group reported higher technology acceptance (Technology Usage Inventory) and satisfaction (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0) scores than those of the tablet computer group, although the differences were not significant (all P>.05). In the tablet computer group, relatives had significantly higher ratings on the item intention to use than older adults (t12.3=3.3, P=.006). Identified everyday issues with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure included contact/communication and entertainment/information for the tablet computer, safety and getting help in emergency situations for the smartwatch, and the usability of the AT for both devices. While the performance (t8=3.5, P=.008) and satisfaction (t8=3.2, P=.01) in these domains significantly improved in the smartwatch group, changes in the tablet computer group were inconsistent (all P>.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the remaining obstacles for the widespread and effective application of ATs in the everyday life of older adults and their relatives. While the results do not provide evidence for a positive effect regarding communication deficits, perceived benefits could be shown for the area of safety. Future research and technical developments need to consider not only the preferences, problems, and goals of older adults but also their relatives and caregivers to improve the acceptability and effectiveness of ATs.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e53811"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11310738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/53811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Assistive technologies (ATs) have the potential to promote the quality of life and independent living of older adults and, further, to relieve the burden of formal and informal caregivers and relatives. Technological developments over the last decades have led to a boost of available ATs. However, evidence on the benefits and satisfaction with ATs in real-world applications remains scarce.

Objective: This prospective, real-world, pilot study tested the perceived benefit and satisfaction with different ATs in the real-world environment.

Methods: Community-dwelling adults aged ≥65 and their relatives tested a tablet computer with a simplified interface or a smartwatch with programmable emergency contacts for 8 weeks in their everyday life. Perceived benefits and satisfaction with ATs were assessed by all older adults and their relatives using different assessment tools before and after the intervention. Outcome measures included the Technology Usage Inventory, Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0, and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure.

Results: A total of 17 older adults (tablet computer: n=8, 47% and smartwatch: n=9, 53%) and 16 relatives (tablet computer: n=7, 44% and smartwatch: n=9, 56%) were included in the study. The number of participants that were frail (according to the Clinical Frailty Scale) and received care was higher in the smartwatch group than in the tablet computer group. Older adults of the smartwatch group reported higher technology acceptance (Technology Usage Inventory) and satisfaction (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0) scores than those of the tablet computer group, although the differences were not significant (all P>.05). In the tablet computer group, relatives had significantly higher ratings on the item intention to use than older adults (t12.3=3.3, P=.006). Identified everyday issues with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure included contact/communication and entertainment/information for the tablet computer, safety and getting help in emergency situations for the smartwatch, and the usability of the AT for both devices. While the performance (t8=3.5, P=.008) and satisfaction (t8=3.2, P=.01) in these domains significantly improved in the smartwatch group, changes in the tablet computer group were inconsistent (all P>.05).

Conclusions: This study highlights the remaining obstacles for the widespread and effective application of ATs in the everyday life of older adults and their relatives. While the results do not provide evidence for a positive effect regarding communication deficits, perceived benefits could be shown for the area of safety. Future research and technical developments need to consider not only the preferences, problems, and goals of older adults but also their relatives and caregivers to improve the acceptability and effectiveness of ATs.

老年人及其亲属对平板电脑和应急智能手表的认知效益和满意度:前瞻性真实世界试点研究。
背景:辅助技术(ATs)有可能提高老年人的生活质量和独立生活能力,并进一步减轻正式和非正式护理人员及亲属的负担。过去几十年来的技术发展使可用的辅助技术越来越多。然而,在实际应用中,有关自动辅助工具的益处和满意度的证据仍然很少:这项前瞻性、真实世界的试点研究测试了在真实世界环境中使用不同自动辅助工具的益处和满意度:方法:年龄≥65 岁、居住在社区的成年人及其亲属在日常生活中对带有简化界面的平板电脑或带有可编程紧急联系人功能的智能手表进行了为期 8 周的测试。在干预前后,所有老年人及其亲属使用不同的评估工具评估了对智能辅助工具的感知益处和满意度。结果测量包括技术使用清单、魁北克用户对辅助技术满意度评估 2.0 和加拿大职业表现测量:共有 17 名老年人(平板电脑:8 人,占 47%;智能手表:9 人,占 53%)和 16 名亲属(平板电脑:7 人,占 44%;智能手表:9 人,占 56%)参与了研究。智能手表组中身体虚弱(根据临床虚弱量表)并接受护理的参与者人数高于平板电脑组。与平板电脑组相比,智能手表组老年人的技术接受度(技术使用情况量表)和满意度(魁北克用户对辅助技术满意度评估 2.0)得分更高,但差异不显著(均大于 P.05)。在平板电脑组中,亲属在使用意向项目上的评分明显高于老年人(t12.3=3.3,P=.006)。在加拿大职业表现测量中发现的日常问题包括:平板电脑的联系/沟通和娱乐/信息,智能手表的安全和紧急情况下的求助,以及两种设备的辅助工具的可用性。虽然智能手表组在这些领域的表现(t8=3.5,P=.008)和满意度(t8=3.2,P=.01)都有显著提高,但平板电脑组的变化并不一致(均为P>.05):本研究强调了在老年人及其亲属的日常生活中广泛而有效地应用智能辅助工具仍然存在的障碍。虽然研究结果没有提供证据证明在沟通障碍方面有积极的效果,但在安全方面可以显示出明显的益处。未来的研究和技术发展不仅需要考虑老年人的偏好、问题和目标,还需要考虑他们的亲属和照顾者,以提高辅助工具的可接受性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信